On 13/12/14 12:12, Tomo Ruby wrote:
> But what does "meaningful way" mean?
That there may be theoretic methods to use signatures to learn information
about the private key, but that they are all so impractical that they can be
ignored.
HTH,
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in comb
On 28/11/14 11:41, NdK wrote:
>> Oh, I agree, I already thought that might close any 'r'-swapping security
>> issues, if there would be any; just like you can include the hash
>> algorithm in the signature to prevent swapping it out for a weaker one. But
>> when
>> swapping 'r''s does not actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/12/14 16:37, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> This key will always be capable of signing by definition
In what sense is that? It seems GnuPG is not letting me sign data with a
certify-only key:
$ gpg2 --edit-key de500b3e
[...]
pub 2048R/DE500B3E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 6 December 2014 at 3:25:02 PM, in
, MFPA wrote:
> I have the following line in my gpg.conf to generate a
> signature notation:-
> sig-notation
> issuer-...@notations.openpgp.fifthhorseman.net=%g
> I noticed when verifying sig
I asked a few weeks ago about sharing an encrypted
file between windows and Linux boxes.
Lots of hassle uninstalling an old version of gpg4win (I had to stop
the service prior to deleting / uninstalling), but now
working well.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Bash/shell scripts available if wanted.
r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/13/2014 02:41 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/12/14 16:37, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> This key will always be capable of signing by definition
>
> In what sense is that? It seems GnuPG i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 13 December 2014 at 2:22:17 PM, in
, Kristian Fiskerstrand
wrote:
> But you could always generate a new self-signature
> giving it signing capability.
As you said in an earlier posting, that requires the use of a hacked
GnuPG version
On Wednesday, 2014-12-10 21:08:05 Samir Nassar wrote:
> The Arch linux GnuPG package 2.1.0-6 is unable to connect to HKPS.
As of the latest update to GnuPG 2.1.0-7, thanks to Gaetan Bisson, gpg should
work with HKPS
--
Samir Nassar
sa...@samirnassar.com
https://samirnassar.com
PGP Fingerprint:
On 14 December 2014 at 08:18, Samir Nassar wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2014-12-10 21:08:05 Samir Nassar wrote:
>> The Arch linux GnuPG package 2.1.0-6 is unable to connect to HKPS.
>
> As of the latest update to GnuPG 2.1.0-7, thanks to Gaetan Bisson, gpg should
> work with HKPS
What was the underlyi
