-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 13 December 2014 at 2:22:17 PM, in <mid:548c4b99.6030...@sumptuouscapital.com>, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > But you could always generate a new self-signature > giving it signing capability. As you said in an earlier posting, that requires the use of a hacked GnuPG version. Which would tend to limit how many people are capable or willing. > But anyhow, that is a > digression, the point remains that a spare S capability > does no harm to the security of the key. I think that's true. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net People who throw kisses are hopelessly lazy. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUjIhDXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwW9UH/33ceza5Etz54mYgMFD5eXl+ 6lpnU2ilG5hfaATk2KSn692a56jBVykeAqZc8molZH2qNFzGxCFVjZoldtxg+p4h sAKBKdIxdFLU+sXttNJ7R0LeQ8iEldqMl9h5MlYur+4KaPXLgkPt7+t1UyBtQgVS AX259ZwL9ch7ugXvgNNWwl4ciG8Sv8tk7260XPiVJbeesj8p0FNsU+7pJSLBfuYk jY3rej6V6tFHjJjqLxH4iKPGQHdAbCcwadVaZC6pJqloAjKL4EdUoSl1qMRdVs6p xCWjiRT6YL/Edaqz7LkCJw72p6QMxC6+wjQiEaEfJWGRKIQ0GtJynscerdH2We2I vgQBFgoAZgUCVIyISl8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMAAKCRAXErxGGvd45LFhAQAwSDPKnjEp4kv4nMpTqEf6X+Yl A4AFLI0EMYZhULw3CAEAz17AHAuZJpGKUrfU0f1GOeJE2YlLRaa+V2WKkzcbLg0= =zzh7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
