-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 12/13/2014 02:41 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/12/14 16:37, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> This key will always be capable of signing by definition > > In what sense is that? It seems GnuPG is not letting me sign data > with a certify-only key:
But you could always generate a new self-signature giving it signing capability. But anyhow, that is a digression, the point remains that a spare S capability does no harm to the security of the key. - -- - ---------------------------- Kristian Fiskerstrand Blog: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com Twitter: @krifisk - ---------------------------- Public OpenPGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 - ---------------------------- "If you choose to sail upon the seas of banking, build your bank as you would your boat, with the strength to sail safely through any storm." (Jacob Safra (1891–1963)) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUjEuXAAoJEPw7F94F4TagmWMP/3HPvVFVT4z6eSHrD3lv6/04 AimNwBp4a5E7po1yHL1+UFJDcow44K/ZmdL4isVP918NcfO+DNaTwN98QA7BCxRb Pj+F/vt4j2Tg+qUCM4RX/nirZQxMVxeRITLRjeG1ptKOKBiLFd+/8N+SVynM1k2u 5iv8taLCBXCRBJQjvGrW7bzWZoL8B1grJvGWOFFnX91zpAvmQJrnQ9/5f/M6otlY tjq8gGf12WAVS+YotcBtkLs3MQxTzCGWH5EFam/pbnKpfqzGPelKd2BFyFAA45kF GmVaOjv3DUnGpYIRqbciDnOdeEIxVJNiaKNgqB0pC0psavpqm94+juqlAy/xsiKr /TIcxWw+BHnq3azRnfcHX6QaXPqI3EtLGftEUSr5wYVOfr3lEJ+XhLiYQBT5lmlk ZNb3ncV2Sg1i5MvqgTgH9k11tq/uv0OmsCyVPuD7set5LGAbknfiLaODFd1NwRYh BrNj2FIyCQ4Knj/Qk0fSrQnk9fqYYi0F3XlrLbL5nARRVx1dxPSo/ZlCi+wnF5cF UoOOso1Fho4fER9o6S3xYb8s/QcOlpDiaJhvbHc+Xi0wcpIIPU/QQNbpzps9mGkh dwWNHjrSxChonur75zTlSUGadzJsVYy5WKV38jXSVL31dkLP5NgcNxroRyrPPina qgBcio7etspFtTqXnNtE =kLI/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
