On 11/18/2011 11:07, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 11/18/11 1:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> My original post was intended to be a humorous jab pointing out the
>> irony of restricting our freedom to discuss other, relevant, software
>> projects; in the name of freedom. That's all. :)
>
> Is it reall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 18 November 2011 at 2:31:31 AM, in
, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Speaking generally, in English saying something is a
> "public so-and-so" means it belongs to the public, not
> that it is open to the public. The opposite, a
> "private
On 11/18/11 1:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> My original post was intended to be a humorous jab pointing out the
> irony of restricting our freedom to discuss other, relevant, software
> projects; in the name of freedom. That's all. :)
Is it really irony at all? The GPL itself restricts freedom for
On 11/18/2011 00:25, Jerome Baum wrote:
> For what it's worth, I don't feel that it would be "intolerant and
> freedom-of-choice-denying" at all if Symantec were to say "in the PGP
> forums you should not advocate other alternatives" because "the PGP
> forums" are their turf. gnupg-users is GnuPG-t
On 2011-11-17 22:39, Mark Kirchner wrote:
> Am 17.11.2011 21:31, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>> No: *you* would call them intolerant and freedom-of-choice-denying.
>> Please be careful about making universal statements about what the
>> world in general would say: the world generally does not confor
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:03, pascal.sartore...@elca.ch said:
> For now, I only want to have a look at GPA to see if my company has the
> skills required to extend it, then I will use the git access.
The git server even allows you to create a tarball. But cloning the
repo is much easier. Save you
> It is for sure included in the gpg4win source tarball (300mb or so).
[Pascal Sartoretti] I only found a tarball named "gpg4win-2.1.0.tar.bz2"
of 5.8 MB, could you point me to the 300 MB one ?
For now, I only want to have a look at GPA to see if my company has the
skills required to extend it, th
On 11/17/2011 4:39 PM, Mark Kirchner wrote:
> I used "public" as in "open to the public". At least that was what I was
> trying to do, but since I'm not a native speaker, I might have mis-used
> the word.
Speaking generally, in English saying something is a "public so-and-so"
means it belongs to t
On 17/11/11 22:23, MFPA wrote:
> For what it's worth, I didn't try to recommend anything.
/Somebody/ did though, although I only see a quote and no author... please
notice the quote below is quoting yet someone else; it is not Sartoretti who
recommended GPGshell.
On 15/11/11 09:39, Sartoretti Pas
Am 17.11.2011 21:31, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> On 11/17/2011 2:39 PM, Mark Kirchner wrote:
>> But please let me re-phrase: Those rules seem to deny people the
>> freedom to discuss software alternatives on a public mailing list?
>
> If this was a public mailing list, I'd agree with you.
I used
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 17 November 2011 at 8:31:04 PM, in
, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Saying, "please do not recommend proprietary software"
> is not a rule that gives me the moral heebie-jeebies,
> so I'm happy to comply with it.
For what it's worth, I
On 11/17/2011 2:39 PM, Mark Kirchner wrote:
> But please let me re-phrase: Those rules seem to deny people the
> freedom to discuss software alternatives on a public mailing list?
If this was a public mailing list, I'd agree with you.
This mailing list is owned and operated by private citizens.
Am 17.11.2011 12:38, schrieb Werner Koch:
> Despite that the GNU maintainer rules say that we shall not mention
> proprietary software at all
I see. So, since my "frown" was obviously misdirected at you, Werner, I
think I owe you an apology.
But please let me re-phrase: Those rules seem to deny
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:07, m...@mark-kirchner.de said:
> I've always perceived you as a free software advocate, but now at the
> same time you seem to try to deny others the freedom to discuss software
> alternatives on a public mailing list? And so, in the end, limit the
Most mailing lists have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 at 10:55:26 PM, in
, Milo wrote:
> You are missing a slight difference between discussing
> alternatives and - more or less - advertising
> proprietary software on "GPL-powered" project's mailing
> list.
A quest
On 11/16/2011 11:36 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 06:59, Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:13, expires2...@ymail.com said:
>>
>>> GPGshell is a GUI frontend for GnuPG.
>>
>> Note that this is proprietary software. I'd prefer if you would not
>> suggest this on a GnuPG mailing l
Am 16.11.2011 15:59, schrieb Werner Koch:
> Note that this is proprietary software. I'd prefer if you would not
> suggest this on a GnuPG mailing list. The GNU project (which GnuPG
> is a part of) is a about software freedom; proprietary software is
> about taking away your freedoms.
While I'
On 11/16/2011 06:59, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:13, expires2...@ymail.com said:
>
>> GPGshell is a GUI frontend for GnuPG.
>
> Note that this is proprietary software. I'd prefer if you would not
> suggest this on a GnuPG mailing list. The GNU project (which GnuPG is a
> part of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 at 2:59:31 PM, in
, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:13, expires2...@ymail.com said:
>> GPGshell is a GUI frontend for GnuPG.
> Note that this is proprietary software. I'd prefer if
> you would not s
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:13, expires2...@ymail.com said:
> GPGshell is a GUI frontend for GnuPG.
Note that this is proprietary software. I'd prefer if you would not
suggest this on a GnuPG mailing list. The GNU project (which GnuPG is a
part of) is a about software freedom; proprietary software i
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:33, pascal.sartore...@elca.ch said:
> I couldn't find GPA's source code in neither the GPG4Win source code,
> nor on the GPG4win's web site. Can you point me to the code ?
It is for sure included in the gpg4win source tarball (300mb or so).
However to get the actually used
>> - Is there an easy way to open a file from GPA's "File Manager"
window ?
> No. However feel free to add support for it.
I couldn't find GPA's source code in neither the GPG4Win source code,
nor on the GPG4win's web site. Can you point me to the code ?
> In case you are using Gpg4win, the Gpg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 at 8:39:27 AM, in
, Sartoretti
Pascal wrote:
>> Take a look at GPGshell. It will do what you want,
>> and them some.
> I am confused : is this "GPGshell" the same as the
> "GpgEX" component included in the Gpg4Win
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:28, pascal.sartore...@elca.ch said:
> - Is there an easy way to open a file from GPA's "File Manager" window ?
No. However feel free to add support for it.
In case you are using Gpg4win, the GpgEx file explorer extension is much
better suited for the task.
> - Why is it
> Take a look at GPGshell. It will do what you want, and them some.
I am confused : is this "GPGshell" the same as the "GpgEX" component
included in the Gpg4Win package ? "GpgEX" is described as "GnuPG Shell
extension" in the installer.
I couldn't find any info on any of those component in the G
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:28:56 +0100
From: "Sartoretti Pascal"
To:
Subject: GPA File Manager : double-click not possible ?
Message-ID: <26958edc00c9f545a300bac81c5a652d6ed...@ms02.elca.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello,
I am a n
Hello,
I am a new user to the GNU Privacy Assistant; it works fine, but there
is one thing that annoys me in the "File Manager" window : it is not
possible to double-click on a decrypted file to open it (using the
application associated to it in the operating system), I have to open it
via Window'
27 matches
Mail list logo
