-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Wednesday 16 November 2011 at 10:55:26 PM, in
<mid:4ec43f5e.1030...@oneiroi.net>, Milo wrote:


> You are missing a slight difference between discussing
> alternatives and - more or less - advertising
> proprietary software on "GPL-powered" project's mailing
> list.


A question was posted as to whether a certain proprietary software app
was the same as a component in the GPG4win package. I answered briefly
and provided a link so that the person who asked could easily read
more if they so wished.

I am sorry my posting caused upset. However, I don't think it amounted
to "advertising." I have no link to any proprietary app or the author
thereof.


- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:expires2...@ymail.com

Is it possible to be a closet claustrophobic?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQCVAwUBTsRcpKipC46tDG5pAQqGewP/fjXd131QsycCi8ws820K7qbO0+X8hzC0
8QOgZVilrBPWJiXNBItk0b6brCOScb3YWoFYvBdbbbuGZSrNu2icNb5BIqRhHPzc
ZC795/oTqQaDTbNAhNmbVEJSbqgQrqo37lxcCmETU+dr5wZ+XTW59Z2mCNJHSnG2
mA3FBEN7U18=
=d5Af
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to