Re: fingerprint associated public key does not match displayed public key

Hi S.B., * "S.B. via Gnupg-users" [2021-12-16; 10:37]: > maybe I'm not explaining it well. I was able to import a public key using: > > gpg --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys fingerprint* > > the fingerprint was provided to me by the intended recipient via their > profile page. >

Forget it, user error (was: Re: pinentry-{qt,gtk2,gnome3} stopped working pinentry-fltk works, why?)

Dear gnupg users, the pinetry-qt window now shows up again, behind other windows... Sorry for the noise, Gregor * Gregor Zattler [21. Dez. 2020]: > Dear gnupg users, since Friday pinentry-{qt,gtk2,gnome3} > stopped working. When I want to decrypt some .gpg file, no dialog > appear

pinentry-{qt,gtk2,gnome3} stopped working pinentry-fltk works, why?

Dear gnupg users, since Friday pinentry-{qt,gtk2,gnome3} stopped working. When I want to decrypt some .gpg file, no dialog appears and gpg-agent times out. Luckily pinentry-curses and pinentry-fltk still do work. This is on a debian buster system with gpg* packages from backports, pinentry* pack

how to integrate ca-certificates with gpgsm (for email s/mime signature verification)

Hi gnupg users and developers, , I use notmuch-emacs to read my email and sometimes do use GnuPG, therefore notmuch-emacs is configured to verify signatures but does so also for S/MIME signatures. When displaying such emails I'm asked if I trust the respective Root CAs Cert. That's tedious. Th

gpg-agent: different ttl for different keys possible?

Dear gnupg-users and developers, is it possible to configure gpg-agent to cache the passphrase for different OpenPGP keys for a different length of time? if so: how? Ciao, Gregor ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.o

SOLVED (was: Re: strange error message, how to delete key 0x00000000)

Hi Ben, * Ben McGinnes [20. Aug. 2016]: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:16:47PM +0200, Gregor Zattler wrote: >> >> Thanks for your answer but in my case this seems not to be the >> cause: I did a >> >> gpg --list-public-keys |sed -e "s/ //g"|grep 000

Re: strange error message, how to delete key

Hi Ben, * Ben McGinnes [20. Aug. 2016]: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:51:55PM +0200, Gregor Zattler wrote: >> I get strange errormessages when listing keys, e.g.: >> >> $ gpg --list-key doesnotexist >> gpg: Oops: keyid_from_fingerprint: no pubkey >> gpg: Oops:

strange error message, how to delete key

Dear gnupg users/developers, I get strange errormessages when listing keys, e.g.: $ gpg --list-key doesnotexist gpg: Oops: keyid_from_fingerprint: no pubkey gpg: Oops: keyid_from_fingerprint: no pubkey gpg: key 0x occurs more than once in the trustdb gpg: Oops: keyid_from_fingerprint: no

Re: Talking about Cryptodevices... which one?

Hi Werner, * Werner Koch [03. Feb. 2015]: > On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:44, pe...@digitalbrains.com said: >> sure of the latter type number). I forgot what that reader Werner >> uses is called. > > SCT3512 (http://werner.eifzilla.de/sct3512.jpg) for carrying around and > an SCR3310 full size reader gl

Re: auto refresh for expired certificates

Hi MFPA, gnupg users, * MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> [26. Oct. 2014]: > Hi > > > On Sunday 26 October 2014 at 7:19:28 AM, in > , NdK wrote: > > > >> IIRC a tool exists to do that, in a way that makes it hard for keyserver >> owners to extract "social" metadata (like "these ke

Re: howto not list disabled keys?

Hi Peter, * Peter Lebbing [09. Feb. 2014]: > On 09/02/14 12:32, Gregor Zattler wrote: >> I'd like to list only the public keys which are not disabled. Is >> there a way to achieve this? > > I don't know if there are more ways, but you can view the disabled sta

howto not list disabled keys?

Dear gnupg users, developers, I'd like to list only the public keys which are not disabled. Is there a way to achieve this? If this is not possible: How to show the enabled/disabled status of a key in the key listing? Ciao, Gregor -- -... --- .-. . -.. ..--.. ...-.- _

Re: MUA "automatically signs keys"?

Hi nb.linux, * nb.linux [29. Jan. 2014]: > Gregor Zattler: >> * Steve Jones [24. Jan. 2014]: >>> Which reminds me that I'd really like an email client that >>> automatically signs keys at level 1 (persona) of anyone who replies >>> with a signed email

MUA "automatically signs keys"? (was: Re: Non email addresses in UID)

Hi Steve, gnupg users, * Steve Jones [24. Jan. 2014]: > Which reminds me that I'd really like an email client that > automatically signs keys at level 1 (persona) of anyone who replies > with a signed email that quotes a significant portion of the text I > sent, as this effectively counts as a cha

Re: Question Regarding Passphrases When Signing

Hi Jim, * Jim Ernst [09. Jan. 2014]: > I am trying to sign and encrypt a file using a UNIX script. No > matter what I do, the passphrase that is requested appears to > be for the first key that is listed via -list-keys. I have > tried specifying a recipient but that does not seem to make any > dif

Re: Web of Trust in Practical Usage

Hi Peter, gnupg-users, * Peter Lebbing [28. Apr. 2013]: > So while tools like PGP Pathfinder can find signature paths, it doesn't really > help for validity, which needs ownertrust of a direct parent of the key you > want > validated. There are no ownertrust paths. There are no ownertrust paths

Re: US 11 Circ: 5th Am. & passphrase demands

Hi vedaal, gnupg-users, * ved...@nym.hush.com [24. Feb. 2012]: > Robert J. Hansen rjh at sixdemonbag.org wrote on > Fri Feb 24 05:46:40 CET 2012 : > >>The court sided with the appellant, and held that he could not be > compelled to produce decrypted data for the government. [...] > unfortunate

Re: Using root CAs as a trusted 3rd party

Hi Mike, gnupg users, * gn...@lists.grepular.com [22. Jan. 2012]: [...] > I sometimes wonder if the traditional public web of trust is even a good > idea. Are you happy to be associated with everybody you've signed the > key of and those who have signed yours? Are you sure that none of these > peo

Re: Using root CAs as a trusted 3rd party

Hi Aaron, gnupg users, * Aaron Toponce [21. Jan. 2012]: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 10:50:11PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote: >> IMHO by signing a key you make a statement about the connection >> between a person or owner and the user id you sign, saying "I >> somehow convi

Re: Using root CAs as a trusted 3rd party

Hi Aaron, gnupg users, * Aaron Toponce [21. Jan. 2012]: > I just signed an OpenPGP key with cert level 0x12 (casual checking) given > the following scenario: > > * A PGP key was signed by an SSL certificate that was signed by a root > CA > * I verified that the signature was indeed

Re: Encryting both file contents and file name with GnuPG

Hi Neil, * Neil Phillips [02. Jan. 2011]: > Can someone tell me how I can encrypt the name of the file that I want to > encrypt please. > > Example: > mySecrets.txt [a plain text file] > > I would like: > szstt.asd [some 'apparently random name' file] [file contents encrypted] You may invoke gn

Re: Signed key contains signer's user ID?

Hi Sansibar, * takethe...@gmx.de [01. Jan. 2011]: > does a signed key contain the signer's user ID no > or only his key ID? yes > Do you need to posses the signer's public key to see where he > is the signer of a signed key? yes > My gpg works that way, but I wonder whether it simply > su

Re: how to change the default symmetric cipher

Hi Alex, * Alex Smily [31. Aug. 2010]: > now my question is how to choose the symmetric encryption > algorithm among the available ciphers in GNUPG. > & is there any way of selecting / adding a new symmetric cipher > to GNUPG on which both sender and recipient are agreed. Different OpenPGP cli

Re: Modified user ids and key servers and a possible security risk?

Hi Daniel, gnupg-users, * Daniel Kahn Gillmor [25. Aug. 2010]: > On 08/25/2010 12:18 PM, thomas weidner wrote: >> Some sources on the web suggested leaving a message in the old >> key which states that the key is not used any more. to do this >> i binary edited a gpg files and uploaded the modifie

Re: Where is FAQ?

Hi Jean-David, * Jean-David Beyer [23. Jul. 2010]: > I have what I am sure is a frequently asked question, but I cannot find > a FAQ. There is a FAQ at http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html but it does not contain your question. > I can find the archives, but I know no good way to search them. > > It

ascii art envelope (was: Re: Email signature)

ice ascii art for signatures (see below). Cia; Gregor -- +---+ pub 1024D/D25307CA 2001-09-29 Gregor Zattler |\ O---m /| Gregor Zattler |/`---'\| Using public key encrytion is like signing a letter and sen

Re: turning off gpg-agent

Hi Shane, * shane howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19. Jan. 2008]: > but as it is i don't want this functionality, i would prefer to > enter my pass phrase every time. The question is, how do i stop > gpg from trying to contact the agent? I did have a look int > ~/.gnupg?gpg.conf for the line user-agen

Re: how to create a key with two user ids and two number ids

Hi dmdm, * dmdm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16. Dez. 2007]: > > how to create a key with twoids > what is the command line? > > ie [EMAIL PROTECTED] > and > [EMAIL PROTECTED] You first create a key with one user-id gpg --gen-key and the add the other gpg --edit-key adduid your-first-user-or-key-id-

Re: Decrypt only if signed

Hi Hardeep, * Hardeep Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [17. Dez. 2007]: > I am writing a batch script and the basic requirement is that GPG > should only decrypt the file if its signed by using one of the keys in > the keyring. If it has not been signed, just encrypted, it should > leave it encrypted and

Re: GNUpg 2.0.7 installation

Hi Rick, * Rick Shupe Sr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09. Dez. 2007]: > I am a new linux user and I just downloaded and installed the latest > version on GNUPG. Everything seemed to go accordingly. ./configure make > and make install. After all that was done I tried to go into the > program by typing in

Re: disjunct paths

Hi David, * David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06. Dez. 2005]: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:10:01PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote: > > * David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30. Nov. 2005]: > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:11:44PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote: > > O.k. i

Re: disjunct paths

Hi David, * David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30. Nov. 2005]: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:11:44PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote: > > * David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30. Nov. 2005]: > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:29:21PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote: > > >

Re: disjunct paths

Hi David, * David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30. Nov. 2005]: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:29:21PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote: > > Hi David, > > * David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [28. Nov. 2005]: > > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:56:16AM +0100, Jaap Eldering wrote

disjunct paths (was: Re: trust path lookup on server)

Hi David, * David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [28. Nov. 2005]: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:56:16AM +0100, Jaap Eldering wrote: > Yes, it is. There are a few servers that do more or less what you > describe (for example http://www.lysator.liu.se/~jc/wotsap/). It's > useful to see the various paths,

is your message about service throughput? (was: Re: throughput of GnuPG symmetric ciphers)

Hi Ryan, * Ryan Malayter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01. Aug. 2005]: > I'm reposting this because it never appeared on the list for some > reason, even after 12 hours. is your message about service throughput? Gregor ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@g

Re: First release candidate for GnuPG 1.4.2 available

Hi Dan, * Dan Mundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04. Jun. 2005]: > Found a problem!! Weird one though... > > when setting key trust with enigmail for Thunderbird, the openpgp > management gives me an 'undefined error', but after this, it changes the > trust as if nothing went wrong. I even was the light

please read the documentation Re: (no subject)

Hi Dan, * Dan Mundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [28. Mai. 2005]: > hey everyone, just letting you all know i'm new to mailing lists. > > by the way, here's my public key. make sure to sign it! > > Public key for 0x4DB6E71B8061A830 > -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) >

Re: Separate Keyring and config for Script

Hi Sascha,, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [23. Mai. 2005]: > gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring > /home/sascha/gpg-skript/auto-gpg-keyring.gpg --options /dev/null > --no-secmem-warning --charset utf-8 --import /my/path/*.asc > > it works for about 500 files - followed by: > > gpg: keys