Sheogorath via Gnupg-users:
> I'm sorry to disappoint you here: Neither ProtonMail nor Tutanota speak
> proper OpenPGP (by default) with outside services. Tutanota doesn't
> speak OpenPGP at all and completely bound to their own way of doing
> "email"(?)[1].
>
> Protonmail on the other hand is abl
> Hi
>
>
> On Monday 7 October 2019 at 9:15:54 AM, in
> , john doe wrote:-
>
>
>> would it be possible to add the ability to
>> checksum the binaries?
>
> When a new GnuPG version is announced, there are checksums in the
> announcement. For example, see https://gnupg.org/index.html#sec-3-2.
>
To s
On 9/30/19 4:38 PM, Jeff Allen via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On 9/30/19 4:58 AM, Roland Siemons wrote:
>> Dear GNUPG developers,
>>
>> We have GOT TO make things simpler.
>
>> 3/ Please do appreciate that the persons who we are convincing and
>> instructing are not particularly interested in privacy. T
On 10/7/19 9:32 AM, Phillip Susi wrote:
> Bingo! And as long as the user is not interested in it, and won't learn
> how to properly use it, all they will get is the veneer of privacy and
> learn the hard way that they really aren't secure. You just can't make
> security idiot proof.
I had a real
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 7 October 2019 at 9:15:54 AM, in
, john doe wrote:-
> would it be possible to add the ability to
> checksum the binaries?
When a new GnuPG version is announced, there are checksums in the
announcement. For example, see https://gnupg
Jeff Allen via Gnupg-users writes:
> The original poster, perhaps unintentionally, stated the real reason the
> masses have not adopted PGP, "Please do appreciate that the persons who
> we are convincing and instructing are not particularly interested in
> privacy." That's it in a nutshell. The
On 10/7/2019 12:03 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:15, john doe said:
>
>> In the above link, only the cli version of the 1.4 release is available.
>> I got it from (1).
>
> Nope. That is always the current 2.2.
>
Yes it is there, some how I mist it! :)
Maybe adding something li
Hello,
possibly there is a bug present if manipulating a GnuPG key with subkeys
attached!?
Example:
We want to expire validity of primary key and all subkeys.
C:>gpg --edit-key 7BF4
gpg> expire
This command modifies the date for primary key only, subkeys are NOT
affected.
BUT:
C:>gpg --edit
On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 12:30, Robert J. Hansen said:
> *absolutely no way* integrated into the email message. That had to wait
> until the PGP/MIME RFCs -- that was when OpenPGP became an email protocol.
MIME types for PGP inline were used on Unix soon after the introduction
of MIME in 1992 at abou
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:15, john doe said:
> In the above link, only the cli version of the 1.4 release is available.
> I got it from (1).
Nope. That is always the current 2.2.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
signature.asc
Description
On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 21:21, vedaal said:
> and then a separate option of
> "Export Secret Keys"
The OP explictly suggested to make the exporting of the secret key not
too easy so that users don't accidently send out their secret keys.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausn
Hi, thanks for your answer.
> Hi
>
>
> On Saturday 5 October 2019 at 7:05:55 PM, in
> , john doe wrote:-
>
>
>> In other words, how can I only install the command
>> line version of GPG on
>> Windows.
>
> At https://gnupg.org/download/index.html#sec-1-2 there's a link to
> download "Simple install
12 matches
Mail list logo
