On 04/05/2016 05:57 AM, Daniel Baur wrote:
while it is off-topic: The In-Reply-to and References-header are not the
same.
Depending on the mail client that may or may not be true. :)
But more importantly, the existence of either header will tell the
person looking at the headers that the mess
On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:59, j...@sprig.gs said:
> Is this a failure in my understanding of the gpg command line, or have
> I missed some fundamental part of the documentation somewhere?
auto-key-retrieve
This option enables the automatic retrieving of keys from a
keyserver when _verif
Hi all,
I'm trying to write a script which encrypts against keys retrieved
from a keyserver but doesn't cache them.
I've got the following:
gpg --no-options --trust-model always --no-default-keyring --keyserver
ldap://keyserver.example.com --keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve
--recipient u...@e
Hello,
Am 05.04.2016 um 06:37 schrieb Doug Barton:
> I learned to check the headers, and look for References: (sometimes
> spelled In-Reply-To:) with one or more message Ids after.
while it is off-topic: The In-Reply-to and References-header are not the
same. The in-reply-to-header tells you, for
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Peter Lebbing
wrote:
> Dashamir, note I wasn't attacking your project.
>
I wasn't attacking yours either.
I simply expressed my opinion, and maybe I am wrong.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://li
Dashamir, note I wasn't attacking your project. I was pointing out that
it seemed to me that Eva said she wanted to spend her volunteered time
in one way but at the same time seemed about to spend it in another. She
wanted to reach a large audience, I was merely giving context so she
could make bet
> GnuPG is also aimed at people comfortable with working at the command line.
> So I would say that the potential audience of EasyGPG is greater than that
> of plain GPG.
Wait? What? I am missing one important detail, a part of slightly
obnoxious advertisement in this mailing list, how do you plan
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Peter Lebbing
wrote:
> On 02/04/16 09:55, Eva Bouwman wrote:
> > I will start where Dashamir suggested , [...]
>
> > Personally I tend to agree with Julian. My idea was not to write a OS
> > dependent document, in my opinion the target audience will be narrowed
>
On 02/04/16 09:55, Eva Bouwman wrote:
> I will start where Dashamir suggested , [...]
> Personally I tend to agree with Julian. My idea was not to write a OS
> dependent document, in my opinion the target audience will be narrowed down.
These two statements seem to be in opposition. Dashamir's p
