On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Peter Lebbing <pe...@digitalbrains.com> wrote:
> On 02/04/16 09:55, Eva Bouwman wrote: > > I will start where Dashamir suggested , [...] > > > Personally I tend to agree with Julian. My idea was not to write a OS > > dependent document, in my opinion the target audience will be narrowed > down. > > These two statements seem to be in opposition. Dashamir's project has a > pretty narrow target audience. His code will not run on Windows, and the > Mind what you say ;) http://www.theverge.com/2016/3/30/11331014/microsoft-windows-linux-ubuntu-bash > project is aimed at people comfortable with working at the command line, > whereas most beginners will use a GUI tool. If you want to reach a big > audience, you should probably work on either GnuPG documentation itself > or documentation for a commonly used GUI tool, perhaps Kleopatra or > Enigmail? Personally, I use the command line, I'm not that accustomed to > the GUI tools. > GnuPG is also aimed at people comfortable with working at the command line. So I would say that the potential audience of EasyGPG is greater than that of plain GPG. I can't make any comparison to GUI tools, but there are at least two people here that are not accustomed at them (me and you). Dashamir
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
