On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Marcus Frings wrote:
--ask-cert-level
previously this was on by default. apparently it caused too much
confusion, so now you have to specify it if you want it.
I wish the old behaviour would still be the default.
me too... but you can add "ask-cert-level" to
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 02:03:06PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:41:46PM -0500, Jason Harris wrote:
> > As you seem to have concluded, that fact takes precedence in my
> > logic, and as I have concluded, it seems to take no precedence in
> > yours.
>
> I can only conclude
I just had a look on the source to get an idee of gathering entropy.
I noticed the following:
Line 660-664:
(*add) ( &minimumWorkingSetSize,
sizeof (&minimumWorkingSetSize), requester );
(*add) ( &maximumWorkingSetSize,
sizeof (&maximumWorkingSetSize), reques
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 12:14:25AM +0100, Marcus Frings wrote:
> * Atom Smasher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
>
> >> How is signature level specification done in 1.4+?
> >
>
> > --ask-cert-level
>
> > previously this was on b
* Atom Smasher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
>> How is signature level specification done in 1.4+?
>
> --ask-cert-level
> previously this was on by default. apparently it caused too much
> confusion, so now you have to speci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 08:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> as winpt does not need any 'path' or registry entries in windows,
> it can easily be set up on a usb drive to run with gpg-2-go,
> without any installation into windows, and then run just
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:38:47PM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> By the way, what do you think about the path problem? I tried to add
> "exec- path "%PATH%"" in gpg.conf, but it does not work. It needs to
> be used from the command line. I will make some other tests and I
> will let you kno
Il /22 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 06:50:20PM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
[...]
>> Is this of libcurl 7.13.0 a known problem? Or maybe is just a
[...]
> I don't know. This isn't a GnuPG issue, but a libcurl one. You might
> ask the curl folks, as they are
David Shaw wrote:
That said, keyserver imports on W32 should work with --openpgp set as
well. I will fix that.
Thanks!
-Jason
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
_
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:57:07AM -0500, Jason Markley wrote:
> Taking out the --openpgp in the gpg.conf file seems to have worked for
> the hkp keyserver type. What am I losing by taking that option out of
> the gpgconf file? I don't want to break something else while 'fixing'
> this. Attac
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 06:50:20PM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> So, it was a problem of the MinGW build of the dll, maybe because it
> is an old version.
>
> The gpgkeys_curl.exe so obtained has been compiled with the *.h files of
> mingw-libcurl 7.13.0 and linked against the .a library o
as winpt does not need any 'path' or registry entries in windows,
it can easily be set up on a usb drive to run with gpg-2-go,
without any installation into windows, and then run just by
double-clicking on the WinPT.exe file
what is necessary is:
[a] gpg-2-go (http://www.torduninja.tk/)
[b] w
Il /22 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
[...]
> The strdup segfault is happening due to a call from inside libcurl
> itself. That doesn't necessarily mean a bug in curl, though. What
> version of curl are you using here?
The last one available for MinGW: 7.13.0
> Also, can you try and rebui
Il /22 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
[...]
>> >> >> 1) It seems that, when running a subprocess like a gpgkeys_*.exe,
>> >> >> gpg.exe does not pass it the environment variables. Most notably,
>> >> >> it does not pass the system %PATH%. Both gpg.exe and
>> >> >> gpgkeys_*.exe
[...]
> Yes.
Hi frinds,
I am facing the following renaming problem..
C:\keyrings>C:\gnupg\gpg.exe --homedir . --list-keys
.\pubring.gpg
-
gpg: checking the trustdb
gpg: renaming `.\pubring.gpg' to `.\pubring.bak' failed: Permission denied
gpg: failed to rebuild keyring cache: file rename error
gpg
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:16:19AM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> Il /22 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:18:03AM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> >> Il /21 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 04:18:35PM +0100, Carl
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 08:20:05AM -0500, Jason Markley wrote:
> David,
>
>Yes, i do have --openpgp in my gpg.conf file, and i did a
> --keyserver-options keep-temp-files from the command line with the
> --openpgp option. The results are attached.
Thanks. I'll take a look. However, I ask
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 01:15:15PM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> [...]
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x77c16137 in strdup () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\msvcrt.dll
> #1 0x003d52e0 in ?? ()
> #2 0x0022f088 in ?? ()
> #3 0x69f51e6d in libcurl!curl_slist_free_all () from
> c:\programmi\mingw\bin\libcurl.d
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:06:30PM +0100, Johan Wevers wrote:
> David Shaw wrote:
>
> >By default, GnuPG does not prompt you for a signature level. If you
> >want to be prompted, use '--ask-cert-level'.
>
> And the default, without specifying and without the option
> --default-cert-level, is 0?
Il /22 mar 2005/, *Carlo Luciano Bianco* ha scritto:
> Thanks, Nail. As I told, I am quite new to this sort of things. Here is
> the result:
I mean "Neil", of course, I am really sorry about that...
--
| Carlo Luciano Bianco | ICQ UIN: 109517158 |
|_
Il /22 mar 2005/, *Neil Williams* ha scritto:
> On Tuesday 22 March 2005 9:46 am, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> 0x77c16137 in strdup () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\msvcrt.dll
>
> To find out what caused that fault, use the bt command: backtrac
David Shaw wrote:
>By default, GnuPG does not prompt you for a signature level. If you
>want to be prompted, use '--ask-cert-level'.
And the default, without specifying and without the option
--default-cert-level, is 0?
>If you want to specify, but not be prompted each time, use
>'--default-cer
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 9:46 am, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x77c16137 in strdup () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\msvcrt.dll
To find out what caused that fault, use the bt command: backtrace.
It happened in strdup() so that's usually because t
Il /22 mar 2005/, *Carlo Luciano Bianco* ha scritto:
> Il /22 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
I did much earlier than expected... ;-)
>> Still, for curiosity's sake, try this patch to g10/exec.c:
>
> Thanks! I'll try when I rebuild with "-g" and I'll let you know.
I tried your patch, but t
Il /22 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:18:03AM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
>> Il /21 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
>>
>> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 04:18:35PM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
>> >
>> >> 1) It seems that, when running a subprocess li
25 matches
Mail list logo
