On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:16:19AM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote: > Il /22 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto: > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:18:03AM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote: > >> Il /21 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto: > >> > >> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 04:18:35PM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote: > >> > > >> >> 1) It seems that, when running a subprocess like a gpgkeys_*.exe, > >> >> gpg.exe does not pass it the environment variables. Most notably, it > >> >> does not pass the system %PATH%. Both gpg.exe and gpgkeys_*.exe > [...] > > Interesting. Some difference between POSIX style $PATH and W32 style > > %PATH% maybe? Now that I think about it, GPG on MinGW is going to end > > up appending ':c:\\programmi\gnupg" to your PATH. That may well > > result in a problem since W32 wants ';c:\\programmi\gnupg' (with a > > leading semicolon). > > This can be a problem, yes, but it would affect only the last two folders of > the path (the ones with ":" instead of ";"). Are you sure the gnupg path is > not added as the first one followed by ":"?
Yes. If there is a path to add, it's always appended. However, try setting your --exec-path directly to the path you want. That replaces the current path completely. So: exec-path c:\\whatever;c:\\programmi\gnupg David _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
