Re: Trust model: classic or pgp?

On 2005-03-15 00:13:22 +0100, Marcus Frings wrote: > Sorry for the misunderstanding, my problem was that I wasn't aware > of the new option "tsign" which is new in 1.4.0. After reading the > info about "tsign" in the manpage I understand the difference now. I went looking for this too, and found

Re: [Enigmail] Lib\idea could not be found error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Servie Platon wrote: > Hi folks, > > I got this error message after I issued the command > shown below: > > > gpg: invalid module `Lib\idea': The specified module > could not be found. > > Cipher: 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, > TWOF

Lib\idea could not be found error

Hi folks, I got this error message after I issued the command shown below: Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\servie>gpg --version gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.0 Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program comes with A

Can't select single UIDs for signing keys

Hello, see this: , | [00:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ gpg --set-policy-url http://www.sc-delphin-eschweiler.de/pgp/ --ask-cert-level --sign-key 82F61240 | | pub 1024D/82F61240 created: 2004-10-22 expires: 2010-10-21 usage: CS | trust: unknown validity: undefined |

Re: Trust model: classic or pgp?

* David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:04:20PM +0100, Marcus Frings wrote: >> First of all, what is actually the difference between "pgp" and >> "classic"? The first option tells about WOT and trust signatures but the >> latter just mentions the WOT. > That is the di

german book about gnupg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, i am seeking for a well written German book about gnupg. Is there any book 'bout it? thx ~ ny - -- - - Rainer Bendig aka "Ny" | http://www.moins.de | GnuPG-Key 0x41D44F10

ASCII Armored example from rfc2440bis-12

Given the following example of an ASCII Armored Message in section 6.6 of rfc2440bis-12: (Note I removed the leading two blanks from each line) -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Version: OpenPrivacy 0.99 yDgBO22WxBHv7O8X7O/jygAEzol56iUKiXmV+XmpCtmpqQUKiQrFqclFqUDBovzS vBSFjNSiVHsuAA== =njUN -END PGP

Re: Other hashes with DSA keys

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 05:02:21 -0600, John Clizbe said: > I don't know that "extended the standard" is the language I'd use. More to > the point would be "second guessed the IETF OpenPGP WG". Did they even > meet at last week's IETF meeting? The current draft, rfc2440bis-12, > expires in May of this

Re: Other hashes with DSA keys

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johan Wevers wrote: > Hello, > > Now that PGP 9 beta seems to have extended the standard to allow non-160 bit > hashes to be used with DSA keys, isn't it time for GnuPG to do the same, > especially after the recent attacks on SHA-1? I know it's agains

Re: GnuPG + Smartcard

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:19:43 +0900, Kory T said: > the list know whether it's possible to import off-card generated keys > into OpenPGP Card which are larger than 1024bits? I now know that the > card is only capable of 'generating' 1024bit keys on the card, but > there should be enough space to s

Re: Other hashes with DSA keys

On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:17:01 +0100 (MET), Johan Wevers said: > Now that PGP 9 beta seems to have extended the standard to allow non-160 bit > hashes to be used with DSA keys, isn't it time for GnuPG to do the same, Their beta seems to use a truncated hash; it is not intended behaviour. > And whi

Re: GnuPG + Smartcard

Thanks for the help Robert. That HOWTO was very helpful. I hope more documentation like this will pop up on the net. It's been really hard to find info on the OpenPGP card implementation. I've been searching around the net for an answer to whether it's possible to use large keys on smartca

Re: Differences between 1.2.2 and 1.4.1rc2. was: Help with v1.4.0.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Maj. Dennis Bludnok, Ret. wrote: > Thanks for the help so far everyone. > I've been able to download the new version from a different network. > I think the firewall at my office doesn't like FTP sites. > > My other question was: > Is the old version

Differences between 1.2.2 and 1.4.1rc2. was: Help with v1.4.0.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for the help so far everyone. I've been able to download the new version from a different network. I think the firewall at my office doesn't like FTP sites. My other question was: Is the old version I have at the moment vulnerable to any att