On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:17:01 +0100 (MET), Johan Wevers said: > Now that PGP 9 beta seems to have extended the standard to allow non-160 bit > hashes to be used with DSA keys, isn't it time for GnuPG to do the same,
Their beta seems to use a truncated hash; it is not intended behaviour. > And while this is being provessed, Tiger might be re-included too, since the > arguments against its 192 bits size are then no longer relevant. Tiger is not part of OpenPGP. Replacing well known algorithms with obscure ones is not a solid way to solve possible security problems. Shalom-Salam, Werner _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users