* David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:04:20PM +0100, Marcus Frings wrote:
>> First of all, what is actually the difference between "pgp" and >> "classic"? The first option tells about WOT and trust signatures but the >> latter just mentions the WOT. > That is the difference. The "pgp" trust model is identical to > "classic" except that "pgp" supports trust signatures, and "classic" > doesn't (it treats them the same as any other signature). > I'm not quite sure what you're asking. Sorry for the misunderstanding, my problem was that I wasn't aware of the new option "tsign" which is new in 1.4.0. After reading the info about "tsign" in the manpage I understand the difference now. [...] >> when "pgp" is supposed to be the default? I cannot remember that I have >> ever changed the trust model. I guess I should switch over to "pgp", >> right? > You probably were using GnuPG 1.2.x or earlier before you upgraded to > 1.4. In this case, your trustdb was created as "classic", and so > GnuPG 1.4 is just respecting that. If you want to force an upgrade to > "pgp", do Yes, this was an upgrade from 1.2 to 1.4, I have changed to trust-model "pgp" now although I don't use these trust signatures at the moment. Regards, Marcus -- "Ich bewundere die konzeptionelle Reinheit... Geschaffen, um zu überleben... Kein Gewissen beeinflusst es, es kennt keine Schuld oder Wahnvorstellungen ethischer Art." _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
