Sorry for the break of thread, the HTML view doesn't show the
Message-Id for me to refer to.
I was thinking of writing up an ebuild recipe for gentoo, that would
have a whole lot in common with Daniel's excellent openwrt Makefile.
To avoid further duplication I can imagine it would be practical if
Jeff, thanks for great feedback and the great news that you
are working on GNS for Tor. I had a long debate on social
networking over Tor early this year where the discussion
led us to theorizing using more GNUnet routing in the
hidden service backend, possibly including multicast for
scalability,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:23:10PM -0700, Ed Baskerville wrote:
> An appealing narrative, but I don't buy it. Let's say the distributed social
> network gains traction among on libre platforms. Then your plan is to
> implement a jailbreaking tool that iPhone users will install in order to
> conn
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:21:30AM +0200, Samer wrote:
> This is an invitation to the GNUnet project, to submit an abstract (750
> words) for a book on the use of decentralized FLOSS for communities. We
> believe you are doing great work and we’d love to have your thoughts on
> this project as part
There is a meeting on the topic of doing secushare GUIs
in Berlin today. Ask in our chatroom if you're in town.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:46:24AM +0300, LRN wrote:
> How are you going to call it? How about WhatsGNU? :)
Also a possibility.
See www.secushare.org for more.
--
E-mail is public!
On 02/15/2016 12:11 PM, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> RESTful GNUnet
>
> Design and implementation of REST APIs (http://jsonapi.org/) that
> expose the GNUnet API (https://gnunet.org/doxygen/modules.html) so that
> easy, hands-on development is possible. Also, browser-based UIs will be
> much easie
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:04:01PM +0200, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Why are you specifying it to HTTP-based at all?
Are all browsers able to use localhost bus solutions and sockets?
> I believe a *re-usable* JSON-RPC, which could either be accessed via
> HTTP but just as well using a local socket or
Hello again, Dan & Martin!
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:48:10PM +0200, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Great. We already have an extensive jspsyc library that we used in
> > the psyczilla add-on for mozilla. It uses native sockets.
>
> That's the kinda stuff I was thinking of. JSON is useful beyond HTTP.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 01:01:01PM +0100, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> At this point, if your GNUnet node does not expose the API over REST
> you are welcome to use sockets/custom JSON-RPC in your code for mobile
> (Android) and browser (JS) but then say hello to the year 1998.
> Today, apps commun
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:26:02PM +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> GNU has been approved by Google to participate in GSoC 2016. For GNUnet,
> we have currently four ideas proposed. If you are interested in working
> on these, let us know. Also, if you want to point other people to
Thanks Martin for the in-depth reply.
Thanks Andrew for the good news that dbus does not do XML all the time. ;)
I would like to suggest one more GSoC job to submit:
Fix the following bugs so we can release GNUnet:
https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=3994
https://gnunet.org/b
I just noticed this bugfix. Thanks, Bart, for finding it!
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 08:38:45PM +0200, gnu...@gnunet.org wrote:
>if (size != ntohs (msg->size))
>{
> LOG (GNUNET_ERROR_TYPE_WARNING,
> - "UDP malformed message header from %s\n",
> + "UDP malformed message (s
I just noticed this bugfix. Thanks, Bart, for finding it!
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 08:38:45PM +0200, gnu...@gnunet.org wrote:
>if (size != ntohs (msg->size))
>{
> LOG (GNUNET_ERROR_TYPE_WARNING,
> - "UDP malformed message header from %s\n",
> + "UDP malformed message (s
) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.1.1
Le 01/07/2016 à 14:02, carlo von lynX a écrit :
> Just thought.. strange.. Aymeric never bails out of a discussion,
> and guess what, I overlooked his reply! Here we go.
Maybe we can continue off the list since the discussion is going into
specific d
This summer I reported https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=4625
> For many kinds of applications we need to authenticate incoming connections
> as coming from a certain person or at least from a certain peer. The exit
> daemon is currently not providing a way to find out who is calling. Resolvin
Hello Martin, long time no see.
Sorry if this sounded like a rant, I'm just surprised that
after six years gnunet and secushare still don't know each
other as well as they should...
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 06:46:36PM +0100, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> Yes, this is what reverse resolution is for.
> Definitively not. Neither the psycstore nor the existing
> namestore/namecache have the operation needed for what Martin is
> thinking about on the blog. However, the operation *you* are thinking
> about would be local.
Yes, doing it locally is the proper way to do it and
requiring people to ex
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 11:20:45PM +0100, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> I see now that the public part does not fit into social/psyc. But I do
No, no. It is no problem to do public applications using pubsub,
but I see no constructive use case for your technological idea.
> not fully agree with you
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 01:02:30PM +0100, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> Hmm can you explain why you think that? I think what he tried to say is
> that basically GNS delegations are not needed in the secushare design
> as rendezvous/places are used for introductions leading to .gnu
> names anyway. al
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 04:51:03PM +0100, carlo von lynX wrote:
> You made a political statement about any computer having a right to
> communicate with any other computer, no matter if there is any social
> connection between the owners.
It is the foundation of a whole new class o
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 06:29:40PM +0100, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> Okay got. But then you don't need GNS. As in: at all.
There is certainly a lot of conceptual duplication, but then
again there are constellations where GNS makes more sense
than distributed pubsubs. We found in one particular
[OT] First of all, sorry if anything I write ends up sounding
unlike the easy peacy chilled out way it sounds when I write it up.
I have a bad habit of pushing people verbally, put it is always
meant in a constructive motivating way... which I know can easily
backfire.. it's a problem of the Intern
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 09:57:12PM +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> Carlo, the paper Martin send me about this is this one:
>
> http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.131.9709&rep=rep1&type=pdf
>
> So it's neither exactly internal to the cooperation nor simple
> authentication
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:30:37PM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> This sounds interesting.
Yes, Daniel.. keep up that good work you are doing!
> 3. What would be the difference to for example IoTvity, openHAB and
> other existing solutions?
Haven't seen an answer from Daniel and maybe you find
t
news: secushare participated at fiffkon with a nice booth:
http://secushare.cheettyiapsyciew.onion/img/fiffkon2016.jpeg
and we discussed with visitors a lot about the broken and
the gnu internet, driven by the illustration that puts the
two in comparison:
http://secushare.cheettyiapsyci
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:28:19PM +0100, Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
> For decentralization - this is worh loking:
> https://safenetforum.org/t/maidsafe-and-gnunet-comparison/2779.
Huh.. there is no description of gnunet on that page at all.
dirvine explains some things of maidsafe that sound like th
Picking up an old thread since there has been some misunderstanding
of what was said here:
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 03:50:19PM +0200, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> On 05/05/2016 02:29 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Hi everyone!
> >
> > I got a bunch of questions about the subsystems mentioned above:
>
Hello eternal traveller!
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 10:59:53AM +0100, hellekin wrote:
> On 12/01/2016 07:27 PM, carlo von lynX wrote:
> >
> > http://secushare.cheettyiapsyciew.onion/broken-internet
>
> Nice. Why is faceboogle yellow? Is that to say it's compatible o
Strange, why on Earth would spamassassin put the two replies to the
mail into the SPAM folder?
> pts rule name description
> -- --
> 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBLRBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org
> 1
I received the offer from Humboldt University
to host an YBTI/WeFix... type of event at their
facilities just after new year's eve. How many
of you hackers are planning to spend NYE in
Berlin and would like to meet people interested
in what we are doing?
We can do talks, workshops, hack sessions..
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:39:37AM +0100, Jeff Burdges wrote:
> I'm in Berlin for NYE, so I'm available the 1st and 2nd, but I leave
> early on 3 January.
Sorry for late reply.. I wasn't getting feedback from my
university contact.. looks like the room assignment office
is closed until January, t
The domains do indeed look somewhat neat, but I'm not
sceptic regarding first-come-first-served systems that
soon become useless if all cool words and brands are
squatted.. I think a heuristic what the majority of the
social network thinks that "CNN" is would be more
accurate in leading people to a
It is up to us to decide whether we want GNUnet to be easily
abusable like Android, or offer at least Affero style protection
to its users. I raised the worry and Christian first asked RMS
for an opinion before we'd bring it here. After some debate, RMS
concluded that he'll leave it to us to de
> I support the change to AGPL3.
Since no argumentation against the change has
surfaced, I guess we can proceed.
--
E-mail is public! Talk to me in private using encryption:
http://loupsycedyglgamf.onion/LynX/
irc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion:67/lynX
https://psyced.org:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 02:56:49PM +0200, Jeff Burdges wrote:
> I think Matrix is broadly considered promising, but afaik they cannot do
> anything high latency, so metadata leakage galore.
Matrix is federated, like XMPP, like e-mail, like Mastodon.
Like all federated technologies it will only st
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 08:10:41PM +0200, Jeff Burdges wrote:
> I donno if that article should be taken too seriously, but it suggest
Certainly not. Just because one journalist doesn't miss
any of his friends when going social, that doesn't mean
everyone is anti-social as he is.
> the many major
Just in case you have heard of a swiss iniative to replace
BGP called SCION, https://www.scion-architecture.net - it,
too, is presented like a replacement for the current
Internet. I found this passage in the FAQ interesting:
> Is SCION a source-routed architecture?
>
> Source routing does not sc
Could someone who knows how libtool works please
fix https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=5078 so
that gnunet can be packaged for distributions with
a working GNS? Right now it's a blocker. It should
be really easy for anyone familiar with libtool
(not me). I don't think we should release a gnunet
t
Thanksalot. Your git fork has been merged!
Thanks also for figuring out that silly crasher in gnunet-social.
See you in the chat... :)
--
E-mail is public! Talk to me in private using encryption:
http://loupsycedyglgamf.onion/LynX/
irc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion:67/lynX
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:26:39PM +0200, t3sserakt wrote:
> 1. On which days you will be at the CCC congress (please mark with x):
>
> - 27th
> - 28th
> - 29th
> - 30th
all
> 2. Would you be interested on participating a GNUnet all hands meeting
> for some days. Let us know how many days you wo
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 05:42:45PM +0200, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> 2) Yes, running in the 'global' network with outdated peers is likely to
> cause all kinds of fun problems, as the DHT may or may not work, or in
> the worst case the DHT discovers a path which then does not work on the
> CADET l
Pardon the lack of democracy but the strategy department has chosen
that this year we squat the European Commission's hackerspace...
Therefore, this year's YBTI/WeMakeUsAGNUOne is called ...
https://events.ccc.de/congress/2017/wiki/index.php/Assembly:NGI
Please edit and sabotage to your liking.
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 12:08:23PM +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> "NOTE: Creating Self organized Sessions isn't possible right now. Please
> try it later. :)"
The situation was similar at the 30c3. I had already
collected something like 10 talks in a wiki table
on the assembly page before I wa
Mary Xmas!
https://events.ccc.de/congress/2017/wiki/index.php/Assembly:NGI
now boasts with several sessions. Bernd has made
some large ones on 29th while we made some on 27th
because not everyone is available on the 29th.
Please feel invited to give us your input and
latest news on the 29th (by m
Welcome to the little GNUnet world!
I've seen fine and appetizing commits regarding gnunet-guile.
Thank you!
In former times, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> There is also a real-time or near realtime aspect that I would
> like to tackle. I could come up with the naming scheme that will
> allow to pul
This time there aren't dozens of things keeping me from
answering in due time! :) Sorry for the delay regarding
pubsub.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 01:07:08AM +0100, amirouche wrote:
> I got into creating a new logo for gnunet
> logos and mockup at https://imgur.com/a/ZOjNU
Fabulous. I didn't dare
Martin, we are the minority of people who accepted
the gnu on the web... maybe we want to extend our
audience to the people that think that such a home-
grown logo doesn't stand for professionality? Same
goes for the terrible Taler logo? Let Amirouche'
creativity go wild, it is going in a totally u
Martin, excellent: a CADET logo! :D
This guix-derived logo is amazing. For the print version
it's enough to remove the backlight effect, so no big deal.
So from my understanding of logo design this thing is compliant.
Krumelmonster's are also very neat, but I perceive
the gnu as too prominent -
Just when I wanted to remind the user of the
surveillance IRC that they can get anonymous
git notifications if they log into psyced.org
and issue '+subscribe git' from within #gnunet.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:59:34PM +, n...@crash.cx wrote:
> > remote: WARNING: repo-specific-hooks:
> > '/hom
I generally welcome this new development, although
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 08:45:51AM +0100, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> > 1) IETF doesn't want us to use those, having rejected our draft for 4+
> > years now, so clearly trying to play nice doesn't work.
Which isn't surprising at all that they g
I think I remember that either the answer is no, or that
the way GNUnet uses its DHT ensures that it is not a problem.
I am asking to know whether it is an aspect we need to keep
an eye on when designing new DHT apps, given the terrible
experiences seen with the Tor, Retroshare and Bittorrent
proj
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:45:06PM +0200, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> I think this is the time where I have to disclose a major unfortunate
> development (but which may be resolved soon without too much drama).
So how did it end?
> Thus, I think that choosing a logo that may remotely resemble a l
Ladies and gentlemen,
from the heights of the swiss mountains comes
a sense of decentralised consensus regarding
the beauty of things.
I picked one of amirouche's most promosing
designs (thanks for the svg!), changed the
horns and head to look a bit more like a
gnu and less like a 'V', changed so
Thanks for the kind words or rather.. I'm glad
you're agreeing with us on most of this!
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 09:20:58AM +0200, hyazin...@emailn.de wrote:
> I'm wondering a bit about the text not being 'GNUnet', but 'gnu:net'. Wasn't
> consensus in case of text application, that it should be 'G
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:55:26PM +0200, Phil Buschmann wrote:
> the last mails on this mailing list discussed design of the logo and the
> website but I was thinking of another important design question:
> As it is kind of my work to design a website for the rest API of GNUnet
> (GSoC), I want to
Received this message from a supporter:
hey, I lack the time to chase this and I figure you have the right
contacts to chase this, googling gnunet from the UK (you can try via
google.co.uk) yields uk.gnunet.org as the first result.
which wouldn't seem so bad, but combined with t
You may find this off-topic but I find it
motivating to not give up the fight.
___
GNUnet-developers mailing list
GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
Moxie's recent blog post is making the rounds:
https://signal.org/blog/sealed-sender/
(You may not need to read it to make sense of this mail).
In the case of Signal it still has two defects: the way the
clients always talk to the same server over the same TLS
connection, so the cloud service is t
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 10:06:36PM +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> TLDR: one could do this, but would likely be bad for performance and to
> achieve strong privacy we need it on another layer.
Excellent and convincing argumentation as always.
Thank you.
___
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 07:40:15PM +0100, amirouche wrote:
> This is a follow up thread about my attempt to build a peer-to-peer graph
> database on top of gnunet. My initial thoughts are documented at [0].
> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnunet/2014-01/msg0.html
Oh, couple of ye
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:55:56AM +0100, amirouche wrote:
> tl;dr: yes, I would like to join the secushare effort.
good summary, as it is a long read below :D
sorry for delay... other things on my mind...
other secusharors are welcome to chip into this conversation!!
> There might be a confusio
One month late, but what do you expect from a guy gone arty.
> > ### 1: How might I "serve" files?
Should secushare step out of its unvoluntary condition of
vaporware, then there would be a pub-sub API which actively
pushes content to all subscribers (unlike the humbug they've
put into IPFS in th
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 03:23:48PM +, Olie Ayre wrote:
> Thanks for taking time to answer my questions! "Late" or otherwise, they're
> still helpful :)
GReat!
> The "pub-sub" approach makes a lot of sense. I think you explaining that sort
> of helped it
> click. So if I'm understanding corr
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:44:26AM +0200, rexxnor wrote:
> Due to popular demand from the people at camp I submitted a self
> organized session for the camp.
That's heartwarming to see. <3
Saturday I have to be downtown
pretty much immediately after the
time of that session.
Unlikely I'll make i
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 12:20:34PM +0100, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> We are delighted to announce that ICANN has invited the GNUnet project to
> speak at the next ICANN Annual General Meeting [1]. We have been invited to
> join a panel discussion on Emerging Internet Identifier Technologies in
Why Anna? Because Alice sounds too much like it's about crypto!
Greetings from the secushare workshop. We're discussing the
implications of the protocol design bug regarding that Alice
(Anna) or Betty logic by which if the channel breaks and
Betty wants to re-open it, then she can't actually do an
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 10:28:02PM +0900, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> That sounds like it allows anyone to highjack any (established) channel
> after a successful kx.
Oh, transport does not guarantee the identity of nodes so CADET
has to handle authentication itself... great. Still, an attacker
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:36:21PM +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> gtk+: I'm still undecided ;-).
Since most of GNUnet apps have nothing to do with file sharing,
all of file sharing would deserve its own repo. That implies
a split of gnunet-gtk.
> > - Is "messenger" a part of "secushare"?
>
>
Sorry if as usual I sounded more harsh/bitter than I actually am.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:54:49AM +0900, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> We do have a "hidden" roadmap (not 100% up to date anymore):
> https://gnunet.org/en/roadmap.html
We have one as well… similarly hidden:
https://secushare.org/p
That sounds pretty awesome!!! Does it also work in the wild
or only within testbed simulations? Does it have any sorts
of server component or does it manage to distribute state
in the gnunet?
The feature list sounds a lot like things that were supposed
to go into secushare but we didn't get there
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 04:09:17PM +0100, TheJackiMonster wrote:
> I'm not currently sure if we should use JSON (which is more common in
> current web) or use PSYC (which would be more efficient). The service
> itself should allow both, so this would probably be something to decide
> on application
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 06:55:21PM +0100, TheJackiMonster wrote:
> Files will most likely be shared through the FS submodule of GNUnet.
> They get encrypted and the key for decryption gets shared through the
> messenger service. That's quite similar to the implementation of
> Threema except this is
Good morning!
> > Super inefficient for small pieces of data I would assume,
> > and introducing so much latency that in the end it feels
> > slower than using the web. When simple things arrive in-band
> > you can display them immediately. I'd rather use FS for
> > things >1M.
On Sat, Mar 06, 20
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 12:23:31PM +0100, TheJackiMonster wrote:
> Waiting for the completion of a message is far worse for most users
> than looking at dynamic previews or states from my experience. Because
> you can't expect the people to be physically separated while
> sending/receiving a messag
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:38:56PM +0100, Lukas Schmidt wrote:
> >>> Sure, you could argue that most centralized services probably just
> >>> visualize an option of deletion or modification while keeping the
> >>> old
> >>> state stored anyway. But I would like to actually provide this
> >>> functi
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 02:06:21PM +0200, Tobias Platen wrote:
> I'm interested in contibuting to gnunet-secushare, so I tried joining the
> chat on psyced.org. But that one does not work.
>
> Secure Connection Failed
>
> An error occurred during a connection to psyced.org:3. SSL received a
Tobias, so happy to hear that your hands-on on the matter! Everything
t3sserakt warns about is unfortunately true - after all the effort put
into those subsystems we don't know if they have a chance of delivering
what we need at any happy point in the future. Some additional thoughts
on what t3sser
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 10:29:02AM +0200, TheJackiMonster wrote:
> Because the messenger service was mentioned I thought I could try to
> clarify. I'm unsure if it's the proper back-end for secushare but
> technically speaking you can just think of it as layer on top of CADET
> to form groups using
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:05:06AM +0200, carlo von lynX wrote:
> The circular topology of end points *does* satisfy the secushare
> expectations on privacy and metadata privacy in particular AFAICT,
> so that's very cool.
Whoopsa I'm posting faster than I am thinking, sorry. N
As much as I notoriously doubt that the end-to-end
encryption Whatsapp actually stops agencies from
having any insight, I appreciate Moxie's recent dive
into the world of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs):
https://moxie.org/2022/01/07/web3-first-impressions.html
I heard similar doubts from CCC people la
Heya Jeff, happy new year...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 03:52:41PM +0100, Jeff Burdges wrote:
> Moxie loves talking about platforms vs protocols, but really only legacy
> cruft like Bitcoin and Ethereum adopted this non-upgradeable protocol
> bullshit fairy tails, and even Ethereum wants to upgrade
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 07:49:48PM +0100, Jeff Burdges wrote:
> I’ve forgotten what PSYC does.. I vaguely recall key values pairs ala HTML..
> I’ve no real idea why a key-value abstraction helps in messaging.
Check out t3sserakt's talk explaining modeling
the many facets of visibility of profil
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 09:03:36AM +0100, Tobias Platen wrote:
> I had a quick look at the gnunet psycstore, which is part of the
> musticast implementation. ASSIGN is already implemented,
Thank you for taking a look. Oh yes, I find it should really
be called musticast rather than multicast.. ;)
Hello Loki!
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:55:02AM +0200, Loki Schmidt (They/Them) wrote:
> https://git.gnunet.org/bibliography.git/plain/docs/gnunet-psyc.pdf
>
> I have always been curious about the multicast implementation of
> PSYC, does it run on top of CADET or is it a parallel service or is
> i
Thank you, madmurphy! I think several of the gnunet
CLI tools need improvements of this kind, actually.
I vaguely remember doing similar edits somewhere -
making outputs friendly to parse.
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 08:09:02AM +, madmurphy wrote:
>1. What do you think about the fact that I ha
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 12:49:07PM +0530, valdaarhun wrote:
> Or how's the idea of writing a new communicator plugin for
> TNG? For eg., a plugin for XMPP [4]? I am not sure if this needed
> in GNUnet. I thought I would put my idea out there to get some
> feedback.
I tried to pretend not having se
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 02:15:02PM +, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> This release marks a noteworthy milestone in that it includes a
> completely new transport layer.
Congrats!!!
> - There are known major design issues in the CORE subsystems which
> will need to be addressed in the future
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 10:30:07AM +0200, em...@msavoritias.me wrote:
> XMPP can work fine through p2p. Its just not being done a lot because of
> other reasons i can expand if needed.
Yes, you can rewrite any protocol radically enough to cook rice
or iron your shirts but then you are really just
Moin Martin,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 06:26:09AM +, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> - Hiding in "common" Internet traffic: e.g. if two peers communicate
> via HTTPS (and assuming we can obfuscate the traffic patterns of the
> applications in GNUnet), they look like browser/web server to an
> atta
Hi Sahil,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 02:37:36AM +0530, Sahil wrote:
> This looks very interesting. "Multicast distribution trees" is a new topic for
> me. I'll read up on this too.
It's the way how cloud technologies achieve scalability, and it is
the biggest failure of the free world that it let fr
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 01:26:18PM +0530, Sahil wrote:
> Sorry for the delayed response. I was trying to wrap my head around
> this.
That's the most noble thing to say and all the reason why
asynchronous messaging was invented in the first place. :)
> Thank you for your reply. I am able to make
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 02:32:51PM +0200, MSavoritias wrote:
> - XMPP uses the XEP 0313 which is basically a protocol to retrieve messages.
> Where these messages stored is left as an exercise to the reader although
> most people use servers including secushare it seems which made my interest
> in
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 04:19:21PM +0200, MSavoritias wrote:
> By servers I mean a separate machine that is used to run services non
> graphically that usually needs to be always online.
No, there are machines that *need* to be online, but there are
always human beings that *like* to have machines
> On 3/16/24 17:08, carlo von lynX wrote:
> > No, there are machines that *need* to be online, but there are
> > always human beings that *like* to have machines always online
> > even if they don't need it for GNUnet.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 07:54:56PM +0200, MSavor
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 06:25:45PM +0200, Valentin Gagarin wrote:
> curl -L https://nixos.org/nix/install | sh -s -- --daemon
Blind execution of something potentially corrupted coming
from the Internet, and by use of a pipe you don't even have
a way to retroactively find out if your system has
95 matches
Mail list logo
