On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:04:01PM +0200, Daniel Golle wrote: > Why are you specifying it to HTTP-based at all?
Are all browsers able to use localhost bus solutions and sockets? > I believe a *re-usable* JSON-RPC, which could either be accessed via > HTTP but just as well using a local socket or existing message-passing > systems like ubus, dbus, ... would be better and avoid duplicate work. Great. We already have an extensive jspsyc library that we used in the psyczilla add-on for mozilla. It uses native sockets. > Generally sounds great, but as PSYC is real-time only, what if the Huh! Where did you read that? Would I suggest to use PSYC as a mail system if this was true? > node on the other side is currently offline? Eg. I generally like > to have everything turned-off while I'm sleeping, safe energy and > bandwidth in hours where it obviously can only harm (ie. disturb > my sleep with blinkenlights or harddrive noises). However, people > do send emails to me while I'm sleeping and I do appreciate to > receive them (once I'm awake). Correct me if I'm missing something, but > to me it seems as this cannot be achieved with PSYC, right? The question is answered on http://secushare.org/architecture The answer is, yes. PSYC can. _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list GNUnet-developers@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
