>
> Is gnome absolutely necessary? can KDE replace those features?
> I'm all for GTK, but given that usually it's usually either/or for
> KDE/GNOME, I'd rather not have to add GNOME to a KDE system just
> for gnucash.
We use a lot of gnome (not gtk) code, so we can't really ditch it.
Some of the
>
>
> It seems like the two big systems are KDE and GNOME. It shouldn't be
> that hard to nearly fully accomodate a KDE desktop by just adding some
> code for the things like session management that won't work at all
> without KDE specific code. #ifdefed code like that, I'm all in favor
>
Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While I am all in favour of a KDE version of gnucash, if somebody
> wants to code at it, it might be wise to consider the legal issues
> *before* we get too far down the road to do anything about it.
Actually I wasn't thinking about that. Haven
Has somebody thought about the licensing hassles that the KDE version
creates?
It's been hashed out ad infinitum on the Debian lists, and, as
I remember it, if we want to link to QT (even Qt 2.0) in such a way
that is binary-redistributable, we need to:
a) Change to a new licence
or, more reali
teri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's where the momentum is, so you're probably right. I was thinking
> from the point of view of those with Linux distributions (admittedly a
> minority) that come without gnome (ie: caldera/kde). As it is now,
> since the features are included unevenly and
>
> teri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > At least I wanted to make sure that the important people here (those
> > doing the work, for which I'm very grateful, even though I haven't
> > been able to run the qt version yet) know of this option.
>
> Thanks for the info. Actually, I knew a
teri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At least I wanted to make sure that the important people here (those
> doing the work, for which I'm very grateful, even though I haven't
> been able to run the qt version yet) know of this option.
Thanks for the info. Actually, I knew about wxWindows, but ove
> On Mon, 3 Jan 100 11:58:34 -0500 (EST), teri
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
teri> www.wxwindows.org for the details. Wx uses the underlying
teri> windowing system (I've been using gtk under both KDE and Gnome
teri> and msw in windows 9x and NT). Yes it's a lowest common
teri> denominato
> ...
>
> There *do* exist independent tools for "kicking out" Qt and GTK UI's;
> they don't interoperate, and since the models are fairly different, it
> seems not too likely that this will be created.
All this talk about GTK, QT, windows, gnome, etc... has me wondering,
has no one heard of
Rob Walker writes:
> >> The only reasons I was talking about using qt was because I thought
> >> that QT was the only toolkit which ran under windows and because I
> >> was hoping to stave _that_ whole argument off before it happened,
> >> and to keep the two GUIs in sync with each other in
> On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 08:20:08 -0600, Christopher Browne
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Christopher> Why *precisely* do you think it is vastly important to
Christopher> simultaneously use multiple GUI toolkits?
1. using Qt is the only way that I know of for us to have a windows
version
On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:30:50 PST, the world broke into rejoicing as
Rob Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 01:12:16 -0600, Christopher Browne
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> what are the IDEs which kick out both gtk and qt code? maybe I should
> take a stab a
Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this begs the question:
>
> Why *precisely* do you think it is vastly important to simultaneously
> use multiple GUI toolkits?
>
> I don't see there being any technical merit to the idea; having to
> conform to two GUIs at the same ti
> This approach would be fairly compatible with the notion of writing up
> GUIs using Glade, and implementing using libGlade. libGlade reads in
> the GTK GUI representation in XML form, which means that if you wanted
> to have several visibly different GUIs, you might create:
> a) GnuCash-gui
> On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 01:12:16 -0600, Christopher Browne
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
what are the IDEs which kick out both gtk and qt code? maybe I should
take a stab at each of them.
>> Write the UI with an UI editor, with an UI editor which could kick
>> out both QT and gnome, and t
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999 16:19:04 PST, the world broke into rejoicing as
Rob Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Fri, 31 Dec 1999 12:39:55 -0800, Dave Peticolas
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Dave> I think 'enter' should mean 'commit and move down one row', just
> Dave> like in Quic
16 matches
Mail list logo
