>
>
> It seems like the two big systems are KDE and GNOME. It shouldn't be
> that hard to nearly fully accomodate a KDE desktop by just adding some
> code for the things like session management that won't work at all
> without KDE specific code. #ifdefed code like that, I'm all in favor
> of.
Yes! The most immediate thing is to add a "make kde" option and
appropriate configure checks for kde && !gnome so it builds and
runs (possibly at first without the gnome features or the replacement
kde code).
>...
>
> Make qt has never been a fully functional system. Right now it barely
> does anything so anyone wanting to do QT/KDE completely would be
> looking at a *lot* of work. That's why I think it'd be better to
> stick with GTK and GNOME for the graphics and add KDE support where
Is gnome absolutely necessary? can KDE replace those features?
I'm all for GTK, but given that usually it's usually either/or for
KDE/GNOME, I'd rather not have to add GNOME to a KDE system just
for gnucash.
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
