On May 31, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On Saturday 18 May 2013 09:39:26 John Ralls wrote:
> > What ids do we want? I suggest:
> >
> > core (engine, backends, budgets, build, python, SX, general)
> > import (also export)
> > UI (register, general UI)
> > business
> > reports (incl
On Saturday 18 May 2013 09:39:26 John Ralls wrote:
> What ids do we want? I suggest:
>
> core (engine, backends, budgets, build, python, SX, general)
> import (also export)
> UI (register, general UI)
> business
> reports (includes check printing)
> mac
> win
> documentation (includes translation
On May 20, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> John Ralls writes:
>
>> No problem, there are lots of hidden corners in Bugzilla!
>>
>> Once the fake ids are made, log in to Bugzilla and select
>> 'Preferences' from the links across the top of the page. Select the
>> 'Email Preferences' ta
John Ralls writes:
> No problem, there are lots of hidden corners in Bugzilla!
>
> Once the fake ids are made, log in to Bugzilla and select
> 'Preferences' from the links across the top of the page. Select the
> 'Email Preferences' tag and scroll down to 'User Watching', where you
> can enter th
I've submitted the request:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700601
Regards,
John Ralls
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013, 13:24:35 schrieb John Ralls:
> On May 18, 2013, at 1:12 PM, Christian Stimming
wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013, 11:28:05 schrieb John Ralls:
> >> On May 18, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Geert Janssens
> >>
> >
> > wrote:
> >>> Let me try again. It seems my mailer or the list
On May 18, 2013, at 1:12 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013, 11:28:05 schrieb John Ralls:
>> On May 18, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>>> Let me try again. It seems my mailer or the list manager has serious
>>> issues with to html formatted mails. I don't eve
Am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013, 11:28:05 schrieb John Ralls:
> On May 18, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Geert Janssens
wrote:
> > Let me try again. It seems my mailer or the list manager has serious
> > issues with to html formatted mails. I don't even see my own answer in
> > the previous mail... Were others abl
On May 18, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Let me try again. It seems my mailer or the list manager has serious issues
> with to html formatted mails. I don't even see my own answer in the previous
> mail...
> Were others able to read it ?
>
> So what I basically replied was this:
Let me try again. It seems my mailer or the list manager has
serious issues with to html formatted mails. I don't even see
my own answer in the previous mail...
Were others able to read it ?
So what I basically replied was this:
Those are mostly fine with me. I was considering making
general a
On Saturday 18 May 2013 09:39:26 John Ralls wrote:
On May 18, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Geert Janssens
wrote:
On Saturday 18 May 2013 08:54:56 John Ralls wrote:
On May 18, 2013, at 2:04 AM, Geert Janssens <_janssens-geert@telenet.be_> wrote:
On Monday 18 February 2013 17:09:20 John Ralls wrot
On May 18, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On Saturday 18 May 2013 08:54:56 John Ralls wrote:
>
>
> On May 18, 2013, at 2:04 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>
> On Monday 18 February 2013 17:09:20 John Ralls wrote:
> > The default assignee field is mostly used to determine who gets bugma
On Saturday 18 May 2013 08:54:56 John Ralls wrote:
On May 18, 2013, at 2:04 AM, Geert Janssens
wrote:
On Monday 18 February 2013 17:09:20 John Ralls wrote:
> The default assignee field is mostly used to determine who gets bugmail for
> a particular component. Some of the assignments make se
On May 18, 2013, at 2:04 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On Monday 18 February 2013 17:09:20 John Ralls wrote:
> > The default assignee field is mostly used to determine who gets bugmail for
> > a particular component. Some of the assignments make sense, like having me
> > be the default for Mac bug
On Monday 18 February 2013 17:09:20 John Ralls wrote:
> The default assignee field is mostly used to determine who gets bugmail for
> a particular component. Some of the assignments make sense, like having me
> be the default for Mac bugs, some not so much, like Chris Shoemaker for
> budget bugs: H
Op 24-02-13 10:53, Christian Stimming schreef:
Am Samstag, 23. Februar 2013, 08:56:12 schrieb John Ralls:
The mainstream Gnome approach is to have fake users for default
assignees; for example, the Gtk Quartz backend has
gtk-quartz-ma...@gnome.bugs, which I watch so that I get bug mail for
any o
Am Samstag, 23. Februar 2013, 08:56:12 schrieb John Ralls:
> >> The mainstream Gnome approach is to have fake users for default
> >> assignees; for example, the Gtk Quartz backend has
> >> gtk-quartz-ma...@gnome.bugs, which I watch so that I get bug mail for
> >> any of those. I propose doing the s
On Feb 23, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 17:09:20 schrieb John Ralls:
>> The default assignee field is mostly used to determine who gets bugmail for
>> a particular component. Some of the assignments make sense, like having me
>> be the default for Ma
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 17:09:20 schrieb John Ralls:
> The default assignee field is mostly used to determine who gets bugmail for
> a particular component. Some of the assignments make sense, like having me
> be the default for Mac bugs, some not so much, like Chris Shoemaker for
> budget bug
Mike Evans writes:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:07:02 -0500
> Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> Mike Evans writes:
>>
>> > I see a new bug (Bug 693948) assigned to Mark Jenkins and as QA
>> > contact. I don't think Mark is actively developing anymore(?).
>> > Having assignee and QA as the same person proba
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:07:02 -0500
Derek Atkins wrote:
> Mike Evans writes:
>
> > I see a new bug (Bug 693948) assigned to Mark Jenkins and as QA
> > contact. I don't think Mark is actively developing anymore(?).
> > Having assignee and QA as the same person probably isn't a good
> > idea eithe
Mike Evans writes:
> I see a new bug (Bug 693948) assigned to Mark Jenkins and as QA contact.
> I don't think Mark is actively developing anymore(?). Having assignee
> and QA as the same person probably isn't a good idea either.
I don't even know who Mark Jenkins is! He's certainly not a GnuCa
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:05:31 -0800
John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:43 PM, Chris Shoemaker
> wrote:
>
> > +1 ;)
>
> Well, well. Don't you get stiff lurking behind that fern? ;-)
>
> Regards,
> John Ralls
>
> [1]
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced;bug_
On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:43 PM, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> +1 ;)
Well, well. Don't you get stiff lurking behind that fern? ;-)
Regards,
John Ralls
[1]
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED;bug_status=NEW;bug_status=ASSIGNED;bug_status=REOPENED;bug_st
+1 ;)
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 05:09:20PM -0800, John Ralls wrote:
> The default assignee field is mostly used to determine who gets bugmail for a
> particular component. Some of the assignments make sense, like having me be
> the default for Mac bugs, some not so much, like Chris Shoemaker for b
The default assignee field is mostly used to determine who gets bugmail for a
particular component. Some of the assignments make sense, like having me be the
default for Mac bugs, some not so much, like Chris Shoemaker for budget bugs:
He hasn't been around for a long time.
It also makes it har
26 matches
Mail list logo
