Re: gnucash master: Better test for conflict between optimization and FORTIFY_SOURCE

2014-05-02 Thread John Ralls
On May 2, 2014, at 3:15 PM, Mike Alexander wrote: > --On May 2, 2014 5:02:45 PM -0400 John Ralls wrote: > >> Updated via https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/8cb391b3 >> (commit) from https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/ac9a6ae6 >> (commit) >> >> >> >> commit 8cb391b3

Re: gnucash master: Better test for conflict between optimization and FORTIFY_SOURCE

2014-05-02 Thread Mike Alexander
--On May 2, 2014 5:02:45 PM -0400 John Ralls wrote: Updated via https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/8cb391b3 (commit)from https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/ac9a6ae6 (commit) commit 8cb391b30846f04eb6b874ef6dde723be372b7d0 Author: John Ralls Date: Fri May 2 14:02:

Re: RESULT! (was: Re: Building on Windows from scratch - follow up)

2014-05-02 Thread John Ralls
On May 2, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Geert Janssens wrote: > On Friday 02 May 2014 11:06:14 John Ralls wrote: > > The HH installation check is still failing for me, as is the > > installation. I ran it by hand and got it to install in c:\gcdev, but > > the check fails anyway: > > > I suspect it will fai

Re: gnucash maint: Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE directive only when compiling with optimization enabled

2014-05-02 Thread Mike Alexander
--On May 2, 2014 7:37:52 PM +0200 Geert Janssens wrote: From what I understand gnucash' configure script will strip out any -Ox if --enable-debug is set. Since I have this set I don't have any -Ox in CFLAGS anymore. Almost. Near the top of configure.ac the -O flag in CFLAGS is saved in US

Re: gnucash maint: Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE directive only when compiling with optimization enabled

2014-05-02 Thread John Ralls
On May 2, 2014, at 10:37 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > On Friday 02 May 2014 13:22:38 Mike Alexander wrote: >> On May 2, 2014, at 9:58 AM, Geert Janssens >> wrote: >>> Updated via https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/ca480862 >>> (commit)> >>> from https://github.com/Gnucash/gnu

Re: RESULT! (was: Re: Building on Windows from scratch - follow up)

2014-05-02 Thread Geert Janssens
On Friday 02 May 2014 11:06:14 John Ralls wrote: > The HH installation check is still failing for me, as is the > installation. I ran it by hand and got it to install in c:\gcdev, but > the check fails anyway: > I suspect it will fail because the html help install step runs pexports and dlltool o

Re: RESULT! (was: Re: Building on Windows from scratch - follow up)

2014-05-02 Thread John Ralls
On May 1, 2014, at 10:21 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > On Thursday 01 May 2014 15:55:07 Geert Janssens wrote: >> Thank you for my feedback. It's nice to hear my effort is appreciated. >> > Sometimes I appear to write utter nonsense... Rereading the above I of course > wanted to > say > Thank yo

Re: gnucash maint: Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE directive only when compiling with optimization enabled

2014-05-02 Thread Geert Janssens
On Friday 02 May 2014 13:22:38 Mike Alexander wrote: > On May 2, 2014, at 9:58 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > > Updated via https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/ca480862 > > (commit)> > > from https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/08c59b58 (commit) > > > > commit ca48086287045c0

Re: gnucash maint: Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE directive only when compiling with optimization enabled

2014-05-02 Thread Mike Alexander
On May 2, 2014, at 9:58 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > Updatedvia https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/ca480862 > (commit) > from https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/08c59b58 (commit) > > > > commit ca48086287045c0af08b0dde62ce121e00a8e0c0 > Author: Geert Janssens > Da

Re: gnucash maint: Multiple changes pushed

2014-05-02 Thread Mike Alexander
On May 2, 2014, at 10:01 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > I have pushed a commit that only adds _FORTIFY_SOURCE if compilation with > optimization is detected. > > Feel free to improve it if you have a cleaner solution. > > Geert Thanks for fixing it. Just out of curiosity, what version of gcc ar

Re: gnucash maint: Multiple changes pushed

2014-05-02 Thread Geert Janssens
On Friday 02 May 2014 15:19:06 Geert Janssens wrote: > > This commit breaks the build on my system (ironically a Fedora > system). > > The _FORTIFY_SOURCE addition results in the following compile error: > /usr/include/features.h:327:4: error: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE > requires compiling with op

Re: Compile Error SchedXAction.h

2014-05-02 Thread Herbert Mühlburger
Hi, Am 2014-05-02 15:19, schrieb Colin Law: > On 2 May 2014 13:14, Herbert Mühlburger > wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> The latest commits to HEAD produce a new issue while compiling >> it. This issue I have not encountered before the latest commits >> were pushed to github. >> >> Does anybody have t

Re: Compile Error SchedXAction.h

2014-05-02 Thread Colin Law
On 2 May 2014 13:14, Herbert Mühlburger wrote: > Hi folks, > > The latest commits to HEAD produce a new issue while compiling it. > This issue I have not encountered before the latest commits were > pushed to github. > > Does anybody have the same problem? > .. > Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefun

Re: gnucash maint: Multiple changes pushed

2014-05-02 Thread Geert Janssens
On Sunday 27 April 2014 16:29:11 Mike Alexander wrote: > Updatedvia https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/2c4463e7 > (commit) via https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/4ec1f6b7 > (commit) from https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/fb8018b3 > (commit) (snip) > > commit 4ec1f6

Re: libdbi-0.9.0 vs. libdbi-0.8.4 on Ubuntu 14.04 Issue

2014-05-02 Thread Colin Law
On 2 May 2014 09:21, Geert Janssens wrote: > ... > It would be interesting to test with brancht 'maint' as well. The changes > for libdbi 0.9.0 have been committed after 2.6.3 has been released. > > Also I'm confused here: are both versions (HEAD and 2.6.3) linking against > libdbi 0.9 ? If so doe

Compile Error SchedXAction.h

2014-05-02 Thread Herbert Mühlburger
Hi folks, The latest commits to HEAD produce a new issue while compiling it. This issue I have not encountered before the latest commits were pushed to github. Does anybody have the same problem? test -f 'utest-Invoice.c' || echo './'`utest-Invoice.c mv -f .deps/test_engine-utest-Invoice.Tpo .de

Re: libdbi-0.9.0 vs. libdbi-0.8.4 on Ubuntu 14.04 Issue

2014-05-02 Thread Geert Janssens
On Friday 02 May 2014 08:53:13 Colin Law wrote: > On 2 May 2014 07:49, Herbert Mühlburger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am 2014-05-01 22:46, schrieb Colin Law: > > > > [...] > > > apt-cache policy libdbd-mysql > > > > [...] > > > >> That looks ok, though I meant libdbd-sqlite3 since I see that

Re: libdbi-0.9.0 vs. libdbi-0.8.4 on Ubuntu 14.04 Issue

2014-05-02 Thread Colin Law
On 2 May 2014 07:49, Herbert Mühlburger wrote: > Hi, > > Am 2014-05-01 22:46, schrieb Colin Law: > > [...] > apt-cache policy libdbd-mysql > > [...] > >> That looks ok, though I meant libdbd-sqlite3 since I see that is >> what you are using, I presume that shows the same thing. I am >> using