On 2 May 2014 09:21, Geert Janssens <janssens-ge...@telenet.be> wrote: > ... > It would be interesting to test with brancht 'maint' as well. The changes > for libdbi 0.9.0 have been committed after 2.6.3 has been released. > > Also I'm confused here: are both versions (HEAD and 2.6.3) linking against > libdbi 0.9 ? If so does the 2.6.3 build generate deprecation warnings for > some libdbi functions ?
Compiling 2.6.3 the warnings were libdbi deprecations as you suggested. The warnings are gone in the maint branch., so that makes sense. The maint branch does not run, however, giving a SIGEGV in dbi_initialize_r(). I am confused by the fact that if I compile the 2.6.3 tarball (on the same system) then I do not get the deprecation warnings. > .... > John's recent c++ related commits have caused sufficient difference between > the stable branch (maint and by extension also tag 2.6.3) and HEAD that you > need to start from a completely clean build directory AND have to rerun > autogen.sh in between. So the steps would become: > > > > sudo make uninstall (to remove your installed version of gnucash) > > make maintainer-clean (wipes everything that was generated) > > > > git checkout 2.6.3 (or git checkout maint) > > > > ./autogen.sh > > ./configure ... > > make > > sudo make install > > > > Because I switch a lot between maint and master, I have chosen to clone the > gnucash repository twice. One close is permanently checked out to maint the > other to master. > > > > And in addition I'm building in separate build directories instead of in the > source directories. That makes it easier to start from scratch (just delete > the build directory). This is pretty easy to do: > > create your build directory (wherever you like) > > cd <build-directory> > > <path-to-gnucash-configure>/configure ... > > make Thanks for all that, it all makes sense. Colin _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
