I'm currently using r12184, but this behavior has been fairly
consistent lately:
If the tip-of-the-day is set to display at start-up, the main window
will lose its grip on its remembered size. i.e., with the totd
showing during launch, the main window starts out small and aligned
with the
On Dec 27, 2005, at 3:46 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Package managers are great until you try to work on multiple
projects without knowing what you're doing. Fink takes better
care of dependencies than I do. The .la file was supplied by
guile16-dev
My problems below were fixed by updating a bunch of gnome
dependencies. I suspect glib2 was causing my heartburn, but I wasn't
documenting my changes carefully enough to be sure now.
I still get the stock_lookup critical message plus one warning, but
yelp 2.12.2 now allows me to view gnucas
On Dec 27, 2005, at 12:17 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
compiling 12184, I run into a problem:
[snip]
grep: /sw/lib/libguile-ltdl.la: No such file or directory
/sw/bin/sed: can't read /sw/lib/libguile-ltdl.la: No such file or
directory
libtool: link:
Quoting David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Package managers are great until you try to work on multiple projects
without knowing what you're doing. Fink takes better care of
dependencies than I do. The .la file was supplied by guile16-dev.
Reinstalling solved my immediate problem. Now all I
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 27. Dezember 2005 19:06 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hello again,
>
> Updated Norwegian Bokmaal Translation.
> 1902 out of 3405 Translated.
thanks a lot. Applied to SVN.
(As you might have read, in the future those updates should be sent to
gnucash-devel with [PATCH] in the sub
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'll cope with my personal methods
to keep track of patches between now and when we get something like
the trac tracker up and running. I presume you don't object to requiring
developers (read: committers) to have trac accounts to handle and close ou
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 01:19:29PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:59:00PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >>We've got 26 email addresses subscribed to -patches but not subscribed
> >>to -devel. Of those 26 addresses, 9 of the
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:59:00PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
We've got 26 email addresses subscribed to -patches but not subscribed
to -devel. Of those 26 addresses, 9 of them are linas.org/gnucash.org
addresses of developers. So that means there
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 07:06:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I have found the TourtoiseSVN program for WinXP. Is there someone who has
> tryed to/know that it is possible:
> Use that program, and get the latest trunk to a memorystick, then copy
> that directory on top of t
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:59:00PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> We've got 26 email addresses subscribed to -patches but not subscribed
> to -devel. Of those 26 addresses, 9 of them are linas.org/gnucash.org
> addresses of developers. So that means there are 17 people subscribed
> to -patches that
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 12:42 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Would it be ok for me to s/GTime/time_t/ everywhere and then
> say in some global header, like maybe config.h:
>
> #ifndef HAVE_GLIB29
> #define g_date_set_time_t g_date_set_time
> #endif
>
> and then just convert all uses of g
We've got 26 email addresses subscribed to -patches but not subscribed
to -devel. Of those 26 addresses, 9 of them are linas.org/gnucash.org
addresses of developers. So that means there are 17 people subscribed
to -patches that are not subscribed to -devel.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:11:10PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >>Or they can CC both lists and wait for the list admin to clear the
> >>moderation queue.
> >
> >Oh, if they're only subscribed to -devel, right? That's not so good.
> >They're just a
Quoted for example:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:20:21PM -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> Modified: gnucash/trunk/src/engine/Recurrence.c
> ===
> --- gnucash/trunk/src/engine/Recurrence.c 2005-12-27 15:41:07 UTC (rev
> 12184)
> +++ g
Quoting David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
compiling 12184, I run into a problem:
[snip]
grep: /sw/lib/libguile-ltdl.la: No such file or directory
/sw/bin/sed: can't read /sw/lib/libguile-ltdl.la: No such file or directory
libtool: link: `/sw/lib/libguile-ltdl.la' is not a valid libtool archi
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Or they can CC both lists and wait for the list admin to clear the
moderation queue.
Oh, if they're only subscribed to -devel, right? That's not so good.
They're just as likely to assume their mail was dropped rather than
entered into a moderation
compiling 12184, I run into a problem:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../.. -I../.. -I/sw/
include -I../../lib/glib26 -I /sw/include/g-wrap -I/sw/include/
glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -DORBIT2=1 -I/sw/include/gconf/2 -
I/sw/include/orbit-2.0 -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/l
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:15:44AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> > I don't know if there's a good way to get mailman to do that. I mean,
> >> > I can probably subscribe gnucash-devel to gnucash-patches, but that
> >> > just feels... wrong.
> >>
>
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I don't know if there's a good way to get mailman to do that. I mean,
>> > I can probably subscribe gnucash-devel to gnucash-patches, but that
>> > just feels... wrong.
>>
>> Seems... elegant. :)
>
> Hmm... I thought of an obvious downside to thi
David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trying to compile 12183, I get an error:
>
> gog-radar.c:392: error: static declaration of 'fmin' follows non-
> static declaration
>
> That line appears to have been changed in 12039 for gcc 4
> compatibility. I'm stuck at gcc 3.3 until I can get a gw
Quoting David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
My latest configure run (and maybe all of them before that!) sent me
a warning:
checking for working long double with more range or precision than
double... yes
...
checking for strtold... yes
checking if we must prototype strtold ourselves... yes
My latest configure run (and maybe all of them before that!) sent me
a warning:
checking for working long double with more range or precision than
double... yes
...
checking for strtold... yes
checking if we must prototype strtold ourselves... yes
configure: WARNING: Long double support disa
Trying to compile 12183, I get an error:
gog-radar.c:392: error: static declaration of 'fmin' follows non-
static declaration
That line appears to have been changed in 12039 for gcc 4
compatibility. I'm stuck at gcc 3.3 until I can get a gwrap upgrade.
Mac 10.4.3, gcc 3.3
--
David Reiser
[
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:13:50PM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
>
> No no no no. Please don't mess with the Reply-To field. I already hate it
> from
> the two times when I replied to the -patches list recently, where I really
> only wanted to write to the sender (#1 above). Really don't do
Am Dienstag, 27. Dezember 2005 01:42 schrieb Tim Wunder:
> > PS: in the future, PLEASE REPLY TO THE LIST!
>
> Which begs the question... why not set the reply-to header to be the list?
No no no no no. Please don't let this header munging extend to any mailing
list around here. There are good reas
26 matches
Mail list logo
