On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:11:10PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >>Or they can CC both lists and wait for the list admin to clear the
> >>moderation queue.
> >
> >Oh, if they're only subscribed to -devel, right? That's not so good.
> >They're just as likely to assume their mail was dropped rather than
> >entered into a moderation queue.
>
> They should get an email from mailman telling them their message was
> entered into the moderation queue because they weren't subbed. So,
> they shouldn't assume their mail was dropped. Or at least I don't
> know why they would assume that....
Oh, I see.
> >Ok. Sounds good. As list-admin, you can tell how many people are
> >subscribed to -patches that are not subscribed to -devel. I suspect
> >it's very few. If it's sufficiently few, maybe we can count this
> >thread as accomplishing step 1.
>
> I'm not sure if there's a good way to compare list membership. I suppose
> I could do it by pulling out the membership lists into files and then
> comparing the files... *ponders and easy way to do this*
perhaps something along these lines? :
$ list_members gnucash-{patches,devel | sort > patches
$ list_members gnucash-devel | sort > devel
$ diff -u devel patches | grep ^+ | wc -l
-chris
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
