Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Or they can CC both lists and wait for the list admin to clear the
moderation queue.
Oh, if they're only subscribed to -devel, right? That's not so good.
They're just as likely to assume their mail was dropped rather than
entered into a moderation queue.
They should get an email from mailman telling them their message was
entered into the moderation queue because they weren't subbed. So,
they shouldn't assume their mail was dropped. Or at least I don't
know why they would assume that....
Next year? So Sunday? I can't wait. :-P
:-P
Probably not until Mid January... I dont get home until the 7th or 8th
so probably the weekend after that I can devote to upgrading the gnucash
hardware and software. Note that it means about 24-48 hours of downtime
for SVN, Email, Wiki, etc.
The only reason I was thinking of was that "patches" becomes somewhat
of a misnomer. But, that would only bother me if it were the
long-term solution. I certainly don't mind leaving it as -patches,
until something better comes along.
Agreed. In the long run we should have a -commits list that is read-only
(and only commiters, and perhaps 'trac' post to it).
Ok. Sounds good. As list-admin, you can tell how many people are
subscribed to -patches that are not subscribed to -devel. I suspect
it's very few. If it's sufficiently few, maybe we can count this
thread as accomplishing step 1.
I'm not sure if there's a good way to compare list membership. I suppose
I could do it by pulling out the membership lists into files and then
comparing the files... *ponders and easy way to do this*
-chris
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
