Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While Moneydance seems to be very good software, it is not free in
> either sense of the work. It is a shareware program, at least
> according to its website.
Well, then I guess I won't be working hard for them anytime soon :>
--
Rob Browning <[EMAI
On 14 Dec 1999 09:04:24 +0200, the world broke into rejoicing as
Alexandru Harsanyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm not an accounting expert, but I think the brokerage fee is
> actually an expense and not an asset (If you purchased 100 shares at
> $10, you sill have them but the brokerage fee is
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 23:09:23 EST, the world broke into rejoicing as
Per Bojsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> *** Regarding Re: Plans for 1.3/1.4 (or should it be 1.3/2.0?); Derek
> Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adds:
>
> Derek> Actually, the one other feature I think many people want (at
> Derek>
> On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 15:34:44 -0700, Jeremy Collins
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Jeremy> Rob Walker wrote:
>>
>>
>> okay, you options junkies, open up gnucash, highlight options,
>> preferences, and then hit Ctrl-T.
>>
>> Oops! now you don't have a hotkey for _A_ccounts, _T_ransfer.
*** Regarding Re: Plans for 1.3/1.4 (or should it be 1.3/2.0?); Derek
Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adds:
Derek> Actually, the one other feature I think many people want (at
Derek> least users who are used to Quicken), is the ability to
Derek> re-parent an account.
I wrote a little perl script
> Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Next week we expect (...hope...) to run a fairly big feature. A new loo
> k
> > > at gnucash could come in the week after. Maybe as part of a joint revie
> w
> > > with moneydance - I'm not sure how you feel about that...
> >
> > No
Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Next week we expect (...hope...) to run a fairly big feature. A new look
> > at gnucash could come in the week after. Maybe as part of a joint review
> > with moneydance - I'm not sure how you feel about that...
>
> No problem, as far as
Jonathan Corbet writes:
> > We would very much like the opportunity to show you the new code
> > to demonstrate to you and your readers that we are making real
> > progress. Would it be at all possible to hold your review over (from
> > the main weekly bulletin) until then?
>
> The rev
Rob Walker wrote:
>
>
> okay, you options junkies, open up gnucash, highlight options,
> preferences, and then hit Ctrl-T.
>
> Oops! now you don't have a hotkey for _A_ccounts, _T_ransfer.
> Interesting.
>
Of course... you cannot have the say hotkey attached to two different
items. So n
> On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 13:31:53 -0800, Dave Peticolas
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> New thing #2: I'm not sure how many people are aware of this,
Dave> but gnome apps let you define your own hotkeys on the fly. I
Dave> just discovered this a few days ago. Pull down a menu and
Dave> h
Thank you for your review of Gnucash. As one of the people currently
hacking on Gnucash, it is gratifying to see the work that's been put
in get some attention.
A quick point - the problem with the reporting code is a trivial one -
a patch has already been developed and will make it into 1.2.6,
In one message or another, Dave Peticolas said something like this:
>New thing #2: I'm not sure how many people are aware of this,
>but gnome apps let you define your own hotkeys on the fly.
I did know that.. I discovered it on gimp, and yep, it kick total
ass..
-e
--
Ed Porras [EMAIL PROT
Dave Peticolas wrote:
>
> New thing #2: I'm not sure how many people are aware of this,
> but gnome apps let you define your own hotkeys on the fly.
> I just discovered this a few days ago. Pull down a menu and
> highlite a choice, but don't select it. Now hit a key combination
> like 'Ctrl+Y', an
> In one message or another, Dave Peticolas said something like this:
> >Those entries allow you to 'tear-off' the menu and place it on your
> >desktop. They are part of standard Gnome, so I'd be hesistant about
> >removing them.
>
> now you see, you learn something new everyday.. :)
New thing #
In one message or another, Dave Peticolas said something like this:
>Those entries allow you to 'tear-off' the menu and place it on your
>desktop. They are part of standard Gnome, so I'd be hesistant about
>removing them.
now you see, you learn something new everyday.. :)
-e
--
Ed Porras [
> In one message or another, Dave Peticolas said something like this:
> >Here is my latest patch. It contains the following.
> >
> >Bug tracker bugs fixed: 24, 26, 32, 36, 38 (sort of)
>
> a couple of minor things:
>
> 2. on the main window menus, are the dashed-lined entries necessary?
> I've s
> Jeremy Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am having the same problems. This is definitely something that
> > needs to find its way into the next release.
>
> Ugh. This was at the top of my gnucash todo list, and then I forgot
> about it :<
>
> I've talked with Linas about how to do
> Does anybody want to contact LWN about it? I'd like to get
> them to at least see our current code, mainly to demonstrate
> to the wider world that we ARE making real progress.
>
> I don't mind writing the email, but I'd like the list's OK before
> I do anything.
Fine by me!
dave
--
Gnucas
Does anybody want to contact LWN about it? I'd like to get
them to at least see our current code, mainly to demonstrate
to the wider world that we ARE making real progress.
I don't mind writing the email, but I'd like the list's OK before
I do anything.
--
Rob Browning writes:
> Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I would think it a *very* good idea to try to arrange for there to
> > be two or three "trusted lieutenants" that could also submit patches
> > into the "official tree." That should *definitely* include Dave;
> > R
Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would think it a *very* good idea to try to arrange for there to
> be two or three "trusted lieutenants" that could also submit patches
> into the "official tree." That should *definitely* include Dave;
> Rob Browning would probably be the secon
Jeremy Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am having the same problems. This is definitely something that
> needs to find its way into the next release.
Ugh. This was at the top of my gnucash todo list, and then I forgot
about it :<
I've talked with Linas about how to do this, and the tri
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:36:51 PST, the world broke into rejoicing as
Rob Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 23:14:42 +1100 (EST), Robert Graham Merkel
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>
>
> Robert> Obviously, bug fixes and wart removals must also happen before
>
> On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 23:14:42 +1100 (EST), Robert Graham Merkel
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Robert> Obviously, bug fixes and wart removals must also happen before
Robert> a release.
I disagree here. I would like to have way way more releases, so that
we can have more people working
It's been rumoured that Robert Graham Merkel said:
>
> I'd just like to get a view from everyone, particularly Linas,
> (whoops, almost typed Linus), on some definitive goals and a schedule
> for a 1.3/1.4 release.
I'm planning on taking two weeks off from work starting next week,
and this shou
Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 1) The improved reporting system previously discussed.
> >I haven't done any work on this, as yet, but I will
> >start work on it before the week is out, all being well.
> >This is by far t
Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) The improved reporting system previously discussed.
>I haven't done any work on this, as yet, but I will
>start work on it before the week is out, all being well.
>This is by far the biggest thing I'd like sorted o
Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A thought: It would surely be desirable to have some sort of
> common indentation policy applied to the C code; this could be
> applied by setting up an "indent" command with the preferred
> indentation policy in the Makefile. The *critical* step
Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) The improved reporting system previously discussed.
>I haven't done any work on this, as yet, but I will
>start work on it before the week is out, all being well.
>This is by far the biggest thing I'd like sorted o
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 00:32:51 PST, the world broke into rejoicing as
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Thanks for the patch, Rob. I'm stripping out all the emacs mode
> comments from your diffs. I realize there are some in existing
> files, but we're trying to move away from using them, a
I'd just like to get a view from everyone, particularly Linas,
(whoops, almost typed Linus), on some definitive goals and a schedule
for a 1.3/1.4 release.
It seems pretty clear that the gnome code is more featureful than
the motif code, and avoids the version number minefield of
of lesstif. Ty
Herbert Thoma wrote:
>
> Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> >
> > Here's the review:
> >
> > http://lwn.net/1999/features/GnuCash/
> >
> > Their basic conclusion is:
> >
> > promising, but not quite there.
> >
> > However, I don't know about you, but I think CVS (particularly with
> > the bigpatch) ha
Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
>
> Here's the review:
>
> http://lwn.net/1999/features/GnuCash/
>
> Their basic conclusion is:
>
> promising, but not quite there.
>
> However, I don't know about you, but I think CVS (particularly with
> the bigpatch) has progressed quite a ways from 1.2.5.
I ag
http://linuxtoday.com/story.php3?sn=13778
Get ready for an influx of bug reports . . .
--
---
Robert Merkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Humanity has advanced, when it has advanced, not
Here's the review:
http://lwn.net/1999/features/GnuCash/
Their basic conclusion is:
promising, but not quite there.
However, I don't know about you, but I think CVS (particularly with
the bigpatch) has progressed quite a ways from 1.2.5.
Did anyone discuss this with the LWN people?
LWN comes
I'm not sure whether I did this, or someone else did, but someone ran
automake on the sources, and I think didn't use the same arguments
that the upstream author uses. I'm not familiar enough with automake
to know if this is a bug, but our g-wrap differs from the upstream
substantially, even ign
36 matches
Mail list logo
