> Can you provide some examples of GNOME projects doing so? I think this
> are good candidates for getting additional bug reports :)
Well. If I just gtgrep for danish in msgids in all po-files in
gnome-2-30 and gnome-extras I get the result below. Please note that
there could be false positives in
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 14:20 +0100, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
> 2010/2/21 Nils-Christoph Fiedler :
...
>
> Other things that could easily be made more economic, and in priciple
> should be, does not work so well. E.g. language, country and currency
> names should in priciple be a part of an ISO file
2010/2/21 Nils-Christoph Fiedler :
> yes, i understand - modularity has some great advantages for the user.
> and one big file has just advantages for the translator.. :-)
> but i guess i'll try that catalog thing, mentioned by mario.
> thanks!
BTW. Some things are already made more "economic". E.
yes, i understand - modularity has some great advantages for the user.
and one big file has just advantages for the translator.. :-)
but i guess i'll try that catalog thing, mentioned by mario.
thanks!
nils
---
Am Sonntag, den 21.02.2010, 20:03 +0100 schrieb Andre Klapper:
> Ahoj,
>
> Am Sonnt
Ahoj,
Am Sonntag, den 21.02.2010, 17:56 +0100 schrieb Nils-Christoph Fiedler:
> i have a little question about economy in translating software.
> busy as a bee, we're translating every single line / string of software.
> but isn't there a possibility, technically, to just write a big library
> or
Am Sonntag, den 21.02.2010, 17:56 +0100 schrieb Nils-Christoph Fiedler:
> hej folks,
>
> i have a little question about economy in translating software.
> busy as a bee, we're translating every single line / string of software.
> but isn't there a possibility, technically, to just write a big lib
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 18:20 +, Stephen Brown wrote:
> On 21 February 2010 16:56, Nils-Christoph Fiedler
> wrote:
> > hej folks,
> >
> > i have a little question about economy in translating software.
> > busy as a bee, we're translating every single line / string of software.
> > but isn't the
On 21 February 2010 16:56, Nils-Christoph Fiedler
wrote:
> hej folks,
>
> i have a little question about economy in translating software.
> busy as a bee, we're translating every single line / string of software.
> but isn't there a possibility, technically, to just write a big library
> or a "sup
hej folks,
i have a little question about economy in translating software.
busy as a bee, we're translating every single line / string of software.
but isn't there a possibility, technically, to just write a big library
or a "super-giga-master.po"-file, which includes all of the strings,
instead o
