Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-11 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
2010/10/11 Christian Rose : > 2010/10/11 Ask Hjorth Larsen : >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Kenneth Nielsen >> wrote: > [...] >>> I agree. From the point of a translation coordinator. The best choise >>> is to have all translations in one place that he/she controls. >>> Alternatively, when

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-11 Thread Christian Rose
2010/10/11 Ask Hjorth Larsen : > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Kenneth Nielsen > wrote: [...] >> I agree. From the point of a translation coordinator. The best choise >> is to have all translations in one place that he/she controls. >> Alternatively, when that fails the second best options is

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-11 Thread Ask Hjorth Larsen
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Kenneth Nielsen wrote: > 2010/10/10 Petr Kovar : >> Hi! >> >> Matthias Clasen , Thu, 7 Oct 2010 07:55:42 -0400: >> >>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Vincent Untz wrote: >>> >>> > I think the right solution is to improve l10n.gnome.org so that it can >>> > inter

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-11 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
2010/10/10 Petr Kovar : > Hi! > > Matthias Clasen , Thu, 7 Oct 2010 07:55:42 -0400: > >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Vincent Untz wrote: >> >> > I think the right solution is to improve l10n.gnome.org so that it can >> > interacts with other platforms (like transifex) where there is a team >>

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-09 Thread Petr Kovar
Hi! Matthias Clasen , Thu, 7 Oct 2010 07:55:42 -0400: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Vincent Untz wrote: > > > I think the right solution is to improve l10n.gnome.org so that it can > > interacts with other platforms (like transifex) where there is a team > > control. > > > > Alternatively w

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-07 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Vincent Untz wrote: > I think the right solution is to improve l10n.gnome.org so that it can > interacts with other platforms (like transifex) where there is a team > control. > > Alternatively we can also investigate something similar to where > transifex is headi

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-07 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 05 octobre 2010, à 18:41 +0200, Johannes Schmid a écrit : > Hi! > > > I'm pretty sure the GNOME infrastructure could do the same thing: get > > the POT file from git.clutter-project.org (it's generated by gettext and > > stored in the repository anyway); send me an email with the PO file

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-07 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 22:47 +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: > Le mardi 05 octobre 2010 à 18:41 +0200, Johannes Schmid a écrit : > > Hi! > > > > > I'm pretty sure the GNOME infrastructure could do the same thing: get > > > the POT file from git.clutter-project.org (it's generated by gettext and > > > st

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-05 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mardi 05 octobre 2010 à 18:41 +0200, Johannes Schmid a écrit : > Hi! > > > I'm pretty sure the GNOME infrastructure could do the same thing: get > > the POT file from git.clutter-project.org (it's generated by gettext and > > stored in the repository anyway); send me an email with the PO file o

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-05 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! > I'm pretty sure the GNOME infrastructure could do the same thing: get > the POT file from git.clutter-project.org (it's generated by gettext and > stored in the repository anyway); send me an email with the PO file once > the coordinator has reviewed the contribution. I could even allow comm

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-05 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 10:25 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote: > >> > I want to raise the point again, that the separate git server is > >> painful > >> > for translators which is the main reason that I dislike it. (see > >> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2010-July/msg00075.html and > >>

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-05 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! > Kenneth Nielsen , Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:45:02 +0200: > >> 2010/10/4 Johannes Schmid : >> > Hi! >> > >> >> Clutter is still hosted on a separate server because the Clutter >> >> Project wants to be an umbrella for a set of projects, like language >> >> bindings, toolkits, and applications that m

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-04 Thread Petr Kovar
Hi! Kenneth Nielsen , Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:45:02 +0200: > 2010/10/4 Johannes Schmid : > > Hi! > > > >> Clutter is still hosted on a separate server because the Clutter > >> Project wants to be an umbrella for a set of projects, like language > >> bindings, toolkits, and applications that may or may

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-04 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
2010/10/4 Johannes Schmid : > Hi! > >> Clutter is still hosted on a separate server because the Clutter Project >> wants to be an umbrella for a set of projects, like language bindings, >> toolkits, and applications that may or may not be related to the GNOME >> Project. we're fairly liberal with g