On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:42 -0400, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
> Hey Bryen.
>
> > I honestly think that even if it hasn't been perfect, the hour we've had
> > lately is working pretty well for us this year.
>
> Well Maybe
>
Actually my "semi-endorsement" of the current meeting time is based
Hey Bryen.
> I honestly think that even if it hasn't been perfect, the hour we've had
> lately is working pretty well for us this year.
Well Maybe
I cannot help but wonder if those for whom it does not work well are
simply too polite to complain.
For instance, I believe that the curren
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:00 -0400, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 01:34 +0200, Piñeiro wrote:
>
> > Ups, I also forgot that, due Easter holidays. There was any meeting
> > today?
>
> Heh. I'd forgotten about the Easter holidays. :-) And, no, there was no
> meeting today.
>
> > IM
On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 01:34 +0200, Piñeiro wrote:
> Ups, I also forgot that, due Easter holidays. There was any meeting
> today?
Heh. I'd forgotten about the Easter holidays. :-) And, no, there was no
meeting today.
> IMHO, it would be a good idea to keep that meetings. Not sure if we
> would ha
From: Joanmarie Diggs
> My apologies for being my absent-minded self. But, did we ever decide
> what to do about the weekly meetings we were having in #a11y?
>
> Thanks! Take care.
Ups, I also forgot that, due Easter holidays. There was any meeting
today?
IMHO, it would be a good idea to keep
Hey guys.
My apologies for being my absent-minded self. But, did we ever decide
what to do about the weekly meetings we were having in #a11y?
Thanks! Take care.
--joanie
___
gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org
http: