On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 01:34 +0200, Piñeiro wrote: > Ups, I also forgot that, due Easter holidays. There was any meeting > today?
Heh. I'd forgotten about the Easter holidays. :-) And, no, there was no meeting today. > IMHO, it would be a good idea to keep that meetings. Not sure if we > would have enough things to say, but no problem to have less than a > hour meetings just to keep updated. > > Other issue is about the day and time. AFAIR, the current hour is not > really very popular, due some problems on the poll. That was the other thing I was wondering about. I don't think we'll be able to find a single hour that will work for everyone. And having a different hour each week strikes me as a likely source of confusion. But, assuming the consensus is to continue having weekly meetings, would it be possible to come up with a couple of times, at least one of which works for each individual? If so, we could alternate between them and the time would only suck, at most, every other week. :-) --joanie _______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-list mailing list gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
