same but for X=8,9 SSE is an order of magnitude better than AVX. For a more
normal value like X=5,6 the acceleration types certainly agree so this
might not be very important but I wanted to post what I have seen
nonetheless.
Best,
Ali Sinan Saglam
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Mark Abraham
Hi Mark,
Thank you for the suggestion, that's what I needed to know!
Best,
Ali Sinan Saglam
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
> >From memory, the Bussi thermostat does take its seed from ld-seed. You
> can see this yourself by observing that mdrun -reprod wi
sults)
Also all builds passed regression tests.
I just wondered if this is a known problem or are we making a mistake while
compiling?
Best,
Ali Sinan Saglam
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
tested but had similar
results (his system heated to 400+K) and we didn't share any input files.
All conserved energy fine with SSE instruction set (my results were losing
energy with 1.1kcal/mol.ps)
Best,
Ali Sinan Saglam
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
> With what
nline/mdp_opt.html#run)
Best,
Ali Sinan Saglam
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests t
5 matches
Mail list logo