Justin,
Regarding the charges you mention, what do you think about RESP charges for
this kind of compounds (drugs) parameterization?
Best wishes
Esteban
--
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
> Just the $0.02 that I always seem to contribute in these types of
> discuss
Dear All
I want to simulate a protein in Electric Field how can I do that? where
should I start from!
It's very Important for me! Please help me!
Thanks
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http:
Hi Solomon,
> [100%] Building C object src/kernel/CMakeFiles/mdrun.dir/md_openmm.c.o
> Linking CXX executable mdrun-gpu
> ld: warning: in /usr/local/openmm/lib/libOpenMM.dylib, file was built for
> i386 which is not the architecture being linked (x86_64)
The above linker message clearly states wh
Samrat Pal wrote:
Hi All,
In general what we do in pulling simulations that we pull one
selection keeping the other fixed. In that case the distance between the
two selections increases with time. Now, I want to push the selections
i.e. one selection will be kept fixed and the oth
Mark Abraham wrote:
On 16/11/2010 7:14 AM, nishap.pa...@utoronto.ca wrote:
Hello,
I want to turn off electrostatic interactions between CH4 and SOL
in my system. I am using ffG53a6 forcefield for CH4 and spc for my
water model. CH4 is an united atom and so I can't make the charges
zero
Just the $0.02 that I always seem to contribute in these types of discussions -
the topology you have shown below contains some likely problems. The charges
(and massive charge group size) can lead to artifacts. We've got a paper due
out soon about the implications of incorrect charges, but
Hi All,
In general what we do in pulling simulations that we pull one
selection keeping the other fixed. In that case the distance between the two
selections increases with time. Now, I want to push the selections i.e. one
selection will be kept fixed and the other will be pushed towa
Thank you very much for writing! I have tried what was suggested, and the
following errors were produced follow the use of the make mdrun command:
[100%] Building C object src/kernel/CMakeFiles/mdrun.dir/md_openmm.c.o
Linking CXX executable mdrun-gpu
ld: warning: in /usr/local/openmm/lib/libOpen
On 16/11/2010 2:30 AM, Paolo Conflitti wrote:
Dear gmx-users,
I'm trying to extract a protein plus a shell of water of a given
radius from the .xtc and .gro files obtained from a simulation step.
My purpose is to make a second box, smaller then the first, with the
protein and the shell of so
On 16/11/2010 6:22 AM, Vitaly Chaban wrote:
Olga -
What is gromos43a1.ff? I do not remember the files with ff-extension
in gromacs. I am sure you should include the topology files in the
There's a new force field organization in 4.5.x. PRODRG still presumes
the previous organization, which le
On 16/11/2010 7:14 AM, nishap.pa...@utoronto.ca wrote:
Hello,
I want to turn off electrostatic interactions between CH4 and SOL
in my system. I am using ffG53a6 forcefield for CH4 and spc for my
water model. CH4 is an united atom and so I can't make the charges
zero in the topology. Is the
Dear Yuvraj:
There is a protocol to find the charges and force field parameters for
new molecules for the AMBER force field. The best way is to try to
find the parameters from a publication. If you dont find anything then
use RED to find the charges (http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/RED/).
Then use
Hi,
Did you run CMake in a fresh directory? If not try
$ rm CMakeCache.txt
$ cmake -DGMX_OPENMM=ON
$ make mdrun
Cheers,
Rossen
On 11/14/10 5:58 PM, Solomon Berman wrote:
Good day friends,
I am trying to install mdrun-gpu on my MacBook Pro, using Mac OS X Snow Leopard
v. 10.6.5.
I typed the
Hi, All.
I have a non-standard force-field defined in TINKER, but I'd like to use it in
GROMACS. The TINKER documentation doesn't do a good job of describing how they
define their torsion functions. Does anybody on this list know how TINKER's
torsion potentials are defined and possibly how to c
Hello,
I want to turn off electrostatic interactions between CH4 and SOL
in my system. I am using ffG53a6 forcefield for CH4 and spc for my
water model. CH4 is an united atom and so I can't make the charges
zero in the topology. Is there any other way I can turn off
electrostatic inter
How to parametrize N-acetyl Glucosamine present in my PDB file with AMBER
force field to use in GROMACS.
Please suggest some solutions.
Thanks
--
Yuvraj
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://ww
Hi,
this is a bug in the autoconf version GROMACS is using. Since we are moving
to cmake we are not updating it thus this is an issue which won't be fixed.
There are two options:
- Create a folder. Copy (or symlink) the static library into that folder.
Point the linker (-L) to that folder. Becaus
Olga -
What is gromos43a1.ff? I do not remember the files with ff-extension
in gromacs. I am sure you should include the topology files in the
inverse order as compared to what is below:
1) general FF with atoms, bonds, angles, etc (~ include "gromos43a1.ff");
2) molecule definition, its own atoms
Hey, Miguel -
Hmm... I think, frozen particles will give unnatural pressure of your
system, that's why barostats do not do their jobs as expected. Maybe
it could be interesting to rescale the coordinates of the frozen atoms
with the box vectors (with certain corrections in pressure
calculation)...
Hey Vitaly,
Thank you for your reply. Here is the files:
*itp:*
;
;
; This file was generated by PRODRG version AA081006.0504
; PRODRG written/copyrighted by Daan van Aalten
; and Alexander Schuettelkopf
;
; Questions/comments to d...@davapc1.bioch.dundee.ac.uk
;
; W
Hey, Olga -
> Also please can you tell me where can I get "ffgmx.itp" file?
/$gromacs_folder/share/gromacs/top/ffgmx.itp as well as all other
standard topology files are there.
By trying to run md I am getting an error: Fatal error:
> moleculetype UNK is redefined
Please post you top and itp fi
Dear gmx-users,
I'm trying to extract a protein plus a shell of water of a given
radius from the .xtc and .gro files obtained from a simulation step. My
purpose is to make a second box, smaller then the first, with the
protein and the shell of solvent in order to optimize the performance of
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to look at the radial distribution function of water around the
surface of my protein. For that, I calculated the surface area per residue
(g_sas -or).
Since I didn't find in the litterature any criteria to choose a minimum area
value to count a residue as a a surface resid
Dear Mark, users and developers...
Indeed, the source of the problems comes from both the constraints and
the pressure bath. The temperature bath did not seem to interfere.
Now, the problem is clear, to remove constraints is not only compulsory
but also recommendable for such simulations.
Gloria Saracino wrote:
Hi everybody,
I would like to submit a biotinilated peptide to MD with 53a6 force field. Do
you know where I can look for the topology and parameters file?
I would start with a literature search, then the Users' Contribution section of
the Gromacs site, then perhaps
Hi everybody,
I would like to submit a biotinilated peptide to MD with 53a6 force field. Do
you know where I can look for the topology and parameters file?
thank you in advance
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search
Hi,
I want to build an all static library because a job running on
background nodes may not be able to find the dynamic libraries installed
on the front node in my system.
My configure line for GCC is:
./configure --prefix=/path-to/gromacs_4.5.3 --enable-mpi --enable-double
CC=cc CFLAGS=-O3
On 15/11/2010 8:45 PM, Olga Ivchenko wrote:
Dear All,
I still have troubles of starting running md for creatine. For which I
created topology using PRODRG programm.
The only difference between creatine.top and creating.itp is that
creatine top has additional lines:
#include "ffgmx.itp"
#incl
Dear All,
I still have troubles of starting running md for creatine. For which I
created topology using PRODRG programm.
The only difference between creatine.top and creating.itp is that creatine
top has additional lines:
#include "ffgmx.itp"
#include "creatine.itp"
Also please can you tell me w
29 matches
Mail list logo