Re: [gmx-users] Re: angle restraints

2006-05-16 Thread Maarten Wolf
David, > > I do not understand this. > > Turning the restraints off is only affecting the highed of dG/dl > and > > turning it off means that you slowly go to zero. > > If you were computing a free energy of removing restraints, > dG/dlambda > should be negative, since it releases energy to tur

[gmx-users] Benchs on gcc and pgi

2006-05-16 Thread Jones de Andrade
Hi all! Well, first of all, sorry if it's on the wrong gromacs list, but from what I could see on the website I could not find a clear indication on where to put benchmarks. Anyway, some time ago I asked the list for help on making this benchmarks, on which I want to compare different com

Re: [Bulk] [gmx-users] Archiving all the simulation data

2006-05-16 Thread Yang Ye
We recently go into some acquisition of cheap SATA-based online storage. It is still preferable to have online storage rather than DVD or tape. And price-wise, it is cheap now to have TB-level storage. Regards, Yang Ye Dallas B. Warren wrote: Not exactly specific GROMACS question, but looking

Re: [gmx-users] microcanonical

2006-05-16 Thread Mark Abraham
karamyog singh wrote: dear gromaxers.. how do i simulate a system under constant energy mode. Don't perturb the energy that is, don't use temperature or pressure regulation and use rigorous bond constraint algorithms. Be aware that use of cut-offs is inherently non-conservative of energy.

Re: [gmx-users] Archiving all the simulation data

2006-05-16 Thread Mark Abraham
Dallas B. Warren wrote: Not exactly specific GROMACS question, but looking for some insight for those who are sure to be encountering the same issues. How are people now handling archiving the huge data files that are produced when going to large simulation boxes for long periods of time? Until

Re: [gmx-users] parallel run hangs (not crashed)

2006-05-16 Thread Mark Abraham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running a system of 185K atoms. The structure is energy minimized and the dynamics run appears to be going smoothly until it just hangs. The job still exists on the first node, but none of the 4 nodes are doing any work and I don't get any error messages. GROMPP:

[gmx-users] Archiving all the simulation data

2006-05-16 Thread chris . neale
We have modified an internal hard drive casing to convert the regular cable into a usb2 so that a cheap internal HD is functionally an external swappable drive. A google search on "convert internal hard drive external" (without the quotes) will bring you to some DIY sites. At regular intervals

[gmx-users] Archiving all the simulation data

2006-05-16 Thread Dallas B. Warren
Not exactly specific GROMACS question, but looking for some insight for those who are sure to be encountering the same issues. How are people now handling archiving the huge data files that are produced when going to large simulation boxes for long periods of time? Until recently it has been find

Re: [gmx-users] Re: parallel run hangs (not crashed)

2006-05-16 Thread David van der Spoel
Jason O'Young wrote: I have been having similar problems to this. I have posted to the mailing list with the title "mdrun_mpi stops at random" but no one has seen my reply :(. it's been quite hectic on the list lately... as always if you have a reproducible problem of a crash after a short

[gmx-users] Re: parallel run hangs (not crashed)

2006-05-16 Thread Jason O'Young
I have been having similar problems to this. I have posted to the mailing list with the title "mdrun_mpi stops at random" but no one has seen my reply :(. It seems to be almost at random which of the processes falls... Jason I am running a system of 185K atoms. The structure is energy min

Re: [gmx-users] parallel run hangs (not crashed)

2006-05-16 Thread David van der Spoel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you sure you want comm_mode = angular ? It seems like you have a periodic system. I do have PBC and a quick search indicates that angular is possible with PBC but can lead to lincs errors or overlaps when using explicit solvent (although I can't find any reasoning.

[gmx-users] Energy Group Exclusions

2006-05-16 Thread Bob Johnson
Hello everyone, I'm simulating a nanotube on a substrate. My substrate is just a simple impenetrable wall of closely packed atoms. To restrict the substrate to a planar geometry I am using position restraints on substrate atoms as well as using energy group exclusions (energygrp_exl = substrate sub

[gmx-users] parallel run hangs (not crashed)

2006-05-16 Thread chris . neale
>Are you sure you want comm_mode = angular ? It seems like you have a >periodic system. I do have PBC and a quick search indicates that angular is possible with PBC but can lead to lincs errors or overlaps when using explicit solvent (although I can't find any reasoning. Anyone know of a referenc

Re: [gmx-users] parallel run hangs (not crashed)

2006-05-16 Thread David van der Spoel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running a system of 185K atoms. The structure is energy minimized and the dynamics run appears to be going smoothly until it just hangs. The job still exists on the first node, but none of the 4 nodes are doing any work and I don't get any error messages. The trajec

[gmx-users] parallel run hangs (not crashed)

2006-05-16 Thread chris . neale
I am running a system of 185K atoms. The structure is energy minimized and the dynamics run appears to be going smoothly until it just hangs. The job still exists on the first node, but none of the 4 nodes are doing any work and I don't get any error messages. The trajectory looks good and no step

Re: [gmx-users] Hessian matrix conversion

2006-05-16 Thread David van der Spoel
Lei Zhou wrote: Hi, Thank you for the answers. So I should use vacuum force field for the all-atom NM analysis. But if I want to add a layer of explicit water molecules as some papers did, which force field should I use? Depends on how much water :) Maybe read those papers a bit more carefu

Re: [gmx-users] Hessian matrix conversion

2006-05-16 Thread Lei Zhou
Hi, Thank you for the answers. So I should use vacuum force field for the all-atom NM analysis. But if I want to add a layer of explicit water molecules as some papers did, which force field should I use? Thanks you. Lei Zhou On 5/16/06, David van der Spoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Lei Zhou

[gmx-users] AFM pulling

2006-05-16 Thread Ariel Alvarez
Hi, I'm getting started with GMX and want to use AFM pulling, but I can't download the file pull.ppa from the website. How can I solve this problem?   Thanks a lot. Ariel Alvarez Yahoo! Autos. Más de 3.000 vehículos vendidos por mes. ¿Qué esperás para vender el tuyo? Hacelo ahora y ganate

Re: [gmx-users] 2 beginner?s questions

2006-05-16 Thread Maxim Fedorov
Message: 6 Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 23:02:15 +1000 From: Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] 2 beginner?s questions To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sampo Karkola wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: [gmx-users] TI and heavy H

2006-05-16 Thread David Mobley
Luther, I actually thought I would switch off an atom`s charge and LJ interactions if I transform it into a dummy atom. Is this wrong? I am worried about the mass of the atom a heavy hydrogen is attached to. In an amino group with heavy hydrogens the mass of the nitrogen is decreased to about 8u

Re: [gmx-users] Hessian matrix conversion

2006-05-16 Thread David van der Spoel
Lei Zhou wrote: Hi, Actually the major purpose was to extract the C-alpha components from all-atom analysis, and then compare the result with other approaches, like the PCA analysis or the GNM you mentioned. There was some discussion on this before. I guess an easy way is still to use g_nme

[gmx-users] microcanonical

2006-05-16 Thread karamyog singh
dear gromaxers.. how do i simulate a system under constant energy mode. thanking you guys in advance. - karamyog. ___ gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please don't post (un)subscribe reques

Re: [gmx-users] Hessian matrix conversion

2006-05-16 Thread Lei Zhou
Hi,   Actually the major purpose was to extract the C-alpha components from all-atom analysis, and then compare the result with other approaches, like the PCA analysis or the GNM you mentioned. There was some discussion on this before. I guess an easy way is still to use g_nmens to generate an ense

Re: [gmx-users] TI and heavy H

2006-05-16 Thread Mark Abraham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Lars, I actually thought I would switch off an atom`s charge and LJ interactions if I transform it into a dummy atom. Is this wrong? I am worried about the mass of the atom a heavy hydrogen is attached to. In an amino group with heavy hydrogens the mass of the nitroge

[gmx-users] TI and heavy H

2006-05-16 Thread reich
Hi Lars, I actually thought I would switch off an atom`s charge and LJ interactions if I transform it into a dummy atom. Is this wrong? I am worried about the mass of the atom a heavy hydrogen is attached to. In an amino group with heavy hydrogens the mass of the nitrogen is decreased to about 8u

Re: [gmx-users] 2 beginner´s questions

2006-05-16 Thread Sampo Karkola
Oops, my bad. Sampo Check out these cool words by Mark Abraham: Sampo Karkola wrote: Hi, also VMD is quite handy. You'll need pdb's for VMD, too. Not true. VMD eats at least .gro, .g96, .trr and .xtc as well as .pdb and a whole pile of others. Mark ___

Re: [gmx-users] 2 beginner´s questions

2006-05-16 Thread Mark Abraham
Sampo Karkola wrote: Hi, also VMD is quite handy. You'll need pdb's for VMD, too. Not true. VMD eats at least .gro, .g96, .trr and .xtc as well as .pdb and a whole pile of others. Mark ___ gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://www

Re: [gmx-users] can we calculate chemical shifts

2006-05-16 Thread Patrick Fuchs
You may also try SHIFTCALC : http://www.shef.ac.uk/NMR/mainframepage.html Patrick David van der Spoel a écrit : Richa taimni wrote: Dear all, my question is that is it possible to calculate chemical shift with the help of gromacs software. You want to get the latest software from the David

Re: [gmx-users] 2 beginner´s questions

2006-05-16 Thread Miguel Ortiz Lombardia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I like a lot "chimera" (http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/) It doesn't currently support gromacs trajectories, but it does support trajectories exported to single or multiple pdb files. It's incredibly easy to learn and use. You can depict your mole

Re: [gmx-users] can we calculate chemical shifts

2006-05-16 Thread David van der Spoel
Richa taimni wrote: Dear all, my question is that is it possible to calculate chemical shift with the help of gromacs software. You want to get the latest software from the David Case group at Scripps for that. Regards, Richa __ Do You Yahoo!?

Re: [gmx-users] 2 beginner´s questions

2006-05-16 Thread Sampo Karkola
Hi, also VMD is quite handy. You'll need pdb's for VMD, too. Check out these cool words by Gale, Ella: You can also use pymol. To use it you have to convert your trajectory to a .pdb using trjconv, but pymol is quite easy to use. > I am just starting my first dynamics and wonder if you could

[gmx-users] can we calculate chemical shifts

2006-05-16 Thread Richa taimni
Dear all, my question is that is it possible to calculate chemical shift with the help of gromacs software. Regards, Richa __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with g_energy in Gromacs 3.3!

2006-05-16 Thread Paul van Maaren
+++ Hu Zhongqiao [Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:06:42PM +0800]: > > I tried to input "Potential" but failed to get results. > Try again and hit the enter key twice. Works for me... Maybe this should be added to the analysis FAQ? -- Groeten, Paul ___ g

[gmx-users] Problem with g_energy in Gromacs 3.3!

2006-05-16 Thread Hu Zhongqiao
Dear all, I tried to use g_energy to calculate potential energy in Gromacs 3.3. But I don't know how to select after something was displayed as follows:     Select the terms you want from the following list-G96Bond G96An

RE: [gmx-users] 2 beginner´s questions

2006-05-16 Thread Gale, Ella
Title: RE: [gmx-users] 2 beginner´s questions You can also use pymol. To use it you have to convert your trajectory to a .pdb using trjconv, but pymol is quite easy to use. > I am just starting my first dynamics and wonder if you could help me with: > 1. Want to use some graphical program t

Re: [gmx-users] TI and heavy H

2006-05-16 Thread Lars Schaefer
Hi Luther, why do you want to switch the charges of your heavy H's off? You could just switch the charges and LJ interactions off, and leave the masses as they are. Best, Lars [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Gromacs users, I want to perform a thermodynamic integration using heavy H´s in my

Re: [gmx-users] Hessian matrix conversion

2006-05-16 Thread Erik Lindahl
Hi, On May 15, 2006, at 10:02 PM, Lei Zhou wrote: Hi, I am trying to convert the binary Hessian matrix (nm.mtx) into a readable ascii format. According to the recommendations on this email list, I rename the nm.mtx to nm.trr and tried to use gmxdump. However, there is an error message li

RE: [gmx-users] kappa in Generalized reaction field

2006-05-16 Thread Berk Hess
From: Tomoshi Kameda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: [gmx-users] kappa in Generalized reaction field Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:35:31 +0900 > > > >Do we want to keep this code at all? > > Good question. > I think simulating io