milenkovicm opened a new issue, #1271:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1271
**Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe
what you are trying to do.**
to keep up with latest rust edition we need to update rust to 2024
**D
pepijnve commented on PR #16301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16301#issuecomment-2973145860
Superseded by #16398
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
pepijnve closed pull request #16301: Improve ability to cancel queries quickly
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16301
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific commen
UBarney commented on code in PR #16210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16210#discussion_r2147410263
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/nested_loop_join.rs:
##
@@ -178,6 +187,18 @@ pub struct NestedLoopJoinExec {
metrics: ExecutionPlanMetricsSet,
///
CookiePieWw opened a new pull request, #16412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16412
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #15976.
## Rationale for this change
As title, wrap the max and min stats with `Inexact` or `Exact` respecting
jonathanc-n commented on PR #16023:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16023#issuecomment-2972877511
I will try to take a look at this this weekend @atahanyorganci
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub a
Dandandan commented on PR #16390:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16390#issuecomment-2972940062
> After some thinking I realized that it will still not need
`null_equals_null` support in the nestedloopjoin this will happen at planner
time, and it is more of a question on whet
pepijnve commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2973035858
Thinking about it some more. The evaluation type is intended to describe how
the operator computes record batches itself: lazy on demand, or by driving
things itself. I’m kind of tr
pepijnve commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2973036248
Open to suggestions on better names for these properties.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th
mbutrovich opened a new pull request, #1887:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1887
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
The existing code uses deprecated kernels. I am working on Utf8View support
fo
Dandandan commented on issue #15037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15037#issuecomment-2973296403
Really close now!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
codecov-commenter commented on PR #1887:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1887#issuecomment-2973321758
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1887?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
adriangb commented on PR #15770:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15770#issuecomment-2973326482
@Dandandan thank you so much for pushing this forward! Really appreciate the
help and collaboration.
Since you've been looking at the code do you have any thoughts on
https:/
nuno-faria commented on code in PR #1123:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1123#discussion_r2147168692
##
python/datafusion/dataframe.py:
##
@@ -704,38 +694,135 @@ def write_csv(self, path: str | pathlib.Path,
with_header: bool = False) -> None
def wr
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1147:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1147
Bumps [datafusion-ffi](https://github.com/apache/datafusion) from 47.0.0 to
48.0.0.
Commits
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/commit/33a32d4382bee7e3c705d0f55d05c24a1
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1148:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1148
Bumps [datafusion-substrait](https://github.com/apache/datafusion) from
47.0.0 to 48.0.0.
Commits
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/commit/33a32d4382bee7e3c705d0f55d0
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1152:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1152
Bumps [prost-types](https://github.com/tokio-rs/prost) from 0.13.5 to 0.14.0.
Changelog
Sourced from https://github.com/tokio-rs/prost/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md";>prost-types'
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1149:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1149
Bumps [object_store](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs-object-store) from
0.12.1 to 0.12.2.
Changelog
Sourced from https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs-object-store/blob/main
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1151:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1151
Bumps [datafusion-proto](https://github.com/apache/datafusion) from 47.0.0
to 48.0.0.
Commits
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/commit/33a32d4382bee7e3c705d0f55d05c24
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1150:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1150
Bumps [datafusion](https://github.com/apache/datafusion) from 47.0.0 to
48.0.0.
Commits
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/commit/33a32d4382bee7e3c705d0f55d05c24a115a2
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1153:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1153
Bumps [prost](https://github.com/tokio-rs/prost) from 0.13.5 to 0.14.0.
Changelog
Sourced from https://github.com/tokio-rs/prost/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md";>prost's
changelog
Dandandan commented on PR #16408:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16408#issuecomment-2973088391
I applied the changes to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15770
let's continue there
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
Dandandan closed pull request #16408: Apply filter early in TopK
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16408
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubsc
Dandandan commented on PR #15770:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15770#issuecomment-2973096992
@alamb could you rerun the benchmarks?
Maybe also run the topk benchmark (`topk_tpch`).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
Dandandan merged PR #16404:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16404
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
adriangb commented on PR #15770:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15770#issuecomment-2972849206
Let's merge your PR into here :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
comphead merged PR #16393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16393
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
comphead commented on code in PR #16409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16409#discussion_r2147442023
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/spark/datetime/current_timezone.slt:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or
shehabgamin commented on code in PR #16409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16409#discussion_r2147445532
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/spark/datetime/current_timezone.slt:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+#
comphead commented on PR #16409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16409#issuecomment-2973512315
Got it @shehabgamin
I'm seeing a lot of `slt` tests like
```
#S
#E
#query
#L
```
which not very explanatory.
For testing `spark` integ
comphead commented on code in PR #16397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16397#discussion_r2147429880
##
docs/source/contributor-guide/index.md:
##
@@ -108,6 +108,26 @@ Features above) prior to acceptance include:
[extensions list]: ../library-user-guide/extensio
comphead commented on code in PR #16391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16391#discussion_r2147430655
##
datafusion/functions-table/src/generate_series.rs:
##
@@ -197,11 +197,18 @@ impl TableFunctionImpl for GenerateSeriesFuncImpl {
}
let mut n
comphead commented on code in PR #16391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16391#discussion_r2147430611
##
datafusion/functions-table/src/generate_series.rs:
##
@@ -197,11 +197,18 @@ impl TableFunctionImpl for GenerateSeriesFuncImpl {
}
let mut n
shehabgamin commented on PR #16409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16409#issuecomment-2973501683
> Thanks @shehabgamin appreciate if you can provide more insight on the PR
details. It looks like a lot of tests commented out mostly from `spark` domain
and PR rationale didn't
comphead commented on PR #16409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16409#issuecomment-2973513172
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/blob/6bf80b107cc1574cb7f259719d0aa203e387efc4/spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionCoverageSuite.scala#L182
This is
jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16391#discussion_r2147445833
##
datafusion/functions-table/src/generate_series.rs:
##
@@ -197,11 +197,18 @@ impl TableFunctionImpl for GenerateSeriesFuncImpl {
}
let mu
comphead merged PR #16384:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16384
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
comphead closed issue #15915: [datafusion-spark] Example of using Spark
compatible function library
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15915
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
comphead closed issue #16383: Can't publish datafusion-spark crate due to error
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16383
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
comphead merged PR #16388:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16388
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
comphead commented on code in PR #16391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16391#discussion_r2147446520
##
datafusion/functions-table/src/generate_series.rs:
##
@@ -197,11 +197,18 @@ impl TableFunctionImpl for GenerateSeriesFuncImpl {
}
let mut n
ozankabak commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2973514966
> Thinking about it some more. The evaluation type is intended to describe
how the operator computes record batches itself: lazy on demand, or by driving
things itself. I’m kind of
comphead closed issue #14958: Table function supports non-literal args
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14958
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
comphead closed issue #16242: Improve sql planing performance (optimize
`try_process_unnest`)
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16242
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
comphead merged PR #16389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16389
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16391#discussion_r2147447123
##
datafusion/functions-table/src/generate_series.rs:
##
@@ -197,11 +197,18 @@ impl TableFunctionImpl for GenerateSeriesFuncImpl {
}
let mu
comphead commented on PR #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16360#issuecomment-2973517490
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16414
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
comphead opened a new issue, #16414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16414
Thanks @alamb
I'm creating a ticket to generate a `upgrade` guide or part of it from
`deprecated` attribute
_Originally posted by @comphead in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull
comphead commented on issue #16414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16414#issuecomment-2973518335
It would be nice having the `upgrade guide` updated automatically by
analyzing `deprecated` attributes by `since` param and attach the details to
the guide by running a script,
jonathanc-n opened a new issue, #16415:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16415
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
> that would be nice to show as an example, it is challenging to read
algorithms for upcoming contributors, but it can be done
jonathanc-n commented on issue #16415:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16415#issuecomment-2973518470
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16083:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16083#discussion_r2147448608
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/symmetric_hash_join.rs:
##
@@ -818,6 +822,20 @@ where
.collect();
(build_indices, probe_ind
adriangb commented on PR #16408:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16408#issuecomment-2972860809
Can you make a PR on our fork and we merge this into the main PR?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an
adriangb commented on PR #16408:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16408#issuecomment-2972862984
Or you can just push to the main PR, I gave you write access to our fork :)
My one question is: how does this optimization play with filter pushdown? If
a child plan accepted
Dandandan commented on PR #16408:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16408#issuecomment-2972888776
> Or you can just push to the main PR, I gave you write access to our fork :)
>
> My one question is: how does this optimization play with filter pushdown?
If a child plan ac
jonathanc-n commented on PR #16390:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16390#issuecomment-2973341692
@Dandandan Yes, it was mentioned in the original pull request. I concluded
that if it is better for the nested loop join to take a equijoin condition
(where one table's rows are
comphead commented on code in PR #16083:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16083#discussion_r2147425621
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/symmetric_hash_join.rs:
##
@@ -818,6 +822,20 @@ where
.collect();
(build_indices, probe_indice
comphead commented on PR #16083:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16083#issuecomment-2973494086
Thanks for this contribution, I'm planning to have this PR open for a little
bit of more time to see if there are any other feedbacks
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
comphead commented on code in PR #16399:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16399#discussion_r2147428069
##
docs/source/contributor-guide/roadmap.md:
##
@@ -46,81 +46,12 @@ make review efficient and avoid surprises.
# Quarterly Roadmap
-A quarterly roadmap will
comphead commented on code in PR #16401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16401#discussion_r2147428867
##
datafusion/catalog/src/schema.rs:
##
@@ -54,6 +55,14 @@ pub trait SchemaProvider: Debug + Sync + Send {
name: &str,
) -> Result>, DataFusionError
comphead commented on code in PR #16401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16401#discussion_r2147429310
##
datafusion/catalog/src/schema.rs:
##
@@ -54,6 +55,14 @@ pub trait SchemaProvider: Debug + Sync + Send {
name: &str,
) -> Result>, DataFusionError
comphead commented on code in PR #16397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16397#discussion_r2147429475
##
docs/source/contributor-guide/index.md:
##
@@ -108,6 +108,26 @@ Features above) prior to acceptance include:
[extensions list]: ../library-user-guide/extensio
milenkovicm opened a new pull request, #1269:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1269
# Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
# Rationale for this change
generate a changelog for ballista 47 release
# What changes are included in this
theirix commented on code in PR #16325:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16325#discussion_r2146926102
##
datafusion/sql/tests/sql_integration.rs:
##
@@ -4714,3 +4714,115 @@ fn test_using_join_wildcard_schema() {
]
);
}
+
+#[test]
Review Comment:
Dandandan commented on PR #16390:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16390#issuecomment-2973547633
> @Dandandan Yes, it was mentioned in the original pull request. I concluded
that if it is better for the nested loop join to take a equijoin condition
(where one table's rows are
iffyio commented on code in PR #1879:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1879#discussion_r2147453124
##
src/parser/mod.rs:
##
@@ -9947,6 +9947,51 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
Ok(IdentWithAlias { ident, alias })
}
+/// Parse `identifier [
jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16391#discussion_r2147461767
##
datafusion/functions-table/src/generate_series.rs:
##
@@ -197,11 +197,18 @@ impl TableFunctionImpl for GenerateSeriesFuncImpl {
}
let mu
Dandandan commented on PR #15770:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15770#issuecomment-2972642194
Results of applying this in TopK itself:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16408#issue-3145903557
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respon
JigaoLuo commented on issue #16149:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16149#issuecomment-2972640469
Hi @alamb @zhuqi-lucas ,
I recently encountered an issue and it is very nice. Thanks.
I am also curious: **Why would uncompressed Parquet be considered an
optimization
codecov-commenter commented on PR #1874:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1874#issuecomment-2972716900
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1874?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
shehabgamin commented on PR #16409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16409#issuecomment-2972618052
Not sure if it makes sense to commit the script I used, so I'll paste it
here for now:
```
"""
WARNING:
- This script extracts only basic, straightforward tests.
shehabgamin opened a new pull request, #16409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16409
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes tes
ozankabak commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2972621416
> While I was writing this I started wondering if evaluation type should be
a per child thing. In my spawn experiment branch for instance hash join is
eager for the build side, but
Chen-Yuan-Lai commented on code in PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16324#discussion_r2146791719
##
datafusion/core/tests/sql/explain_analyze.rs:
##
@@ -52,43 +54,45 @@ async fn explain_analyze_baseline_metrics() {
let formatted = arrow::util::prett
Dandandan commented on PR #15770:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15770#issuecomment-2972552039
I am reapplying my PR on top of this branch, I'll report my results.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHu
trompa commented on PR #1874:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1874#issuecomment-2972493584
@mbutrovich ive locally moved hour/minute/seconds implementation to a macro.
I could potentially be able to reuse if for other functions i dont see
implemented: day/month/year
Dandandan commented on PR #15770:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15770#issuecomment-2972769559
Combined with changes in my PR
(https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16408), this is looking sweet for
the TopK benchmarks:
```
Benchmark run_topk_tpch.json
-
mbutrovich commented on code in PR #1862:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1862#discussion_r2146947020
##
common/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/CometConf.scala:
##
@@ -307,6 +307,18 @@ object CometConf extends ShimCometConf {
.booleanConf
.crea
Dandandan opened a new pull request, #16410:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16410
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes teste
Dandandan opened a new issue, #16411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16411
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
We want to extend topk test to test it a bit more extensively.
### Describe the solution you'd like
Add a command to
Dandandan merged PR #16410:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16410
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
Dandandan closed issue #16411: Add TopK benchmark
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16411
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Dandandan commented on PR #16410:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16410#issuecomment-2972782892
Thanks for the quick review @adriangb
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Dandandan opened a new pull request, #16408:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16408
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes teste
Dandandan commented on code in PR #15770:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15770#discussion_r2146805677
##
datafusion/common/src/config.rs:
##
@@ -614,6 +614,13 @@ config_namespace! {
/// during aggregations, if possible
pub enable_topk_aggregatio
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #16395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16395#discussion_r2146810315
##
datafusion-examples/examples/embedding_parquet_indexes.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more c
Dandandan closed pull request #15697: Optimize TopK with threshold filter ~1.4x
speedup
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15697
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the speci
Dandandan commented on PR #15697:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15697#issuecomment-2972592373
This will be replaced by https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16408
with the PR from @adriangb
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to th
JigaoLuo opened a new issue, #16407:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16407
Hi datafusion team,
First, thank you for consistently publishing [high-quality
blogs](https://datafusion.apache.org/blog/)! I appreciate the effort behind
them.
Feedback & Suggestions:
milenkovicm opened a new pull request, #1270:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1270
# Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
# Rationale for this change
- keep up with datafusion release
# What changes are included in this PR?
90 matches
Mail list logo
