Let me add some text I wrote for another place but that explains how things
would work:
1) The OpenSource definition http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php
section 9 makes it very clear that an OSS license must not restrict other
software and must not prevent to bundle different works un
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:49:22 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> I've just experimented a bit with that and it turned out that
> --depclean doesn't clean up the buildtime-only deps. But if I
> remove one of them (eg. cabextract), they don't get pulled in again
> (that's indicating the depending ebuild
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:55:04PM -0500, Paul Hartman wrote
>
> I had a similar message, it was there because of the fact that i
> specified the wrong (or failed to specify?) mtrr method in my kernel
> boot parameters for the framebuffer. I'm using uvesafb and in kernel
> documentation (/usr/src/
2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon :
> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar Hinz
> did opine thusly:
>
>> The gentoo wiki suggests in different places to set the LINGUAS
>> environment variable in make.conf.
>>
>> What has LINGUAS todo with make? I would expect it in rc.con
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:48 on Thursday 19 August 2010, Elmar Hinz
did opine thusly:
> 2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon :
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar
> > Hinz
> >
> > did opine thusly:
> >> The gentoo wiki suggests in different places to set the
Thank you all.
On 19 August 2010 14:48, Elmar Hinz wrote:
> 2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon :
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar
> Hinz
> > did opine thusly:
> >
> >> The gentoo wiki suggests in different places to set the LINGUAS
> >> environment variable in make.conf.
> >>
>
Elmar Hinz writes:
> 2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon :
>> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar Hinz
>> did opine thusly:
>>
>>> The gentoo wiki suggests in different places to set the LINGUAS
>>> environment variable in make.conf.
>>>
>>> What has LINGUAS todo with mak
On 19 août 2010, at 14:27, Graham Murray wrote:
> Elmar Hinz writes:
>
>> 2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon :
>>> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar
>>> Hinz
>>> did opine thusly:
>>>
The gentoo wiki suggests in different places to set the LINGUAS
environ
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:05:05 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> But for critical production machines? Not a flying chance in hell :-)
> Too many times I've had to sort out the carnage from idiotic juniors
> who blindly run "emerge -uND world" and walk away thinking Unix always
> works like RedHat.
Why
>> Even than, LINGUAS has rather to do with OpenOffice.
>>
>> Has it anything to do with portage at all?
>
> Several packages, not just OpenOffice, can include/support different
> languages. Portage uses the value of LINGUAS to tell these packages
> which languages to include/support.
>
When Port
On 8/19/10, Elmar Hinz wrote:
>>> Even than, LINGUAS has rather to do with OpenOffice.
>>>
>>> Has it anything to do with portage at all?
>>
>> Several packages, not just OpenOffice, can include/support different
>> languages. Portage uses the value of LINGUAS to tell these packages
>> which langu
On 8/19/10, Florian CROUZAT wrote:
>
> On 19 août 2010, at 14:27, Graham Murray wrote:
>
>> Several packages, not just OpenOffice, can include/support different
>> languages. Portage uses the value of LINGUAS to tell these packages
>> which languages to include/support.
>
> I have access to this b
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:50:02 +0200, Elmar Hinz wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] LINGUAS:
>2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon :
>> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010,
>> Elmar Hinz did opine thusly:
>>
>>> The gentoo wiki suggests in different places to set the LINGUAS
>>> environm
> On the other hand LINGUAS is still a general variable AFAIK and not
> portage specific.
LINGUAS is strictly portage-specific. It's used to control the
compile-time inclusion of languages and/or locales for packages which
have that kind of option (i.e. OpenOffice, KDE, Firefox and many
others); a
>
> No, I think you're mixing up compile-time and run-time values -- and
> also reading too much into the file names. "make.conf" should really
> rather be called "portage.conf". That would make much more sense IMHO.
> :)
>
As long as the source is the documentation, it should be possible by
conce
2010/8/19 Andrea Conti :
>> On the other hand LINGUAS is still a general variable AFAIK and not
>> portage specific.
>
> LINGUAS is strictly portage-specific.
Really?
Researching the web I understand it origins from gettext and portage
has implemented it. If I understand right, it would still mat
On 08/19/2010 05:37 AM, Florian CROUZAT wrote:
>
> On 19 août 2010, at 14:27, Graham Murray wrote:
>
>> Elmar Hinz writes:
>>
>>> 2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon :
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar
Hinz
did opine thusly:
> The gentoo wiki s
On 08/19/2010 06:53 AM, Elmar Hinz wrote:
> 2010/8/19 Andrea Conti :
>>> On the other hand LINGUAS is still a general variable AFAIK and not
>>> portage specific.
>>
>> LINGUAS is strictly portage-specific.
>
> Really?
>
> Researching the web I understand it origins from gettext and portage
> has
On 08/19/2010 04:37 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:55:04PM -0500, Paul Hartman wrote
>>
>> I had a similar message, it was there because of the fact that i
>> specified the wrong (or failed to specify?) mtrr method in my kernel
>> boot parameters for the framebuffer. I'm using
Am 18.08.2010 21:30, schrieb Elmar Hinz:
> 1.) Is there a Map: modules to configration parameters?
>
> "lspci -k" lists me all modules of the running genkernel.
> Unfortunately the configuration parameters of the kernel have
> different names.
>
>
> 2.) Which approach would you recommend?
>
Wi
Hi list!
I'd like to change the LINGUAS setting for a single package. Is there a
config file for stuff like this?
The thing is: I want to prevent the installation of German man-pages
because they are generally inferior to the English originals and while I
appreciate the work done to translate the
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:49 on Thursday 19 August 2010, Neil
Bothwick did opine thusly:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:05:05 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > But for critical production machines? Not a flying chance in hell :-)
> > Too many times I've had to sort out the carnage from idiotic j
try in package.use something like
app-office/openoffice-bin linguas_en_GB linguas_de
Mirek
2010/8/19 Florian Philipp
> Hi list!
>
> I'd like to change the LINGUAS setting for a single package. Is there a
> config file for stuff like this?
>
> The thing is: I want to prevent the installation of G
On 19/08/2010 17:49, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> I'd like to change the LINGUAS setting for a single package. Is there a
> config file for stuff like this?
LINGUAS (like VIDEO_CARDS, INPUT_DEVICES and similar stuff) is declared
as an USE_EXPAND variable, so that its contents get automat
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:55:02 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Besides, if I don't give them some form of responsibility they will
> never become responsible.
Unfortunately, the converse is not necessarily true :(
--
Neil Bothwick
We have a equal opportunity Calculus class -- it's fully integrate
Hi all,
I'm trying to get Flash (10.1.82.76) installed (and working) on
Firefox (3.6.8). I installed adobe-flash and, for good measure,
libflash and libflashsupport:
media-libs/libflash-0.4.10-r1
www-plugins/libflashsupport-1.2 USE="esd gnutls oss pulseaudio -ssl"
www-plugins/adobe-flash-10.1.82
Em 19-08-2010 14:34, Hilco Wijbenga escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to get Flash (10.1.82.76) installed (and working) on
> Firefox (3.6.8). I installed adobe-flash and, for good measure,
> libflash and libflashsupport:
>
> media-libs/libflash-0.4.10-r1
> www-plugins/libflashsupport-1.2 USE="es
On 19 August 2010 11:00, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
> I don't have neither
>
> media-libs/libflash or
> www-plugins/libflashsupport
>
> installed here, only the same version of adobe-flash in x86_64 enviroment.
> In adobe site above i receive this answer:
>
> You have version 10,1,82,76 installed
>
> Of
On 08/19/2010 08:34 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to get Flash (10.1.82.76) installed (and working) on
Firefox (3.6.8). I installed adobe-flash and, for good measure,
libflash and libflashsupport:
media-libs/libflash-0.4.10-r1
www-plugins/libflashsupport-1.2 USE="esd gnutls oss
Em 19-08-2010 15:49, Nikos Chantziaras escreveu:
> On 08/19/2010 08:34 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to get Flash (10.1.82.76) installed (and working) on
>> Firefox (3.6.8). I installed adobe-flash and, for good measure,
>> libflash and libflashsupport:
>>
>> media-libs/lib
On 19 August 2010 11:49, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> It seems like you have installed it locally. To find out where it is,
> execute this (as normal user):
>
> lsof | grep flash
>
> Firefox must be running and flash loaded (opening a YouTube video should do
> it.)
Brilliant! That was the problem
I use mysqldump to back up a database from a development environment and
upload it to a production environment.
A couple of days ago I was surprised to see that I was getting errors as soon
as I uploaded the backed up database to the production machine! I repeated
the backup (more in disbelief
On 19 August 2010 11:59, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
> Did you erased ~/.mozilla directory?
>
> Calm down first, but think thirst in "mv .mozilla MOZILLA-BCK", then try use
> firefox again.
:-) I'm quite calm. :-) I didn't erase the whole directory just the
lib for the plugin in .mozilla/plugins. That di
On 8/19/2010 9:33 AM, Andrea Conti wrote:
>> On the other hand LINGUAS is still a general variable AFAIK and not
>> portage specific.
>
> LINGUAS is strictly portage-specific. It's used to control the
> compile-time inclusion of languages and/or locales for packages which
> have that kind of optio
On 8/19/2010 9:53 AM, Elmar Hinz wrote:
> But is the following generalization correct?
>
> * LINGUAS is the compile time setting (for multiple languages)
> * LANG is the runtime setting (for the current language).
Yes, as long as you're aware that LINGUAS support is recommended, but
optional. A
I just got this elog from updating my gentoo system. It's from
freetype-2.4.2:
begin --
LOG (postinst)
The TrueType bytecode interpreter is no longer patented and thus no
longer controlled by the bindist USE flag. Enable the auto-hinter
US
>
> With new enough kernel sources (gentoo-sources in stable are good
> enough), there is `make localmodconfig` which removes all mods from your
> current .config which are not loaded.
> There is also `make localyesconfig` which does the same but doesn't
> create modules.
>
> Hope this helps,
Yes.
On 08/19/2010 10:03 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 19 August 2010 11:49, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
It seems like you have installed it locally. To find out where it is,
execute this (as normal user):
lsof | grep flash
Firefox must be running and flash loaded (opening a YouTube video should do
On Thursday 19 August 2010 15:47:46 Bill Longman wrote:
> On 08/19/2010 04:37 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:55:04PM -0500, Paul Hartman wrote
> >
> >> I had a similar message, it was there because of the fact that i
> >> specified the wrong (or failed to specify?) mtrr meth
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Mick wrote:
> I think my mtrr is OK, but I do not understand this enough to know if it would
> benefit from manual configuration.
I think, from the error you posted about originally, it's just letting
you know: "Hey, your MTRR was set wrong and we've changed it fo
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:21:20 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> So I looked up "auto-hinter" in the flagedit(1) program. It says:
> > auto-hinter: Local Flag: Use the unpatented auto-hinter instead of
> > the
> (recommended) TrueType bytecode interpreter (media-libs/freetype)
>
> The placement of
On Thursday 19 August 2010 22:43:19 Paul Hartman wrote:
> I think, from the error you posted about originally, it's just
> letting you know: "Hey, your MTRR was set wrong and we've changed it
> for you". So changing it would simply make the message go away but
> not actually perform any differentl
On Thursday 19 August 2010 21:21:20 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> So I looked up "auto-hinter" in the flagedit(1) program. It says:
> auto-hinter: Local Flag: Use the unpatented auto-hinter instead
> of the (recommended) TrueType bytecode interpreter (media-
> libs/freetype)
>
> The placement of the "(
Hello,
I've just sync'd my machine, and realized I'm pulling in a few packages from
the devnull overlay that I would rather not. freetype / fontconfig / cairo
for example and it's causing
some conflicts when I try to update (-auvND world). I mainly use devnull for
uzbl, dmenu, and my window manger
On 8/19/2010 12:03 PM, Mick wrote:
I use mysqldump to back up a database from a development environment and
upload it to a production environment.
A couple of days ago I was surprised to see that I was getting errors as soon
as I uploaded the backed up database to the production machine! I repe
> It's the "official" (as far as
> there is such a thing) place to store the list of gettext translations
> you want on your system, and most autotools-based builds and binary
> package managers also recognize it.
I didn't know that. Thanks for clarifying!
andrea
47 matches
Mail list logo
