Am Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 10:03:01AM +0800 schrieb William Kenworthy:
> > > That
> > > said btrfs has its less than stellar moments. I still have systems that
> > > use
> > > ext4 and they "seem" reliable for light duty but I make sure I have
> > > backups
> > > and do not trust them with anythin
On 29/4/23 19:45, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 01:20:52PM +0800 schrieb William Kenworthy:
Filesystem choice is very much to do with your particular use case.
I am not a fan of ext4 - lost too much data too many times. I ve found
btrfs and xfs much tougher, and the onli
Am Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 02:04:52PM +0100 schrieb Michael:
> On Saturday, 29 April 2023 12:45:31 BST Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > Am Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 01:20:52PM +0800 schrieb William Kenworthy:
>
> > > That
> > > said btrfs has its less than stellar moments. I still have systems that
> > > us
On Saturday, 29 April 2023 12:45:31 BST Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 01:20:52PM +0800 schrieb William Kenworthy:
> > That
> > said btrfs has its less than stellar moments. I still have systems that
> > use ext4 and they "seem" reliable for light duty but I make sure I have
Am Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 01:20:52PM +0800 schrieb William Kenworthy:
> Filesystem choice is very much to do with your particular use case.
>
> I am not a fan of ext4 - lost too much data too many times. I ve found
> btrfs and xfs much tougher, and the online tools much more convenient.
I’ve been
Am Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 04:58:02PM +0200 schrieb tastytea:
> > Does the transparent compression incur an overhead cost in processing,
> > memory use, or disk writes? I feel like it certainly has to at least
> > use more memory. Sorry if that's an RTFM question.
>
> it'll use more cpu and memory
On 28/4/23 21:21, Michael wrote:
On Friday, 28 April 2023 13:54:37 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Friday, 28 April 2023 10:08:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
230428 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2023 13:23:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in
On Friday, 28 April 2023 13:54:37 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday, 28 April 2023 10:08:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
> > 230428 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 27 April 2023 13:23:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
> > >> I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in 2022
> > >> & am at t
On Friday, 28 April 2023 10:08:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
> 230428 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Thursday, 27 April 2023 13:23:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
> >> I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in 2022
> >> & am at the point of designing the partitions.
> >> For many years, I've used R
230428 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 April 2023 13:23:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
>> I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in 2022
>> & am at the point of designing the partitions.
>> For many years, I've used Reiserfs, but it is now obsolescent,
>> so I need to choose an alter
On Thursday, 27 April 2023 13:23:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
> I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in 2022
> & am at the point of designing the partitions.
>
> For many years, I've used Reiserfs, but it is now obsolescent,
> so I need to choose an alternative. Reiserfs seemed appropr
On 27.04.23 14:23, Philip Webb wrote:
I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in 2022
& am at the point of designing the partitions.
For many years, I've used Reiserfs, but it is now obsolescent,
so I need to choose an alternative. Reiserfs seemed appropriate
for a system with a larg
On 04/27/2023 02:23:01 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in 2022
& am at the point of designing the partitions.
For many years, I've used Reiserfs, but it is now obsolescent,
so I need to choose an alternative. Reiserfs seemed appropriate
for a system wit
On 2023-04-27 16:52+0100 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:54:34 +0200, tastytea wrote:
>
> > btrfs and zfs have some useful features for normal use cases. the
> > transparent compression can save a lot of space and even increase
> > speed in some cases, the checksumming guarantees t
On 27/04/2023 16:52, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:54:34 +0200, tastytea wrote:
btrfs and zfs have some useful features for normal use cases. the
transparent compression can save a lot of space and even increase speed
in some cases, the checksumming guarantees that you will never
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:54:34 +0200, tastytea wrote:
> btrfs and zfs have some useful features for normal use cases. the
> transparent compression can save a lot of space and even increase speed
> in some cases, the checksumming guarantees that you will never get a
> corrupt file
That's only true
On 2023-04-27 10:14-0400 Matt Connell wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 15:54 +0200, tastytea wrote:
> > btrfs and zfs have some useful features for normal use cases. the
> > transparent compression can save a lot of space and even increase
> > speed in some cases, the checksumming guarantees that y
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 15:54 +0200, tastytea wrote:
> btrfs and zfs have some useful features for normal use cases. the
> transparent compression can save a lot of space and even increase speed
> in some cases, the checksumming guarantees that you will never get a
> corrupt file and snapshots make b
On 2023-04-27 09:34-0400 Matt Connell wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 08:23 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> > Ext4 seems to be used by well-known binary distros.
>
> There's a reason for this. It can fulfill all but the most niche or
> intensive roles, is robustly supported, well-tested both in
>
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 08:23 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> Ext4 seems to be used by well-known binary distros.
There's a reason for this. It can fulfill all but the most niche or
intensive roles, is robustly supported, well-tested both in development
and through wide use in the field, and generally
Philip Webb wrote:
> I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in 2022
> & am at the point of designing the partitions.
>
> For many years, I've used Reiserfs, but it is now obsolescent,
> so I need to choose an alternative. Reiserfs seemed appropriate
> for a system with a large number o
I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in 2022
& am at the point of designing the partitions.
For many years, I've used Reiserfs, but it is now obsolescent,
so I need to choose an alternative. Reiserfs seemed appropriate
for a system with a large number of small files.
Ext4 seems to b
22 matches
Mail list logo
