If I understand correctly,
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Distcc#CFLAGS_and_CXXFLAGS is saying that
CFLAGS should be set to the output of gcc -v -E -x c -march=native
-mtune=native - < /dev/null 2>&1 | grep cc1 | perl -pe 's/^.* - //g;'
Checking the output;
$ gcc -v -E -x c -march=native -mtune=nati
Watching top, i notice some gcc instances run under the portage user and
others under the distcc user - is that normal?
The gentoo distcc wiki page states "If compilations should also occur on
the local machine, put localhost in the hosts list. Conversely if the local
machine is not to be used to
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:47 PM, João Matos wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> I'v installed gentoo in my notebook, and I'm trying to setup distcc, to
share the 8 cores from my gentoo desktop. Both systemd systems. I followed
this: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Distcc .
>
> Situation:
>
> 1) systemctl start
Dear list,
I'v installed gentoo in my notebook, and I'm trying to setup distcc, to
share the 8 cores from my gentoo desktop. Both systemd systems. I followed
this: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Distcc .
Situation:
1) systemctl start distccd
gives me no erro, no log file, and according to nmap, th
"Walter Dnes" writes:
> First of all, thanks to everybody who answered my questions, and
> helped me get it working. Now for the setup. This is a home LAN, so I
> don't bother with ssh tunneling, etc, which will be necessary if you're
> going over untrusted links, e.g. the public internet.
>
First of all, thanks to everybody who answered my questions, and
helped me get it working. Now for the setup. This is a home LAN, so I
don't bother with ssh tunneling, etc, which will be necessary if you're
going over untrusted links, e.g. the public internet.
* The host, IP address 192.168.12
On 02/20/2015 05:19 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> Looks like you are using pump mode. Disable it and use "normal"
> distcc.
>
This was the cause. Just an update.
Dan
On 02/20/2015 05:19 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Looks like you are using pump mode. Disable it and use "normal"
> distcc.
Yes, I read about how it works and enabled it. Of course I didn't think
of that when these errors happened. I'll try disabling that shortly.
> Yes, there is. Create a file /
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:09:02 -0800 Daniel Frey wrote:
> Well, I decided to try distcc once again and set up a few machine to do so.
>
> I have set the -march directive on each machine to its own (and not
> "native"), and set up the accesses. It seems to work on most packages.
>
> However, I've fo
Well, I decided to try distcc once again and set up a few machine to do so.
I have set the -march directive on each machine to its own (and not
"native"), and set up the accesses. It seems to work on most packages.
However, I've found that there's some packages that just don't work:
-mysql/maria
On Sunday 14 Oct 2012 15:47:31 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> The compilation of a short C-program from the commandline
> works...the job can be seen in the distcc log on the beaglebone.
>
> But emergeing (in this case "emerge cmus") completly ignores
> distcc
>
> How can I fix it?
Hi,
I've da
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14.10.2012 15:47, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since my PC /and/ my embedded singlecomputer are involved, I dont
> know whether this is a "normal GENTOO" subject or a "embedded
> GENTOO" one...
>
> What I want: From my embedded system (Bea
Hi,
since my PC /and/ my embedded singlecomputer are involved,
I dont know whether this is a "normal GENTOO" subject or a
"embedded GENTOO" one...
What I want:
>From my embedded system (Beaglebone) I want to sent compilation
jobs to my PC.
I set up cross-compiler on my PC, configured distcc and
Am 27.09.2012 um 23:34 schrieb Andrea Conti:
>> Thanks for this link, I have read it before I write the post. Did I
>> understand thr problem correct:
>> I need a full OSX compatible toolchain !? So I download all Apple developer
>> tools, compile
>> it under my Gentoo box and add all header fi
> Thanks for this link, I have read it before I write the post. Did I
> understand thr problem correct:
> I need a full OSX compatible toolchain !? So I download all Apple developer
> tools, compile
> it under my Gentoo box and add all header files which I used under OSX to my
> Linux box?
Acco
Am 27.09.2012 um 20:33 schrieb Andrea Conti:
>
>> I think I must add a "OSX specified symbolic link".
>
> Symlinks are only needed on the distcc client, not on the server running
> distccd. But that is a trivial matter.
>
>> Which tools / configuration must be set for cross-compiling OSX code
> I think I must add a "OSX specified symbolic link".
Symlinks are only needed on the distcc client, not on the server running
distccd. But that is a trivial matter.
> Which tools / configuration must be set for cross-compiling OSX code on my
> Gentoo box?
You need to put together a complete O
Hello,
I have installed distccd on my Gentoo box and I would like to use it from a OSX
Snow Leopard.
The distcc daemon runs on the Gentoo box and my OSX clients connect the box. I
can run distcc on my OSX and it send the code to the Gentoo box and compile it.
But my cross-compiling does not work
on 06/14/2012 02:05 AM YoYo Siska wrote the following:
>
> 3. Mount the laptops root filesystem through nfs on the fast computer
> (use no_root_squash on the laptop export to have correct root access to
> files) bind-mount something local (disk or tmpfs if you have enough mem)
> over /var/tmp/por
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 01:49:16AM +0530, Yohan Pereira wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:43:20AM +0200, Daniel Wagener wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 01:04:19 -0500
> >
> > What about a different approach: gentoo in a VM on the desktop
> > Would that not be much easier?
> > Of course some proce
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:43:20AM +0200, Daniel Wagener wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 01:04:19 -0500
>
> What about a different approach: gentoo in a VM on the desktop
> Would that not be much easier?
> Of course some processor power is used for the VM itself, but it should still
> significantly
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 01:04:19 -0500
Christopher Lemire wrote:
> Hello Gentoo users, I have one of the higher end pentium 3s running at 1ghz
> on a laptop. I have started to install Gentoo on it. Once Stage 3
> (Hardened) and Portage were installed, the first things I installed
> were vim and distc
Hello Gentoo users, I have one of the higher end pentium 3s running at 1ghz
on a laptop. I have started to install Gentoo on it. Once Stage 3
(Hardened) and Portage were installed, the first things I installed
were vim and distcc. My desktop is a amd quad core at 2.8 ghz stock.
When I had Gentoo on
aks threading.
> 2) It does bad rewriting of subjects. (I'm replying to a message
> titled "[gentoo-user] «-»: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-user] «-»:
> [gentoo-user] Distcc advice needed")
> 3) It's sending HTML emails which explicitly sets the font size of the
> text be
eaks threading.
2) It does bad rewriting of subjects. (I'm replying to a message
titled "[gentoo-user] «-»: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-user] «-»:
[gentoo-user] Distcc advice needed")
3) It's sending HTML emails which explicitly sets the font size of the
text being quoted. (On my syst
I've overcome that problem by modifying ssh wrapper script by
adding -F /location/of/.ssh/config
Right now Im going to test it
S
On 2012-06-05 18:00, Michael Mol wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Samuraiii wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Samuraiii wrote:
> Thanks for help, this problem is not the one that aches me right now - and
> when I re-thaught it again I simply realized that it dissapeared.
>
> BUT
> Do somebody know how from distcc tell ssh which port to use to connect to
> remote machine -
Thanks for help, this problem is not the one that aches me right
now - and when I re-thaught it again I simply realized that it
dissapeared.
BUT
Do somebody know how from distcc tell ssh which port to use to
connect to remote machine - all of "
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 16:44:19 +0200
Samuraiii wrote:
> Hello friends,
> I'm in need of good advice.
> I have 3 computers running gentoo and want to utilise all of them for
> distcc compiling - the emerging computer would be everytime different.
> Two machines are amd64 and one is x86 and this appe
Hello friends,
I'm in need of good advice.
I have 3 computers running gentoo and want to utilise all of them
for distcc compiling - the emerging computer would be everytime
different. Two machines are amd64 and one is x86 and this appears
to be proble
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 02/05/2012 01:46 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> It does the same for portages work space too. I have portages work
>> directory on tmpfs and I always have to mount with the size=12g option
>> so that LOo will even start.
>>
>> Thing is, it rarely uses more than 4Gbs or so. Is
On 02/05/2012 01:46 PM, Dale wrote:
It does the same for portages work space too. I have portages work
directory on tmpfs and I always have to mount with the size=12g option
so that LOo will even start.
Thing is, it rarely uses more than 4Gbs or so. Is there a way to
disable this mess? I got
Samuraiii wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 2012-02-05 18:38, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Samuraiii wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have (right now) 3 computers runing Gentoo and as two of them are with
>>> only 1GB of ram - which for libreoffice compiling is not enough.
>>>
>>> So my
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Samuraiii wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have (right now) 3 computers runing Gentoo and as two of them are with
> only 1GB of ram - which for libreoffice compiling is not enough.
Mmmh. LibreOffice 3.4.x requires 1 GB of RAM, all other versions in
portage requires only 512
On 2012-02-05 18:38, Michael Mol wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Samuraiii wrote:
Hello,
I have (right now) 3 computers runing Gentoo and as two of them are with
only 1GB of ram - which for libreoffice compiling is no
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Samuraiii wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have (right now) 3 computers runing Gentoo and as two of them are with
> only 1GB of ram - which for libreoffice compiling is not enough.
>
> So my questions are:
>
> 1) Is it possible with distcc overcome this memory limitation? -ca
Hello,
I have (right now) 3 computers runing Gentoo and as two of them
are with only 1GB of ram - which for libreoffice compiling is not
enough.
So my questions are:
1) Is it possible with distcc overcome this memory limitation?
On Sunday 03 April 2011 18:24:51 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Logging isn't working for me yet either,
I should have said that e-mailing of logs isn't working.
--
Rgds
Peter
On Sunday 03 April 2011 18:08:25 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> You probably don't want EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--usepkg" in the chroot's
> make.conf.
In fact I don't have it in either of them; so far I've been issuing manual
parameters. When I've settled the process down I'll encapsulate it in scripts.
>
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 14:55:39 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Yes. the script that I use to start up and enter the chroot for each
> > system not only does the usual mounting of /dev/ and /proc in the
> > chroot, it also rsyncs /etc/portage and /var/lib/portage/world* with
> > the real target. Make
On Saturday 02 April 2011 23:47:42 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Yes. the script that I use to start up and enter the chroot for each
> system not only does the usual mounting of /dev/ and /proc in the
> chroot, it also rsyncs /etc/portage and /var/lib/portage/world* with the
> real target. Make.conf has
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 16:19:45 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I've found there's just too much overhead with distcc, plus much of
> > the work is still done locally. I have a couple of Atom boxes, a
> > server and a netbook, and I've set up a chroot for each on my
> > workstation. In the chroot I h
On Saturday 18 December 2010 10:18:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I've found there's just too much overhead with distcc, plus much of the
> work is still done locally. I have a couple of Atom boxes, a server and a
> netbook, and I've set up a chroot for each on my workstation. In the
> chroot I have FE
On Saturday 02 April 2011 09:57:57 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Could you please confirm that the infection is in no way linked to me or
> my "method" :-O
Gladly. Not sure what it's linked to, nor even what it is, but it doesn't half
sap the energy.
--
Rgds
Peter
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:43:44 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
I've decided to revert to Neil's method (once I've shaken this
infection off).
Could you please confirm that the infection is in no way linked to me or
my "method" :-O
I hope you get rid of the infe
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:43:44 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I've decided to revert to Neil's method (once I've shaken this
> infection off).
Could you please confirm that the infection is in no way linked to me or
my "method" :-O
--
Neil Bothwick
Always proofread carefully to see if you any w
On Saturday 18 December 2010 10:18:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:56:29 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I've bought (against my better judgement) an Atom N270 box to be a LAN
> > server, but it's a bit slow compared with the other boxes on the
> > network. A big bit, actually - 6
Hello all,
I am doing a fresh install for a new machine with the help of distcc.
3 64bit machines with one one them having a no-multilib installation.
It is indeed impossible to compile 32bit binaries on that machine.
Does this matter in my amd64 distcc setup?
Or will the job fail, and distcc r
On Thursday 23 December 2010 14:44:25 I wrote:
> I get this on the workstation when trying to nfs-mount the exported
> PKGDIR:
>
> # mount /mnt/nfs
> mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified
The system log on vt12 says "bad mount option value specified: vers=4".
Ah-hah! I thought. All
On Saturday 18 December 2010 10:18:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I've found there's just too much overhead with distcc, plus much of
> the work is still done locally. I have a couple of Atom boxes, a
> server and a netbook, and I've set up a chroot for each on my
> workstation. In the chroot I have FE
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Bill Longman wrote:
> On 12/18/2010 07:15 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday 18 December 2010 10:18:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >
> >> I've found there's just too much overhead with distcc, plus much of
> >> the work is still done locally.
> >
> > I expected t
On 12/18/2010 07:15 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 18 December 2010 10:18:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> I've found there's just too much overhead with distcc, plus much of
>> the work is still done locally.
>
> I expected that but I wanted to try it to see.
>
>> I have a couple of Atom b
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Stroller
wrote:
>
> On 17/12/2010, at 10:56pm, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> ... an Atom N270 box ... server, but it's a bit slow compared with the other
>> boxes on the
>> network. A big bit, actually - 69 minutes to compile a kernel compared
>> with less than 9 minut
On Friday 17 December 2010 23:23:10 Jacob Todd wrote:
> Could you post your distcc config files?
$ extract /etc/conf.d/distccd
DISTCCD_OPTS=""
DISTCCD_EXEC="/usr/bin/distccd"
DISTCCD_PIDFILE="/var/run/distccd/distccd.pid"
DISTCCD_OPTS="${DISTCCD_OPTS} --port 3632"
DISTCCD_OPTS="${DISTCCD_OPTS} --l
On Saturday 18 December 2010 10:18:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I've found there's just too much overhead with distcc, plus much of
> the work is still done locally.
I expected that but I wanted to try it to see.
> I have a couple of Atom boxes, a server and a netbook, and I've set up
> a chroot fo
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:56:29 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I've bought (against my better judgement) an Atom N270 box to be a LAN
> server, but it's a bit slow compared with the other boxes on the
> network. A big bit, actually - 69 minutes to compile a kernel compared
> with less than 9 minut
On 17/12/2010, at 10:56pm, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> ... an Atom N270 box ... server, but it's a bit slow compared with the other
> boxes on the
> network. A big bit, actually - 69 minutes to compile a kernel compared
> with less than 9 minutes on this workstation.
9 minutes!?!? I'm flabbergaste
On Friday 17 December 2010 22:56:29 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I've bought (against my better judgement) an Atom N270 box to be a LAN
> server, but it's a bit slow compared with the other boxes on the
> network. A big bit, actually - 69 minutes to compile a kernel compared
> with less
Could you post your distcc config files?
Hello list,
I've bought (against my better judgement) an Atom N270 box to be a LAN
server, but it's a bit slow compared with the other boxes on the
network. A big bit, actually - 69 minutes to compile a kernel compared
with less than 9 minutes on this workstation.
I thought I'd give distcc a g
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:57:25 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
> If I want to set up an x86 distcc solution, do the USE flags need to be
> the same on all machines?
No. the USE flags determine options passed to the build system, so the
host's flags are interpreted before anything is sent to any di
Le Thursday 14 October 2010 07:57:25, Coert Waagmeester a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> Still new to gentoo. I use RHEL a lot.
>
> If I want to set up an x86 distcc solution, do the USE flags need to be
> the same on all machines?
>
> Trying to setup/compile all desktop apps on one machine with two
>
Hello all,
Still new to gentoo. I use RHEL a lot.
If I want to set up an x86 distcc solution, do the USE flags need to be
the same on all machines?
Trying to setup/compile all desktop apps on one machine with two
assisting in compilation.
Regards,
Coert Waagmeester
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:59:07PM -0400, Philip Webb wrote
> Does anyone know how far it's feasible to compile pkgs on a desktop
> -- I have a powerful machine with upto-date Gentoo for everyday use -- ,
> then copy the results via USB stick into a netbook ?
See http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/di
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 18:58 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Michael Sullivan writes:
>
> > I see those lines in /var/log/messages on the fast machine:
> >
> > carter ~ # grep dcc_job_summary /var/log/*
> > grep: /var/log/mailman: No such file or directory
> > /var/log/messages:Oct 17 09:09:31 carte
Michael Sullivan writes:
> I see those lines in /var/log/messages on the fast machine:
>
> carter ~ # grep dcc_job_summary /var/log/*
> grep: /var/log/mailman: No such file or directory
> /var/log/messages:Oct 17 09:09:31 carter distccd[16791]:
> (dcc_job_summary) client: 192.168.1.4:51319 COMPIL
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 15:55 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Michael Sullivan writes:
>
> > > It's all explained here : http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/distcc.xml
> >
> > I read the guide when I first set up distcc, but it didn't provide
> > enough detail for me to understand. I have two computers, a
Michael Sullivan writes:
> > It's all explained here : http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/distcc.xml
>
> I read the guide when I first set up distcc, but it didn't provide
> enough detail for me to understand. I have two computers, a slow one
> and a fast one. I would like the fast one to assist the
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 12:48 +0200, Matthias Krebs wrote:
> Am Freitag 16 Oktober 2009 20:34:17 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
> > On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 18:31 +0200, Matthias Krebs wrote:
> > > Am Freitag 16 Oktober 2009 15:23:20 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
> > > > I think I've set up distcc correctly, but
Am Freitag 16 Oktober 2009 20:34:17 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
> On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 18:31 +0200, Matthias Krebs wrote:
> > Am Freitag 16 Oktober 2009 15:23:20 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
> > > I think I've set up distcc correctly, but I keep seeing a whole bunch
> > > of messages like this:
> > > d
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 18:31 +0200, Matthias Krebs wrote:
> Am Freitag 16 Oktober 2009 15:23:20 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
> > I think I've set up distcc correctly, but I keep seeing a whole bunch of
> > messages like this:
> > distcc[24416] (dcc_writex) ERROR: failed to write: Connection reset by
>
Am Freitag 16 Oktober 2009 15:23:20 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
> I think I've set up distcc correctly, but I keep seeing a whole bunch of
> messages like this:
> distcc[24416] (dcc_writex) ERROR: failed to write: Connection reset by
> peer
>
> Is this normal? Is there anything I can do to prevent
I think I've set up distcc correctly, but I keep seeing a whole bunch of
messages like this:
distcc[24416] (dcc_writex) ERROR: failed to write: Connection reset by
peer
Is this normal? Is there anything I can do to prevent this from
happening?
-Michael Sullivan-
hi,
i am working on gentoo 2008 amd64, i set up my system to use distcc. i
enabled the distccd to log debug information, and monitored the
compiling process. and i have emerged some softwares with distcc. but
for some softwares, distcc will not compile them correctly. and i
always got "compile nul
thanks, i got it working now.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Al wrote:
> Xi Shen wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> this is the my 1st time working with distcc. after i have emerged and
>> configured the system (include the make.conf), i tried to emerge kde,
>> and use distmon-text to see what would happen
Xi Shen wrote:
> hi,
>
> this is the my 1st time working with distcc. after i have emerged and
> configured the system (include the make.conf), i tried to emerge kde,
> and use distmon-text to see what would happen. i lost the output of
> the distmon-text, but the output looks something like this
hi,
this is the my 1st time working with distcc. after i have emerged and
configured the system (include the make.conf), i tried to emerge kde,
and use distmon-text to see what would happen. i lost the output of
the distmon-text, but the output looks something like this:
somefile.namelocalhos
On Monday 03 November 2008 22:03:08 Daryl Styrk wrote:
> Markos Chandras wrote:
> > On Monday 03 November 2008 21:10:37 Daryl Styrk wrote:
> >> I thought I had everything set up correctly but apparently not.
> >>
> >> distccd[6820] (doc_execvp) ERROR: failed to exec x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
> >>
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Monday 03 November 2008 21:10:37 Daryl Styrk wrote:
>> I thought I had everything set up correctly but apparently not.
>>
>> distccd[6820] (doc_execvp) ERROR: failed to exec x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
>>
>> : No such file or di
On Monday 03 November 2008 21:10:37 Daryl Styrk wrote:
> I thought I had everything set up correctly but apparently not.
>
> distccd[6820] (doc_execvp) ERROR: failed to exec x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
>
> : No such file or directory
>
> distccd[1246] ERROR: compile args.c on 10.0.1.8 failed with exit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 14:10 -0500, Daryl Styrk wrote:
> I thought I had everything set up correctly but apparently not.
>
> distccd[6820] (doc_execvp) ERROR: failed to exec x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
> : No such file or director
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 14:10 -0500, Daryl Styrk wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I thought I had everything set up correctly but apparently not.
>
> distccd[6820] (doc_execvp) ERROR: failed to exec x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
> : No such file or directory
> distccd[1246] E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I thought I had everything set up correctly but apparently not.
distccd[6820] (doc_execvp) ERROR: failed to exec x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
: No such file or directory
distccd[1246] ERROR: compile args.c on 10.0.1.8 failed with exit code 110
make: *** [a
Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have scp all distcc config files to all hosts,
One possibility is that you forgot to edit each /etc/conf.d/distccd
file to _listen_ on its own IP address.
HTH,
Roger
Hi,
I've followed several docs about setting up distcc, one from the gentoo
manuals and the other on distcc's website. I believe I understand the whole
concept pretty well, but my problem is: only the first host compiles.
I have 3 hosts, if I use nmap, it can detect the distcc port is ope
Quoting deface <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_AMD64-x86-distcc
Thanks. Thanks. Thanks!!!
BTW, nice handbook. After 6 years, clean boot in the first try.
Gentoo's Docs rocks!
This message was sent using IM
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_AMD64-x86-distcc
On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 02:18 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> since Ubuntu Hardy didn't like my notebook, I'm currently installing
> Gentoo (amd64) on it. This is my first Gentoo install in almost six
> years!!
>
> So. I have two othe
Hello list,
since Ubuntu Hardy didn't like my notebook, I'm currently installing
Gentoo (amd64) on it. This is my first Gentoo install in almost six
years!!
So. I have two other boxes (Intel Core 2 Duo and AMD X2 3800+) that
also run Gentoo (x86) and I would like to use them as distcc hos
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:37:21 -0500
Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerry McBride wrote:
> >
> > I've identified a few packages that simply will not compile when
> > distcc is being used.
> >
> > Has anyone noticed problems with; ncurses, groff or libpcre?
> >
> > I'm thinking about modifying
all my systems running distcc are missing a few links to compilers in
the distcc directories. Seemed to vary across systems.
one was a link to cc (found when compiling ccze for instance) but it was
always one of the less common calls.
The fix was to create a symlink to the generic version.
Chec
Dan Farrell wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:26:26 -0400
> Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I've identified a few packages that simply will not compile when
>> distcc is being used.
>>
>> Has anyone noticed problems with; ncurses, groff or libpcre?
>>
>> I'm thinking about modifyin
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:26:26 -0400
Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I've identified a few packages that simply will not compile when
> distcc is being used.
>
> Has anyone noticed problems with; ncurses, groff or libpcre?
>
> I'm thinking about modifying /etc/portage/bashrc to d
Jerry McBride wrote:
>
> I've identified a few packages that simply will not compile when distcc
> is being used.
>
> Has anyone noticed problems with; ncurses, groff or libpcre?
>
> I'm thinking about modifying /etc/portage/bashrc to detect a new file
> named /etc/portage/package.distcc that w
I've identified a few packages that simply will not compile when distcc
is being used.
Has anyone noticed problems with; ncurses, groff or libpcre?
I'm thinking about modifying /etc/portage/bashrc to detect a new file
named /etc/portage/package.distcc that will turn off distcc for
each package
Hi,
if there is an gcc version problem icecream is your friend
there you dont have so big problems with different gcc versions
and it is easier to configure
2007/8/4, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Friday 03 August 2007 01:34:37 am Ric de France wrote:
> > There may be a got
On Friday 03 August 2007 01:34:37 am Ric de France wrote:
> There may be a gotcha of glibc (or other)
> incompatibilities / inconsistencies between Gentoo and Debian, but I'm
> sure others on this list can advise you better.
distcc only "farms out" the actual compiling. Pre-processing is done loc
Hi Kacper,
On 02/08/07, Kacper Goc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using Gentoo on my Dell Latitide D610 laptop. I also have root
> access to Dell PowerEdge 860 server with 2 Xeon processors running
> under Debian.
> Is there any way to configure portage/distcc to compile on server?
I'm guessing
I'm using Gentoo on my Dell Latitide D610 laptop. I also have root
access to Dell PowerEdge 860 server with 2 Xeon processors running
under Debian.
Is there any way to configure portage/distcc to compile on server?
Regards,
Kacper Goc
--
"Navigare necesse est, vivere non est necesse."
--
[EMAIL
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:15:25 -0400
PaulNM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Distcc seems to not be working properly on one or all of my 3
> systems. I have :
> Galactica 192.168.1.22 Pentium 2 (Problem system)
> Robotech 192.168.1.40 Pentium 3
> Optimus 192.168.1.80 AMD64 AthlonX2 (cro
Hi all,
Distcc seems to not be working properly on one or all of my 3 systems.
I have :
Galactica 192.168.1.22 Pentium 2 (Problem system)
Robotech 192.168.1.40 Pentium 3
Optimus 192.168.1.80 AMD64 AthlonX2 (crossdev setup)
All are Gentoo with distcc installed and configured. Optimus is solel
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
