On Thursday 27 Apr 2017 18:31:36 Dale wrote:
> I have it on a small post-it-note stuck on the side of my monitor. I'm
> not sure, may have been Neil or Alan, that posted it this way.
>
> Reboot Even If System Utterly Broken.
Another mnemonic:
B U S I E R
<=<=<=<=<=<
Of course, you're meant t
On Fr, 28 Apr 01:27:23 +0200
wabe wrote:
Floyd Anderson wrote:
On Do, 27 Apr 16:56:00 -0500
Dale wrote:
>One thing about alt sysreq, once you get to a certain point, you
>have >to go "all the way" with it. I've found that just the R and E
>generally >gets things back to a point it is accessi
wabe wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:56:00 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> One thing about alt sysreq, once you get to a certain point, you
>>> have to go "all the way" with it. I've found that just the R and E
>>> generally gets things back to a point it is accessible and I d
Floyd Anderson wrote:
> On Do, 27 Apr 16:56:00 -0500
> Dale wrote:
> >One thing about alt sysreq, once you get to a certain point, you
> >have >to go "all the way" with it. I've found that just the R and E
> >generally >gets things back to a point it is accessible and I don't
> >have to go >thro
On Do, 27 Apr 16:56:00 -0500
Dale wrote:
One thing about alt sysreq, once you get to a certain point, you have
to go "all the way" with it. I've found that just the R and E generally
gets things back to a point it is accessible and I don't have to go
through it all. I think once you get to the
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:56:00 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
> > One thing about alt sysreq, once you get to a certain point, you
> > have to go "all the way" with it. I've found that just the R and E
> > generally gets things back to a point it is accessible and I don't
> > have to
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:56:00 -0500, Dale wrote:
> One thing about alt sysreq, once you get to a certain point, you have to
> go "all the way" with it. I've found that just the R and E generally
> gets things back to a point it is accessible and I don't have to go
> through it all. I think once y
wabe wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>
>> wabe wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
>>> the new gcc5.
>>>
>>> I even cannot execute any command or start new programs. It is also
>>> not possible to open a terminal or to login on console.
>>>
>>> W
Dale wrote:
> wabe wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
> > the new gcc5.
> >
> > I even cannot execute any command or start new programs. It is also
> > not possible to open a terminal or to login on console.
> >
> > When I type somet
wabe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
> the new gcc5.
>
> I even cannot execute any command or start new programs. It is also
> not possible to open a terminal or to login on console.
>
> When I type something in an already opened Xterm it
Rasmus Thomsen wrote:
> Hi,
> "Invalid Machine command" (forgot the exact error message) usually
> happened to me when I passed the wrong -march to GCC (e.g.
> -march=haswell on sandybridge cpus)
I'm using -march native since many years. After restarting my machine
everything works fine again.
Hi,
"Invalid Machine command" (forgot the exact error message) usually happened to
me when I passed the wrong -march to GCC (e.g. -march=haswell on sandybridge
cpus)
Regards,
Rasmus
On 27 Apr 2017 7:43 pm, wabe wrote:
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> On April 27, 2017 7:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, wabe
>
I tried to reboot the system. But even this did not work. So I
toggled the power. The system booted without problems and it
seems that everything works well again.
I wonder what caused the trouble. The last package that was
compiled successfully was media-plugins/frei0r-plugins-1.5.0.
The next p
On Do, 27 Apr 19:43:46 +0200
wabe wrote:
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
On April 27, 2017 7:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, wabe
wrote:
On tty12 I can see messages […]
Try to switch to an other virtual terminal (with Ctrl+Alt+2) and start
from there.
But I cannot open another terminal. I don't even see what
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> On April 27, 2017 7:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, wabe
> wrote:
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
> >the new gcc5.
> >
> >I even cannot execute any command or start new programs. It is also
> >not possible to open a terminal o
Ian Bloss wrote:
> Try rebooting, worst thing you'll have to do if it doesn't want to
> reboot is boot a rescue image and mount it to repair it
I don't know how to repair it because I don't know what exactly is
broken. At the moment I can at least ask the M/L. I don't wanna lose
also this possi
On April 27, 2017 7:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, wabe wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
>the new gcc5.
>
>I even cannot execute any command or start new programs. It is also
>not possible to open a terminal or to login on console.
>
>When I type some
Try rebooting, worst thing you'll have to do if it doesn't want to reboot
is boot a rescue image and mount it to repair it
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017, 10:22 AM wabe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
> the new gcc5.
>
> I even cannot execute any
Hi folks,
it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
the new gcc5.
I even cannot execute any command or start new programs. It is also
not possible to open a terminal or to login on console.
When I type something in an already opened Xterm it says "Ungültiger
Maschine
19 matches
Mail list logo
