Alex Schuster writes:
> Harry Putnam writes:
>
>> Alex Schuster writes:
>> > After writing down some ideas about installing the old libraries
>> > somewhere in parallel, I just checked eix, and there is an extra
>> > slot for the 1.2 version. So, just emerge media-libs/libpng:1.2 ,
>> > and I'd
Harry Putnam writes:
> Alex Schuster writes:
> > After writing down some ideas about installing the old libraries
> > somewhere in parallel, I just checked eix, and there is an extra
> > slot for the 1.2 version. So, just emerge media-libs/libpng:1.2 ,
> > and I'd expect all to be fine then.
>
>
Alex Schuster writes:
> After writing down some ideas about installing the old libraries somewhere
> in parallel, I just checked eix, and there is an extra slot for the 1.2
> version. So, just emerge media-libs/libpng:1.2 , and I'd expect all to be
> fine then.
Doesn't seem to be the case her
On May 16, 2010, at 2:30 AM, Chris Walters wrote:
> On 5/15/2010 11:06 AM, Roy Wright wrote:
>> Argh. Just have to vent a little.
>>
>> So on to my list a applications to be installed. Firefox check, openoffice
>> check, handbrake...crap. Handbrake is one of the non-standard packages that
>
On 5/15/2010 11:06 AM, Roy Wright wrote:
> Argh. Just have to vent a little.
>
> Bring up a new install on a system whose system disk died and was replaced
> with an SSD. OS installed no problems. Recovered my RAID5 and LVM JBOD
> volume (a GIANT THANK YOU to the mdadm and lvm2 folks!). Then
Roy Wright writes:
> Argh. Just have to vent a little.
We feel with you :)
> So on to my list a applications to be installed. Firefox check,
> openoffice check, handbrake...crap. Handbrake is one of the
> non-standard packages that includes their own version of support
> libraries. You gues
Argh. Just have to vent a little.
Bring up a new install on a system whose system disk died and was replaced with
an SSD. OS installed no problems. Recovered my RAID5 and LVM JBOD volume (a
GIANT THANK YOU to the mdadm and lvm2 folks!). Then first "weekly" update hits
the libpng12 issue.
On Friday 14 May 2010 20:28:39 you wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:11:50 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 May 2010 11:15:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > This worked for me
> > >
> > > lafilefixer --justfixit
> > > emerge --oneshot --jobs 1 --keep-going $(qfile -qC $(find /usr/lib64
> > > \
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:11:50 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 May 2010 11:15:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > This worked for me
> >
> > lafilefixer --justfixit
> > emerge --oneshot --jobs 1 --keep-going $(qfile -qC $(find /usr/lib64
> > \ -name '*.la' | xargs grep -- -lpng12 | awk -F: '{print $
On Tue, 11 May 2010 16:46:50 -0700, walt wrote:
> Hey, what's a kde geek doing with gnome packages anyway :-p
GTK != GNOME :P
--
Neil Bothwick
Welcome to the world of Windows. Stay a while -- stay foooreveeer.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 11 May 2010 16:46:50 -0700, walt wrote:
> The gentoo dev who updated libpng said (in the bug report) that the .la
> files are causing the 'png12 not found' error, so I just 'fixed' all of
> them this way (basically Neil's way only different):
>
> #find /usr/lib/ -name \*.la -exec sed s/pn
On 05/11/2010 04:39 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 12:15:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:47:35 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I still have huge breakage with gnomecanvas and other things, meaning
that lots of gtk apps are broken right now for me.
This worked for m
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Rudmer van Dijk
wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 May 2010, Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
>> >> On Sunday 09 May 2010, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> >> > On Sonn
On Tuesday 11 May 2010, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>
> wrote:
> > On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> >> On Sunday 09 May 2010, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >> > On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> >> > > On Sunday 09 May
On Dienstag 11 Mai 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 May 2010 12:15:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:47:35 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > I still have huge breakage with gnomecanvas and other things, meaning
> > > that lots of gtk apps are broken right now for me.
> >
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
>> On Sunday 09 May 2010, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> > On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
>> > > On Sunday 09 May 2010, walt wrote:
>> > > > This looks to me like a major p
On Tue, 11 May 2010 13:39:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > You may need to run it more than once before it completes without
> > errors.
> Several times more than just once actually. At the end dev-
> python/gtksourceview-python just refused to build.
That's because it tries to emerge packa
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 11:15:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> This worked for me
>
> lafilefixer --justfixit
> emerge --oneshot --jobs 1 --keep-going $(qfile -qC $(find /usr/lib64
> \ -name '*.la' | xargs grep -- -lpng12 | awk -F: '{print $1}'))
>
> You may need to run it more than once before it compl
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:24 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I try to avoid emerge -e world because
>
> 1: It is time consuming.
> 2: It may still not work after all that time.
> 3: It is too much like the Gentoo equivalent of a reinstall and you
> are
>none the wiser as to why it fixed something
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 12:15:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:47:35 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I still have huge breakage with gnomecanvas and other things, meaning
> > that lots of gtk apps are broken right now for me.
>
> This worked for me
>
> lafilefixer --justfixit
> eme
On Tue, 11 May 2010 07:13:09 -0400, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> FWIW, revdep-rebuild worked without a hitch on one of my machines. On
> another, no combination of revdep-rebuild/lafilefixer would fix
> unresolved link dependencies. I ended up having to do an "emerge -e
> world". That finally fixed
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:19 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
[...]
>
> Please, see also the last comment on
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319061
> which seems to work.
Please cite the comment number. "Last comment" is not static.
FWIW, revdep-rebuild worked without a hitch on one of my
On 11 May, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:47:35 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> I still have huge breakage with gnomecanvas and other things, meaning
>> that lots of gtk apps are broken right now for me.
>
> This worked for me
>
> lafilefixer --justfixit
> emerge --oneshot --jobs
On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:47:35 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I still have huge breakage with gnomecanvas and other things, meaning
> that lots of gtk apps are broken right now for me.
This worked for me
lafilefixer --justfixit
emerge --oneshot --jobs 1 --keep-going $(qfile -qC $(find /usr/lib64 \
On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:47:35 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On the other hand, nothing KDE4 seems affected, it's mainly
> > GTK/glade/pango/cairo stuff that's affected, so you would probably get
> > away with it on a pure KDE4 box.
>
> I had to rebuild qt-gui, kdelibs, ksplash and a few other
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 10:39:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 06:51:39 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > Shall I wait to update my box until a safe way through all this is
> > established? I can't afford to break things right now.
>
> Yes. While I updated my netbook successfully, there are stil
On Tue, 11 May 2010 06:51:39 +0100, Mick wrote:
> Shall I wait to update my box until a safe way through all this is
> established? I can't afford to break things right now.
Yes. While I updated my netbook successfully, there are still a number of
packages that won't rebuild on my desktop. Some
On Monday 10 May 2010 23:27:12 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 May 2010, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 09 May 2010, walt wrote:
> > > > > This looks to me like a major
On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> On Sunday 09 May 2010, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> > > On Sunday 09 May 2010, walt wrote:
> > > > This looks to me like a major portage screwup. I see that on my
> > > > ~amd64 machine I have both
On Sun, 09 May 2010 18:11:06 -0700, walt wrote:
> This worked very well for a few months, and then those suggestions
> suddenly stopped coming.
>
> Since then, emerge @preserved-rebuild (or @preserved-libs) says this:
>
> #emerge @preserved-rebuild
> !!! '@preserved-rebuild' is not a valid packa
walt wrote:
On 05/09/2010 11:54 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
and walt:
preserved libs. Look into it.
A long time ago, maybe one or two years ago, an occasional package
would suggest that I should run emerge @preserved-rebuild to rebuild
packages that are linked to obsolete libraries.
This
On 05/09/2010 11:54 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
and walt:
preserved libs. Look into it.
A long time ago, maybe one or two years ago, an occasional package
would suggest that I should run emerge @preserved-rebuild to rebuild
packages that are linked to obsolete libraries.
This worked very
On Sunday 09 May 2010, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 May 2010, walt wrote:
> > > This looks to me like a major portage screwup. I see that on my ~amd64
> > > machine I have both versions of libpng, but the 1.2.43-r1 doesn't
> > > inst
On 05/09/2010 10:37 AM, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
On Sunday 09 May 2010, walt wrote:
This looks to me like a major portage screwup. I see that on my ~amd64
machine I have both versions of libpng, but the 1.2.43-r1 doesn't install
a pkg-config file because 1.4.2 installs one with the same name, an
On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> On Sunday 09 May 2010, walt wrote:
> > This looks to me like a major portage screwup. I see that on my ~amd64
> > machine I have both versions of libpng, but the 1.2.43-r1 doesn't install
> > a pkg-config file because 1.4.2 installs one with the sam
On Sunday 09 May 2010, walt wrote:
>
> This looks to me like a major portage screwup. I see that on my ~amd64
> machine I have both versions of libpng, but the 1.2.43-r1 doesn't install
> a pkg-config file because 1.4.2 installs one with the same name, and just
> as bad, version 1.2.43-r1 removed
On 05/09/2010 06:41 AM, Xi Shen wrote:
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 9:32 PM, walt wrote:
On 05/09/2010 05:10 AM, Xi Shen wrote:
hi,
my system is gentoo amd64, kde 4.3. i just updated my portage, and
updated the world. then i ran revdep-rebuild, and i got a error when
building "notification-daemon-
On 05/09/2010 09:32 AM, walt wrote:
> On 05/09/2010 05:10 AM, Xi Shen wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> my system is gentoo amd64, kde 4.3. i just updated my portage, and
>> updated the world. then i ran revdep-rebuild, and i got a error when
>> building "notification-daemon-0.4.0-r1". the error found in the bui
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 9:32 PM, walt wrote:
> On 05/09/2010 05:10 AM, Xi Shen wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> my system is gentoo amd64, kde 4.3. i just updated my portage, and
>> updated the world. then i ran revdep-rebuild, and i got a error when
>> building "notification-daemon-0.4.0-r1". the error foun
On 05/09/2010 05:10 AM, Xi Shen wrote:
hi,
my system is gentoo amd64, kde 4.3. i just updated my portage, and
updated the world. then i ran revdep-rebuild, and i got a error when
building "notification-daemon-0.4.0-r1". the error found in the build
log is: cannot find -lpng12
i have both libpng
40 matches
Mail list logo
