please read the news it's a must. If your network card drivers are
built as modules ''in theory'' you are not effected. If they are built
into the kernel, you will have to delete a 70- something file, and
replace it with an 80- something empty file, to keep the same ethN
wlanN names. Sorry, i do no
Anyone using Hadoop for managing virtual machines and/or drives.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
Hello Norman,
Sorry for the delayed response
>> What do you mean by replication?
Oh I was referring to the replication of the entire NFS server with virtual
drive images etc.. to other machines for fail over, maybe load balancing.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
Hello Norman,
Thank you so much for your response, and that is an interesting setup.
>> we open up pools of up to 20 hosts which all mount the same NFS
>> share which holds sparse file images as virtual hdds of the
>> VM.
How are these sprase file images initially built for each VM's virtual hdd
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Old cynic speaking here:
>
> Yes, they both have the same weak point: humans.
>
> In my experience the only storage technology that ever let me down badly
> was a decrepit Arena locally-attached badly designed POS.
>
> The humans that *run*
>
> Hello,
>
> I tend to disagree. A correctly designed SAN (using dual Fabric among
> other things) is a lot more stable and has a lot better performance than
> any NAS (NFS, CIFS, iSCSI) solution. One other thing that also needs to
> be correctly configured to have a stable SAN infrastructure is
>
> Hello Nick,
>
> the question is, what are you doing with it and why do you think you
> need a fibre channel SAN.
> Our goal indeed is to get rid of the SAN infrastructure as it is
> delicately to all kinds of failure with nearly zero fault tolerance.
> An example, you have an hicup or a power f
Hello Everyone,
Was wondering what people are running these days, and how do they compare
to the 10,000 dollar SAN boxes. We are looking to build a fiber san using
IET and glusterFS, and was wondering what kind of luck people where having
using this approach, or any for that matter.
Kind Regards,
And who says you can't teach an old man new tricks huh geezer ;)?
Thank you so much for your response!!! That sorts out outgoing
traffic, have you had to setup rules for incoming traffic? I mean
from the outside world to a server for example?
Kind Regards,
Nick.
By downstream, I mean within our own network. Obviously downstream LB
from the ISP's DSLAM would be impossible without MLPP, BGP support...
N
Sorry for the top post.
N.
, maybe the session would suffice (i.e,
per network session)?
Although per packet would be preferred.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
On 5/26/13, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 26 May 2013 22:35:14 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> > On 25 May 2013, at 22:26, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> >> ... As mentioned
Any different if the links are VDSL? I have little experience in
working with DSL based connections, and was wondering what was
possible in terms or bridging/bonding etc.. if anything.
N.
On 5/25/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> I missed out some crusial info in my last email. As mentioned this
>
, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am looking to put together a linux router for small business, and
> was wondering if there was anything the suite (using quagga etc..)
> that would allow for load balancing of regular dsl links. Kind of like
> cisco with fast ethernet
Hello everyone,
I am looking to put together a linux router for small business, and
was wondering if there was anything the suite (using quagga etc..)
that would allow for load balancing of regular dsl links. Kind of like
cisco with fast ethernet 0,1 and ip sef. If outgoing and incoming
traffic co
Neal,
As for the --sport flag for OUTPUT, should it not be left arbitrary?
The SSH daemon should use unprivileged ports between 1024 and 65535.
The only daemon I know thus far that does not is NTP which is
hardwired to 123 both ways.
Thanks Guys,
Nick.
Hello Everyone,
Thank you so much for your responses. I agree Alan, total pain in the
neck!!! But it's a ticket that was passed down to me. We moved the
stateful firewalls inside the network, broken down to each department.
But as a first on site defense on our BGP router running Quagga, we
only
On 5/21/13, Neal Murphy wrote:
> You still aren't accepting *each* direction. Either accept each direction
> with
> explicit rules or rewrite the rules so they apply to both directions at
> once.
> The former is probably easier to understand months later, even though it is
>
> more verbose.
>
> Me
>> Looks like the packet never gets to the tcp chain. what is --syn?
It seems that way I am not sure what --syn is actually. But even
if I comment it out it does not work. Also, for testing I changed the
SSH rule to allow bidirectional traffic until this is fixed:
-A TCP -p tcp -m tcp --dport
For testing purposes I changed the ssh rule to:
-A TCP -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
-A TCP -p tcp -m tcp -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d 192.168.2.5 --dport 22 -j DROP
And still no go. As mentioned before, everything works fine until I
try to close up the rest of the ports not opened up in the chains
"UDP"
Hello Everyone,
We recently moved our stateful firewall inside, and would like to
strip down the firewall at our router connected to the outside world.
The problem I am experiencing is getting things to work properly
without connection tracking. I hope I am not in breach of mailing list
rules howe
Please forgive me! Gmail client from hell!
I just realized that we were running 3.5.7 on the older systems, and
the current version is 3.7.10. Would I be cutting too many corners to
copy over the ..config from the older machine.
Thanks in Advance,
Nick.
On 5/12/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Thank you!!!
>
> On 5/12/13, staticsa
Thank you!!!
On 5/12/13, staticsafe wrote:
> On 5/11/2013 20:39, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Just running an installation on another IBM machine, and wanted to know
>> which kernel config files can we copy over from one machine to another,
>> an
Thanks yet again Michael! Enjoy your weekend.
N.
On 5/11/13, Michael Mol wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 03:13 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Our service provider requires all connections between us be done
>> through IPSec IKE. From the little bit of resear
Hello Everyone,
Just running an installation on another IBM machine, and wanted to know
which kernel config files can we copy over from one machine to another,
and have the same exact modules etc copied over.
Saw examples for genkern, but we build our own kernels. After copying the
files over we l
Hello Everyone,
Our service provider requires all connections between us be done
through IPSec IKE. From the little bit of research, I found that this
is achieved using a system with IPSec kernel modules enabled, along
with cryptography modules. On the application level, I saw ipsec tool,
OpenSWAN
Hello Andrea,
Thank you so much for your time. I missed the part about log^2 in the
documentation.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
On 5/10/13, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On May 10, 2013 5:23 PM, "Andrea Conti" wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> > server tick.nrc.ca minpoll 64 maxpoll 1024 iburst prefer
>>
>> Ouch! mi
Hello Andrea,
Thank you so much for your response! I was reluctant to include
configuration related material for the sake of not insulting anyone
however, on the server we have set:
server tick.nrc.ca minpoll 64 maxpoll 1024 iburst prefer
server tock.nrc.ca minpoll 64 maxpoll 1024 iburst
restri
Hello Everyone,
A while back I was inquiring about the best way to have computers on
the network synched. Long story short, we opted to go with an NTP
server installed on one machine, and synching the rest of the machines
against it.
However, I am not sure if the NTP server is properly synched wi
On 5/4/13, the guard wrote:
>
>
>
> Суббота, 4 мая 2013, 12:41 -04:00 от Nick Khamis :
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> While trying to include a logging chain to our IPTables rules, I am
>> receiving the following
>> error: (iptables: No chain/target/matc
We are using 3.3.8. I did see those in the kernel list. Anyone have
any idea which
ones are needed?
Thanks in Advance,
N.
On 5/4/13, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-05-04 12:41 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Some searching caused me to make sure that I have the correct modules
>> loaded:
Hello Everyone,
While trying to include a logging chain to our IPTables rules, I am
receiving the following
error: (iptables: No chain/target/match by that name.
The chain looks like:
# Set Log Limit
LOGLIMIT="2/s"
LOGLIMITBURST="10"
$IPTABLES -N LOGDROP
#echo -e " - Logging Dropped Traf
On 4/26/13, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 26/04/2013 19:11, Nick Khamis wrote:
>>>> >> Thank you so much for your response, and I totally understand the
>>>> >> effort vs. benefit challenge. However, is it really that much
>>>> >> trouble/uns
On 4/26/13, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 26/04/2013 17:54, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> On 4/26/13, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 26/04/2013 17:27, Nick Khamis wrote:
>>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the many solutions however, I am totally
On 4/26/13, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 26/04/2013 17:27, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Thank you for the many solutions however, I am totally lost as to which
>> would
>> be most reliable in a collocation setting vs. office desktop. What we
>>
On 4/26/13, Jarry wrote:
> On 26-Apr-13 16:10, Joseph wrote:
>> On 04/25/13 10:33, Nick Khamis wrote:
>>>
>>> We are trying to sync our server's time with an accurate ntp
>>> server, and was wondering which of the many solutions are
>>> con
> Ummm... *all* servers are critically time-sensitive.
>
Yeah... I concur ;)
On 4/25/13, Michael Mol wrote:
> On 04/25/2013 10:33 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> We are trying to sync our server's time with an accurate ntp
>> server, and was wondering which of the many solutions are
>> considered viable. I did see
Hello Everyone,
We are trying to sync our server's time with an accurate ntp
server, and was wondering which of the many solutions are
considered viable. I did see the
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Time_Synchronization.
Our services are quite time sensitive.
Thanks in Advance,
N.
Who's paying for this bandwith?
N.
On 4/24/13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:07:05 +0100, Stroller wrote:
>
>> > That only works on small systems. I have systems here where a 'du' on
>> > /home would take hours and produce massive IO wait, because there's so
>> > much data in the
Oooops, I meant option 3.1:
3.1 Create a new empty file:
touch /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules
and reboot. The kernel will rename the interfaces hopefully as they were
before.
N.
On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> I went into the kernel, rebuilt it with no changes (network driver
still eth0...
N.
On 4/7/13, Michael Hampicke wrote:
> Am 07.04.2013 20:08, schrieb Nick Khamis:
>> For those that have an error compiling udev 200:
>>
>> # emerge -1 XML-Parser
>> # perl-cleaner --all
>>
>> There was not mention of this in the news. No
For those that have an error compiling udev 200:
# emerge -1 XML-Parser
# perl-cleaner --all
There was not mention of this in the news. Nor will the package pull
them in as a
dependency.
N.
On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Is changing it back to eth0 and eth1 like pulling teeth?
>
> N
Is changing it back to eth0 and eth1 like pulling teeth?
N
On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Ooops I should have been more specific the net cards are not esp5s0
> and esp6s0. And the drivers for the network cards are built as
> modules.
>
> N
>
> On 4/7/13, Tanstaafl wr
Ooops I should have been more specific the net cards are not esp5s0
and esp6s0. And the drivers for the network cards are built as
modules.
N
On 4/7/13, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-04-07 1:48 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> I just did got udev updated. Did all the steps in the news
:32, schrieb Nick Khamis:
>> No... I'm stumped. I really don't want it in there either... I will
>> attempt removing it once finished updating the system.
>>
>> N.
>>
>> On 4/7/13, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> Are you using 802.1x or wireless on that ma
/7/13, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-04-07 9:38 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Double checking the udevd version we are running 171. Not sure if we
>> should be effected yet? I confess, I did a world upgrade and walked
>> away.
>
> Well, hopefully you learned a valuable le
On 4/7/13, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 07 Apr 2013 17:00:24 Nick Khamis wrote:
>> >> You should do udev first, that way if it breaks you have the maximum
>> >> amount of time to get things working again. Not that I'm a
>> >> pessimist...
>> >&g
your help.
N.
On 4/7/13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 10:20:02 -0400, Nick Khamis wrote:
>
>> I am upgrading each package (25) one by one, and leaving the meat and
>> potatoes (udev) for last. I am really sorry about the noise guys and
>> gals. It's be
outside of it being a hard dependency of some
> other package.
>
> On 04/07/2013 10:22 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Installing wpa_supplicant got the network scripts working again. Not
>> sure why. Does anyone know why we need wpa_supplication now?
>>
>> On 4/7/13, Nick Kha
Installing wpa_supplicant got the network scripts working again. Not
sure why. Does anyone know why we need wpa_supplication now?
On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> I am upgrading each package (25) one by one, and leaving the meat and
> potatoes (udev) for last. I am really sorry abo
LDAP server.
N.
On 4/7/13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 09:38:23 -0400, Nick Khamis wrote:
>
>> Double checking the udevd version we are running 171. Not sure if we
>> should be effected yet? I confess, I did a world upgrade and walked
>> away. For some reason i
nt
>> $interface_name". If they're supposed to be statically configured, try
>> using ifconfig to configure them manually.
Now that I have internet connection, I am not sure what my line of
action should be.
N.
On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Double checking the ud
Double checking the udevd version we are running 171. Not sure if we
should be effected yet? I confess, I did a world upgrade and walked
away. For some reason it was stuck on ipr.h for some apache related
package, which was odd since apache is not installed on the machine.
I reset the system and po
t; udev's renaming entirely via the kernel command-line parameter? Because
> you've done some magic in /etc/udev/rules.d/?
>
> If the former, then OK, this is a different issue. If the latter, be
> aware that this isn't a supported configuration! You may very well have
&g
Can't do nothing right now, no network connection... Don't feel like
burning a livecd and chrooting to jail...
N.
On 4/6/13, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:35:22 -0400
> Nick Khamis wrote:
>> As for /sbin/ip. I have no such command.
>
> I'd
in multicast addresses, not unicast addresses. I presume you're
> trying to get your unicast addresses working properly.
>
> ifconfig -a
>
> On 04/06/2013 10:35 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Sorry I did mean /sbin/ip... Long day. Regardless, /sbin/ipmaddr does
>> now sho
inet6 ff02:1
>> 4: eth1
>> link 33:33:00:00:00:01
>> inet6 ff02:1
>>
>> Too much inte6 for my liking... Did I somehow get rid of ipv4?
>>
>> N.
>>
>> On 4/6/13, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> On 04/06/2013 08:53 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
&
Mol wrote:
> On 04/06/2013 08:53 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> I took a closer look at /etc/udev/70-something-rules-net and
>> /sys/class/net/eth0/ and all the ATTR (i.e., address, type, dev_id)
>> line up fine. I did not find a "name" file in /sys/class/net/eth0
>&
The problem with eudev is that we are using the hardened profile and not sure
if it is part of our source tree. Right now, I just would like to
pinpoint this stubborn
little issue
I just wanted to mention that name did not change. ifconfig eth0 still pulls up
the interface, and same for ifconf
fig eth0/1 and lo returns the interface
with no tx and rx traffic. And no ip address as set in conf.d/net.
Please help guys. Server room is numbing..
N.
On 4/6/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> In attempted to delete 70-something rules from /etc/udev/rules.d/ and
> it was recreated on bo
In attempted to delete 70-something rules from /etc/udev/rules.d/ and
it was recreated on boot with the same content. I don't think the
device got renamed since "ifconfig eth0" shows the correct info.
Your help is greatly appreciated,
N.
On 4/6/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Well I
13, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am 06.04.2013 23:19, schrieb Nick Khamis:
>> Our net card was also build as a module Volker, did you include
>> your net driver for example in /etc/conf.d/modules?
>
> no
> I removed the 70-something rules, and did pretty much nothing els
Our net card was also build as a module Volker, did you include
your net driver for example in /etc/conf.d/modules?
N.
On 4/6/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Oh dear what did I start!@!@! I'm sorry, I did not know this was a
> machine brewing. Don't follow the mailing list a
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
>> Am 06.04.2013 21:33, schrieb Mick:
>>> On Saturday 06 Apr 2013 20:03:15 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>>> Am 06.04.2013 17:57, schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
>>>>> Hi, Nick.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 06
After updating our systems we lost network connectivity to the
servers. When trying to start net.eth0 we got the following message:
/ib64/rc/net/wpa_supplicant.sh: line 68: _is wireless command not found
/etc/init.d/net.eth0: line 548: _exists command not found
Errror: Interface eth0 does not exi
Hello Everyone,
On our test machines we are using and EOL Myrinet fibercahnnel card:
01:05.0 Network controller: MYRICOM Inc. Myrinet 2000 Scalable Cluster
Interconnect (rev 03)
The problem is that their open source driver only supports up to 2.6
kernels. And with us running gentoo 3.x kernel h
Yeah these guys seem to think that our servers MUST run on the
hardened profile...
On 3/28/13, Dale wrote:
> Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hahahah udev hell!! I did go through that updating from 2.6 to 3.4.
>> That was quite an experience But for kernel 3.* has udev not been
>&
As mentioned earlier a temporary change of profile got me on my way
eselect profile set 0
env-update
eselect profile set 7
Moving forward... Thanks guys.
On 3/28/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> But we never changed our profile? Always running hardened server.
>
> N.
>
> On 3/28/13, Nic
But we never changed our profile? Always running hardened server.
N.
On 3/28/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> I switched to the default profile from hardened:
>
> eselect profile list
> Available profile symlink targets:
> [1] default/linux/x86/13.0 *
>
> env-update
> !!!
/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/13.0/eapi'
>>> Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache...
And still can't update portage.
N.
On 3/28/13, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 01:43 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> First hickup
>>
>> emerge -puDN1 world
>> !!!
!!! configuration, you should revert back to the previous configuration.
!!! Allowed actions are limited to --help, --info, --search, --sync, and
We were always running hardened. Never changed the profile.
N.
On 3/28/13, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 01:16 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>&g
So basically, no long weekend for me here in Canada. Thanks a lot guys
for your time.Wish me luck. Happy easter/holidays!!!
N.
On 3/28/13, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 12:56 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hahahah udev hell!! I did go through that updating from 2.6 to 3.4.
&g
AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Just got a ticket assigned to me where we need to update our production
>> servers.
>>
>> uname -a
>> Linux noun 3.4.9-gentoo #2 SMP Sat Oct 13 09:35:07 EDT 2012 x86_64
>> Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz Gen
flags included.
Thanks again,
Nick.
On 3/28/13, Joshua Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Just got a ticket assigned to me where we need to update our production
>> servers.
>>
>> uname -a
>&
Hello Everyone,
Just got a ticket assigned to me where we need to update our production servers.
uname -a
Linux noun 3.4.9-gentoo #2 SMP Sat Oct 13 09:35:07 EDT 2012 x86_64
Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
eselect
[18] hardened/linux/amd64 *
I don't think they have been upd
Someone watched some news regarding HP moving towards ARM ;)
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_19240331
Nick.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:07 PM, James wrote:
> So Sorry,
>
> I just think that in a few years, Gentoo will be more
> about ARM( 64 or 128 bit) than Intel...
>
> Check out the clust
cd /usr/src/linux
make menuconfig "select the list of modules/drivers you need for your box"
make modules_install
cp arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/kernel-2.6.3.
vi /boot/grub/grub.conf "nano if you have not used vi before"
title Gentoo Linux 2.6.36-r1
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/kernel-2.6.36-native
Hello Everyone,
I have a problem compiling Heartbeat, the error is:
glib-2.0.so ../replace/.libs/libreplace.a -lbz2 -lz -lc -luuid -lrt
/usr/lib/libltdl.so -ldl
creating cl_respawn
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/Heartbeat-3-0-STABLE-3.0.4/tools'
Making all in doc
gmake[1]: Entering d
Hey Guys,
Thank you for your posts, I will keep working on Gentoo + UltraMonkey 3. I
use it on Debian it is very useful. Will keep those of you whom are
interested posted.
Regards,
Ninus.
Hey Mike,
Thanks a lot sir... Much appreciated.
Regards,
Ninus.
So no Ultramonkey 3 on Gentoo? Anyone?
Hello Everyone,
Does anyone have any experience building Ultramonley 3 on Gentoo. I
downloaded ultramonkey 3 from here "
http://www.ultramonkey.org/download/3/source/ultramonkey-3-1um.1.tar.gz";. It
is in the source folder but Is see no source. I understand how this could be
an ultramonkey questio
at 11:33 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann <
volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Montag 28 September 2009, Nick Khamis wrote:
> > Hello Everyone I am new to gentoo, usually I use Debian. I have a fresh
> > install x86 2.6.30 kernel and I was trying to get Ultramonkey going on
>
Hello Everyone I am new to gentoo, usually I use Debian. I have a fresh
install x86 2.6.30 kernel and I was trying to get Ultramonkey going on the
box. I looking for the equivilant to the following deb packages for Gentoo
please
* libdbi-perl
* libdbd-mysql-perl
* libmysqlclient14-dev
If you feel
Hey Xavier,
I do appologize for the two messages, it will not happen again. When issuing
a "find /lib/modules/`uname -r` -name ip_vs*.ko" I see only
"/lib/modules/2.6.30-gentoo- r6/kernel/net/netfilter/ip_vs.ko"
I do not see the rest
#lvs
ip_vs
ip_vs_rr
ip_vs_wrr
ip_vs_lc
ip_vs_wlc
ip_vs_lblc
i
Hey Walt,
I build the kernel via:
make menuconfig
make
make modules_install
cp arch/... /boot/...
I did issue a depmod and still just:
/lib/modules/2.6.30-gentoo-r6/kernel/net/netfilter/ip_vs.ko"
when issuing a "find /lib/modules/`uname -r` -name ip_vs*.ko"
Thanks in Adnvanced,
Ninus
Hey Albert,
When issuing a "find /lib/modules/`uname -r` -name ip_vs*.ko" I see only
"/lib/modules/2.6.30-gentoo-r6/kernel/net/netfilter/ip_vs.ko"
I do not see the rest
#lvs
ip_vs
ip_vs_rr
ip_vs_wrr
ip_vs_lc
ip_vs_wlc
ip_vs_lblc
ip_vs_lblcr
ip_vs_dh
ip_vs_sh
ip_vs_sed
ip_vs_nq
ip_vs_ftp
Thanks
Hello everyone I am having problems with using LVS in Gentoo, I needed the
following modules built into the kernel:
ip_vs
ip_vs_rr
ip_vs_wrr
ip_vs_lc
ip_vs_wlc
ip_vs_lblc
ip_vs_lblcr
ip_vs_dh
ip_vs_sh
ip_vs_sed
ip_vs_nq
ip_vs_ftp
How I recompile the kernel is select the module that I need
IP vi
How I recompile the kernel is select the module that I need
IP virtual server support
>> -> [*] TCP load balancing
>> -> [*] UDP load balancing
>>
> then do a make followed by a make modules_install.
ip_vs is in my list of modules (the only ip_vs*) and does not return an
I have included in my kenrel configuration the following:
IP virtual server support
-> [*] TCP load balancing
-> [*] UDP load balancing
I have added to /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6 the follwing
#lvs
ip_vs
ip_vs_rr
ip_vs_wrr
ip_vs_lc
ip_vs_wlc
ip_vs_lblc
ip_vs_lblcr
1) Security is for exploiting
2) If they are well versed on the drivers that virtualization technologies
use, then yes they can tell they are on a virtual machine and not on
dedicated server.
3) You can bridge network connection "physically on the network" minus the
nic of course
4) Virtualization
Hello Everyone,
I am using my laptop to test virtualization before setting it up on the
servers. I am familiar with vmware but since I am unable to get vmwre-server
going on kernel 2.6.3r5, I am using virtualbox. My question is in terms of
the "HardDisk" setting. The host has SATA hdd and I do not
Hey Neil,
I tried to compile virtualbox using intructions here "
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/VirtualBox";. And it was unsuccesful, I have
attached the build.log
Regards,
Ninus.
build.log
Description: Binary data
Do any of the emulators work with 2.6.30r5 kernel? I am not bound to only
vmware, what about XEN, VirtualBox etc...
Thanks In Advnaced,
Ninus.
Hey Walt,
Thank you for your response, I know that there is a number of patches out
there but I just want to know which one to use. Surely someone has
vmware-server 2 or XEN, or Virtual box running off of the 2.6.30-r5 kenrel.
I know that I can uise layman and emerge vmware-server 2 the problem wi
Hello Group,
I do not meean to be persistent regarding this problem but I am unable to
emerge vmware-server or xen. the error I am experioencing is attached at a
the build.log.
Environment: x86, 2.6.30-r5
Your Help is Greatly Appreciated,
Ninus
build.log
Description: Binary data
Hey Guys,
I really apperciate your help but as it sits I am unable to compile
vmware-server 1.x or XEN. I have attached the build log. Basically I know I
can larman the new version of vmware-server2 but I heard it is a clunker. I
really need to get virtual servers up on the server before I get fir
Hello Everyone,
I have been at this for a week, and I am stumped. Trying to emerge
vmware-server 1.0.9 using x86 environment and 2.6.30 kernel. I gave up on
amd64 earlier this week please help. Attached is the build.log
Thanks In Advanced!
Ninus.
build.log
Description: Binary data
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
