>> You should do udev first, that way if it breaks you have the maximum >> amount of time to get things working again. Not that I'm a pessimist...
>> PS Please don't top-post, it is frowned upon on this list. Makes sense and I apologize for the top posts. Have everything up to date with udev in the crosshairs. That being said: 1) Network drivers are compiled as modules 2) I deleted the contents of /etc/udev/rules.d (i.e, 70-something....) 3) Removed udev-postmount from runlevels. That should be sufficient to hold onto the old names eth0/1....? Thanks for all your help. N. On 4/7/13, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 10:20:02 -0400, Nick Khamis wrote: > >> I am upgrading each package (25) one by one, and leaving the meat and >> potatoes (udev) for last. I am really sorry about the noise guys and >> gals. It's been a while since I had such a scare.... > > You should do udev first, that way if it breaks you have the maximum > amount of time to get things working again. Not that I'm a pessimist... > > PS Please don't top-post, it is frowned upon on this list. > > > -- > Neil Bothwick > > the sum of all human intelligence is constant, only the number of humans > increases. >
