On 05/22 09:06, Adam Carter wrote:
> It happens again.
>
> >
> > Linux kernel 4.11.0 (fetched from ftp.kernel.org mirror)
> >
> > dmesg:
> > [ 3879.147626] encfs[4099]: segfault at 0 ip 0044ca52 sp
> > 7fb17d8d2990 error 4 in encfs[40+95000]
> >
> > Nothing more than this in the dm
On 2017-05-20 16:36, Mick wrote:
> It seems revdep-rebuild'ing against library='libQtCore.so.4' also
> rebuilds the newly installed Qt packages. This is why there so many
> packages to rebuild.
For me it was just 20 packages, I have no KDE. That was much fewer that
Kai's suggestion would have d
> > [0.991863] iommu: Adding device :06:00.0 to group 12
> > [0.991982] iommu: Adding device :07:04.0 to group 12
> > [1.063849] AMD-Vi: Found IOMMU at :00:00.2 cap 0x40
> > [1.063962] AMD-Vi: Interrupt remapping enabled
> > [1.064145] AMD-Vi: Lazy IO/TLB flushing
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 4:37 PM, wrote:
> I've a spreadsheet file (ODS) with several sheets in it but when I try
> to open it, it take long time to load
>
> When I try to open it with Gnumeric I get a warning:
>
> General ODF error
> Unable to parse
> '((#REF!;#REF!)))
It happens again.
>
> Linux kernel 4.11.0 (fetched from ftp.kernel.org mirror)
>
> dmesg:
> [ 3879.147626] encfs[4099]: segfault at 0 ip 0044ca52 sp
> 7fb17d8d2990 error 4 in encfs[40+95000]
>
> Nothing more than this in the dmesg, though.
>
Ok so its crashed. Have you tried rebui
On Sun, 21 May 2017 18:50:50 +0200, Simon Thelen wrote:
> On 17-05-21 at 08:41, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > On 2017-05-21 09:51, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > Why are you using encfs with the associated FUSE baggage when
> > > ecryptfs is in the kernel and performs the same function?
> > Is ecryptfs
On 2017-05-21 10:01, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-05-21 17:59, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> > cryptsetup seems to be of another flavor than encfs, since its depends
> > on gpg (see below), which encfs does not use as far as I know.
> > I think encfs uses symmetric ciphers and cryptsetup uses a pu
On 2017-05-21 17:59, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> cryptsetup seems to be of another flavor than encfs, since its depends
> on gpg (see below), which encfs does not use as far as I know.
> I think encfs uses symmetric ciphers and cryptsetup uses a pub/private
> key pair. But I am by no means a cryptolo
On 17-05-21 at 08:41, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-05-21 09:51, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > Why are you using encfs with the associated FUSE baggage when ecryptfs
> > is in the kernel and performs the same function?
> Is ecryptfs behind the scenes when I run /sbin/cryptsetup ?
No, ecryptfs is a stac
On 05/21 08:41, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-05-21 09:51, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> > Why are you using encfs with the associated FUSE baggage when ecryptfs
> > is in the kernel and performs the same function?
>
> Is ecryptfs behind the scenes when I run /sbin/cryptsetup ?
>
> I remember a few
On 2017-05-21 09:51, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Why are you using encfs with the associated FUSE baggage when ecryptfs
> is in the kernel and performs the same function?
Is ecryptfs behind the scenes when I run /sbin/cryptsetup ?
I remember a few years back, still on debian, I resolved to replace my
Am Sun, 21 May 2017 09:38:31 +0100
schrieb Peter Humphrey :
> On Saturday 20 May 2017 18:39:07 Kai Krakow wrote:
> > Am Sat, 20 May 2017 16:36:08 +0100
> >
> > schrieb Mick :
> > > On Saturday 20 May 2017 10:48:52 Mick wrote:
> [...]
> [...]
> > > [...]
> > > [...]
> > > [...]
> > >
On 05/21 09:51, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 21 May 2017 10:17:32 +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> > Linux kernel 4.11.0 (fetched from ftp.kernel.org mirror)
> >
> > dmesg:
> > [ 3879.147626] encfs[4099]: segfault at 0 ip 0044ca52 sp
> > 7fb17d8d2990 error 4 in encfs[40+95000]
On Sun, 21 May 2017 10:17:32 +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Linux kernel 4.11.0 (fetched from ftp.kernel.org mirror)
>
> dmesg:
> [ 3879.147626] encfs[4099]: segfault at 0 ip 0044ca52 sp
> 7fb17d8d2990 error 4 in encfs[40+95000]
>
> Nothing more than this in the dmesg, though.
On Saturday 20 May 2017 18:39:07 Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Sat, 20 May 2017 16:36:08 +0100
>
> schrieb Mick :
> > On Saturday 20 May 2017 10:48:52 Mick wrote:
> > > On Saturday 20 May 2017 03:19:20 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 20 May 2017 00:26:58 Kai Krakow wrote:
> > [...]
> > [...]
On 05/21 08:46, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> On 05/21 08:41, Kai Krakow wrote:
> > Am Sun, 21 May 2017 08:15:57 +0200
> > schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
> >
> > > I have a directory mounted via fuse.encfs (encrypted).
> > >
> > > Since kernel 4.11 (seldom, more often with 4.11.1 and 4.11.2) it
> > > happen
16 matches
Mail list logo
