On 2017-05-21 09:51, Neil Bothwick wrote: > Why are you using encfs with the associated FUSE baggage when ecryptfs > is in the kernel and performs the same function?
Is ecryptfs behind the scenes when I run /sbin/cryptsetup ? I remember a few years back, still on debian, I resolved to replace my encfs usage with something more "modern" (phew) just to avoid getting left in the cold with no support, as may be happening to Meino. The first such modern thing that came to mind was what ubuntu (and maybe debian) used to mount encrypted filesystems on boot, and I think that was called ecryptfs, but that was so very complex and opaque that I didn't get far. After a while I found my current way usign cryptsetup. But the ubuntu stuff may have been just wrapping and packaging, hence my question. -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Personal signed mail: please _encrypt_ and sign Don't clear-text sign: http://primate.net/~itz/blog/the-problem-with-gpg-signatures.html
