Andrew Lowe wrote:
Greetings all,
I'm probably in the situation where I can't see the wood for the
trees so a bit of help would be appreciated. I've decided to go the
LABEL route in fstab and have set the labels on my partitions a few
days ago. I now want to update fstab but can't remember
On Aug 1, 2011 7:13 PM, "Andrew Lowe" wrote:
>
> Greetings all,
>I'm probably in the situation where I can't see the wood for the
trees so a bit of help would be appreciated. I've decided to go the LABEL
route in fstab and have set the labels on my partitions a few days ago. I
now want to
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Greetings all,
> I'm probably in the situation where I can't see the wood for the
> trees so a bit of help would be appreciated. I've decided to go the LABEL
> route in fstab and have set the labels on my partitions a few days ago. I
> no
IIRC
'ifconfig -a' will show interfaces that are physically present, and
the driver available.
'ifconfig' will only show those interfaces that are also activated or
"up", which means configured up - nothing to do with link.
I'm not sure what RUNNING means... perhaps that indicates link (for
ethern
On Tuesday, August 2 at 10:12 (+0800), Andrew Lowe said:
> Greetings all,
> I'm probably in the situation where I can't see the wood for the trees
> so a bit of help would be appreciated. I've decided to go the LABEL
> route in fstab and have set the labels on my partitions a few days ag
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Greetings all,
> I'm probably in the situation where I can't see the wood for the
> trees so a bit of help would be appreciated. I've decided to go the LABEL
> route in fstab and have set the labels on my partitions a few days ago. I
> n
Greetings all,
I'm probably in the situation where I can't see the wood for the trees
so a bit of help would be appreciated. I've decided to go the LABEL
route in fstab and have set the labels on my partitions a few days ago.
I now want to update fstab but can't remember the names. I can't fin
On Monday 01 August 2011 22:11:39 Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
> Thunderbird has a setting to create multiple mail accounts with separate
> mailfolder-hiearachy (inbox, draft, outbox, sent, trash) for each account
> instead of putting all mails in the same folder hierachy (as does
> Evolution in G
On Mon 01 August 2011 23:11:39 Kristian Poul Herkild did opine thusly:
> Hi there.
>
> Thunderbird has a setting to create multiple mail accounts with
> separate mailfolder-hiearachy (inbox, draft, outbox, sent, trash)
> for each account instead of putting all mails in the same folder
> hierachy (
On Monday 01 August 2011 17:58:18 David W Noon wrote:
> The make menuconfig will silently do a make oldconfig on the
> existing .config file before it puts the menu on the screen. This
> means that the options in the menu hierarchy will reflect the options
> that were in your old .config file, wi
Hi there.
Thunderbird has a setting to create multiple mail accounts with separate
mailfolder-hiearachy (inbox, draft, outbox, sent, trash) for each account
instead of putting all mails in the same folder hierachy (as does
Evolution in
Gnome). Does anybody know where to find that or an identical s
On Monday 01 Aug 2011 21:38:41 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> 2011/8/1 José Romildo Malaquias :
> > Hello.
> >
> > I have two network interfaces on my notebook: one wired (eth0) and one
> > wireless (wlan0). I am running ~amd64 on it.
> >
> > I want two gentoo boot entries in grub: one (the default
On 2011-08-01, BRM wrote:
I would say switch to LibreOffice and don't look back. :)
>>>
>>> I wouldn't. While LibreOffice may have some advances at the moment,
>>> I'm still interested in following main-line OOo - now being setting
>>> under Apache.
>>
>> So you don't use the gentoo OOo
On 2011-08-01, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Use oldconfig. Running 'oldconfig' will prompt you for any new
> sections/drivers that have appeared since your last kernel. Running
> 'menuconfig' will silently accept all of the defaults for these new
> options.
>
> Why is it safer if only the new stuff
2011/8/1 José Romildo Malaquias :
> Hello.
>
> I have two network interfaces on my notebook: one wired (eth0) and one
> wireless (wlan0). I am running ~amd64 on it.
>
> I want two gentoo boot entries in grub: one (the default softlevel)
> which starts wired networking (and not wireless), and anothe
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Grant wrote:
> # ls /sys/bus/pci/devices/:04:00.0
> broken_parity_status device irq msi_bus reset
> resource2_wc subsystem_device vpd
> class dma_mask_bits local_cpulist net
> resource resource4 subsyste
On 08/01/2011 12:00 PM, kashani wrote:
> On 7/31/2011 7:06 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> Let's say I have a .config from an older kernel version (for example,
>> 2.6.38), and now I want to install a newer kernel (let's say, 3.0).
>>
>> Is it necessary to first do `make oldconfig`, or is it safe to go
My laptop's
r8169 eth0 appears under ifconfig even when there's no ethernet cable
attached. That's the expected behavior isn't it?
>>>
>>> Sure; ifconfig will even tell you if the link is up or down. Just
>>> because the link is down doesn't mean the interface isn't there. :)
>>
>>
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Grant wrote:
>>> My laptop's
>>> r8169 eth0 appears under ifconfig even when there's no ethernet cable
>>> attached. That's the expected behavior isn't it?
>>
>> Sure; ifconfig will even tell you if the link is up or down. Just
>> because the link is down doesn't
...
> Setting up some peristent udev rules keyed on a NIC's MAC address will
> help keep things orderly for you.
I deleted the persistent-net.rules file and rebooted and everything
came up properly numbered. eth0 was being renamed to eth1 previously
because I had used that hard drive on a differe
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Grant wrote:
>> That's odd. Does that box still have the failed loading firmware
>> error? Perhaps missing firmware stops eth0 from being created. I'd try
>> installing linux-fireware and trying again (assuming you havent
>> already).
>
> I didn't have the firmware
> I'm guessing that radeon-ucode and rt61-firmware and all the others
> are being deprecated in favour of linux-firmware, but i don't recall
> seeing an elog on it.
Does anyone know if this is the case? Doesn't seem very Gentoo-like,
although it should minimize package management for the devs whi
Peter Humphrey humphrey.ukfsn.org> writes:
> My little Atom box's hard disk spins up every minute or so, and watching
> iotop I see it's jbd2 that does it.
> Google shows that others have similar problems.
> Before I re-create all the partitions as reiserfs - and remove ext4 from the
> kerne
pk coolmail.se> writes:
> > the "4k block" (GPT) issue? Maybe I missed it
> > on the minimal CD?
> If you're after GPT-able partition software you can use (g)parted,
> available on the Gentoo live cd (it _should_ handle 4k disks as well):
> http://www.gentoo.org/news/20110308-livedvd.xml
Sor
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> Am Sonntag 31 Juli 2011, 19:11:06 schrieb Michael Mol:
>
>> Yet would potentially run afoul of the SSD's write block resolution.
>> And, of course, having the journal fail out from under me would be a
>> fair bit worse than the kernel p
On 8/1/2011 9:48 AM, Pau Peris wrote:
Hi, i've followed that guide
http://vh4x0r.wordpress.com/2010/08/17/installing-oracle-11g-on-linux-amd64/
in order to install oracle 11g but i get the following error when
running:
./runInstaller: line 254: /apphome/oracle/database/instal
Am Sonntag 31 Juli 2011, 19:11:06 schrieb Michael Mol:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>
> wrote:
> > Am Sonntag 31 Juli 2011, 10:44:28 schrieb Michael Mol:
> >> While I take your point about write-cycle limitations, and I would
> >> *assume* you're familiar with the vario
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:46 PM, BRM wrote:
>> From: Grant Edwards
> All I'm saying is that I want to stick with the Apache OOo in the long run,
> not LibreOffice.
Grant's point (if I read it correctly) was that you were effectively
using LO, just with OOo branding, because the Go-Oo patches we
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 21:39:29 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Re: make oldconfig necessary?:
> What I meant was:
>
> If I want a kernel config as close as possible to the older kernel,
> can I just use `make menuconfig`, or do I have to first run `make
> oldconfig`.
Just copy you
>
> Hi, i've followed that guide
> http://vh4x0r.wordpress.com/2010/08/17/installing-oracle-11g-on-linux-amd64/
> in order to install oracle 11g but i get the following error when running:
>
> ./runInstaller: line 254: /apphome/oracle/database/install/.oui: cannot
> execute binary file
>
>
> These
- Original Message -
> From: Grant Edwards
> Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Openoffice being replaced?
> On 2011-07-29, BRM wrote:
>>> From: Paul Hartman
>>> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:41 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> Something that's been tickling my brain for a couple years now, and
>> you guys are probably the right ones to ask.
>>
>> I haven't dropped coin for an SSD (yet), but I was wondering abou
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> Something that's been tickling my brain for a couple years now, and
> you guys are probably the right ones to ask.
>
> I haven't dropped coin for an SSD (yet), but I was wondering about
> uses for them beyond using them for / or /home.
>
> 1) W
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Grant wrote:
>> I remembered that i also had started having a problem with my intel
>> wireless card, and it looks like both the intel and realtek firmwares
>> are now in linux-firmware so try emerging that.
>
> That fixed it. Thank you very much. I'm a little pu
On 7/31/2011 7:06 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Let's say I have a .config from an older kernel version (for example,
2.6.38), and now I want to install a newer kernel (let's say, 3.0).
Is it necessary to first do `make oldconfig`, or is it safe to go
directly to `make menuconfig`?
Necessary to run
On Sunday 31 July 2011 22:40:28 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Does laptop-mode help?
> app-laptop/laptop-mode-tools
I hadn't thought of that - thanks. I'll try it and see.
--
Rgds
Peter Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2011-08-01, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> Let's say I have a .config from an older kernel version (for example,
>> 2.6.38), and now I want to install a newer kernel (let's say, 3.0).
>>
>> Is it necessary to first do `make oldconfig`, or is it s
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 21:09, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-08-01, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> Let's say I have a .config from an older kernel version (for example,
>> 2.6.38), and now I want to install a newer kernel (let's say, 3.0).
>>
>> Is it necessary to first do `make oldconfig`, or is it safe
On 2011-08-01, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> Let's say I have a .config from an older kernel version (for example,
> 2.6.38), and now I want to install a newer kernel (let's say, 3.0).
>
> Is it necessary to first do `make oldconfig`, or is it safe to go
> directly to `make menuconfig`?
It's always safe
Harry Putnam [11-08-01 15:12]:
> meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have to old (technical identical) harddisks formerly used for backup
> > purposes. They contain each a different set of files -- the
> > partitioning is identical. Both disks are nearly filled.
> >
> > The harddisk i
Hello.
I have two network interfaces on my notebook: one wired (eth0) and one
wireless (wlan0). I am running ~amd64 on it.
I want two gentoo boot entries in grub: one (the default softlevel)
which starts wired networking (and not wireless), and another that
starts the wireless network (and not th
meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have to old (technical identical) harddisks formerly used for backup
> purposes. They contain each a different set of files -- the
> partitioning is identical. Both disks are nearly filled.
>
> The harddisk in my PC has more free space (they contain a totall
On Monday, August 1 at 12:41 (+0200), Joost Roeleveld said:
> On Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:02:22 AM Florian Philipp wrote:
> > @system used to contain portage. It doesn't by default, anymore. If
> you
> > do `emerge -pv --depclean`, portage should try to remove itself.
> Just
> > add it to @world
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:06:17 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote about
"[gentoo-user] make oldconfig necessary?":
>Let's say I have a .config from an older kernel version (for example,
>2.6.38), and now I want to install a newer kernel (let's say, 3.0).
>
>Is it
On Sunday, July 31 at 21:23 (-0500), Jeremy McSpadden said:
> Better to run make oldconfig. It merges the changes.
>
> --
> Jeremy McSpadden
> def...@uberpenguin.net
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2011, at 9:06 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> > Let's say I have a .config from an older kernel version (fo
On Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:02:22 AM Florian Philipp wrote:
> @system used to contain portage. It doesn't by default, anymore. If you
> do `emerge -pv --depclean`, portage should try to remove itself. Just
> add it to @world by doing `emerge --noreplace portage`
It doesn't try this on my system.
Michael Schreckenbauer [11-07-31 21:04]:
> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, 31. Juli 2011, 17:09:08 schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> > Hi,
> >
> > to compile the Mitsuba renderer I need "glewmx" (whatever this means).
> > Postings on the net let me believe, that "glewmx" is a part of glew,
> > which in turn is
47 matches
Mail list logo
