On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Paul Hartman
<paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Michael Mol <mike...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Something that's been tickling my brain for a couple years now, and
>> you guys are probably the right ones to ask.
>>
>> I haven't dropped coin for an SSD (yet), but I was wondering about
>> uses for them beyond using them for / or /home.
>>
>> 1) What about sitting swap (partition, file, whatever) on the SSD?
>> Presumably, in scenarios where expanding the RAM in a system is
>> prohibitively expensive, an SSD could reduce the impact of swap
>> thrash.
>
> Swap on flash memory is faster than on disk, but it is still swap and
> still sucks. :) There's no reason why it won't work, but I doubt it'll
> have as much of a positive impact as you're hoping. In fact depending
> on the SSD some don't cope with a storm of tiny simultaneous random
> reads and writes and might block even worse than a fast HDD. IMO.

Yeah, true; the write caching and queuing of some of the lower-end
drives are crap, from what I've heard. The primary reason I haven't
spent on and SSD yet is while I could afford a low-end drive, I can't
afford a smaller-size drive that's a good implementation.

>
>> 2) While my system rarely goes above using 2-2.5GB of RAM, I enjoy
>> having 6-8GB of RAM, just for the file cache. Of course, I lose that
>> when I reboot; the cache needs to be repopulated. Has there been any
>> work in the kernel for doing things like Vista/Win7's ReadyBoost?
>> ReadyBoost has a ridiculous limit to only using 4GB of a flash drive,
>> but I'd think that an 80GB SSD would be a massive performance
>> improvement.
>
> I believe DM-Cache provides this kind of functionality in Linux. I've
> never tried it.

That's *exactly* the kind of thing I was hoping was being worked on. I
hadn't heard anyone was actually *doing* it.

>
> You can also buy a hybrid hard drive, it is a traditional HDD with SSD
> built-in for caching. That is transparent to the operating system.

They've sounded interesting, yes.

-- 
:wq

Reply via email to