On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:46 PM, BRM <bm_witn...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com> > All I'm saying is that I want to stick with the Apache OOo in the long run, > not LibreOffice.
Grant's point (if I read it correctly) was that you were effectively using LO, just with OOo branding, because the Go-Oo patches were already being applied. In short, no functional distinction. So why care now, when nothing's really changed? > Users can switch to the LibreOffice install if they desire, but there's no > reason for force those that want to continue with OOo to move over. Except that, on Gentoo, they effectively already had, without realizing it. Sure, OOo and LO may take different paths going forward, but, on Gentoo, they were already largely equivalent in deviation from OOo upstream. Perhaps what you want to do is ask that someone *add* and maintain an "authentic" OOo ebuild? (If there was demand for an authentic OOo ebuild, why wasn't there one already?) -- :wq
