doherty pete wrote:
when i start the kernel, it wait long time to dhcp for eth0:
eth0:dhcped 4.0.15 starting
eth0:waiting for carrier
i want to forbid dhcp,how can i do?
--
pete_doherty
I'm not sure but would this help?
# Some people want a finer grain over hotplug/coldplug. RC_PLUG_SERVICES
On Friday 14 January 2011 04:00:12 Michael Sullivan wrote:
> A several years ago I ran a public network out of my apartment. I had
> email, www, etc. etc. It all worked fine. Then one day a couple of
> years ago we decided that we could not afford to pay for a public IP
> address anymore, so we
> when i start the kernel, it wait long time to dhcp for eth0:
> eth0:dhcped 4.0.15 starting
> eth0:waiting for carrier
>
> i want to forbid dhcp,how can i do?
>
> --
> pete_doherty
>
Look at /etc/conf.d/net.example and set a static IP for eth0 or remove
/etc/init.d/net.eth0 (to not start the inte
when i start the kernel, it wait long time to dhcp for eth0:
eth0:dhcped 4.0.15 starting
eth0:waiting for carrier
i want to forbid dhcp,how can i do?
--
pete_doherty
A several years ago I ran a public network out of my apartment. I had
email, www, etc. etc. It all worked fine. Then one day a couple of
years ago we decided that we could not afford to pay for a public IP
address anymore, so we had it turned off. I haven't touched apache
since then, but we sti
On 2011-01-13 20:14, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> They are easy to spot though as only CDs adhering to the red book standard
> are
> legally allowed to display the Audio-CD logo.
Yeah, I read about Philips talking to the music industry about this a
few years ago, claiming they would take them to court
A several years ago I ran a public network out of my apartment. I had
email, www, etc. etc. It all worked fine. Then one day a couple of
years ago we decided that we could not afford to pay for a public IP
address anymore, so we had it turned off. I haven't touched apache
since then, but we sti
yes, but that should have an effect on swap space.
Cheers
Kad
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Bill Longman wrote:
> On 01/13/2011 09:59 AM, Kaddeh wrote:
> > I have a standard 2x RAM swap size of 4gb.
> > The problem that I am seeing though is that the applications (MySQL and
> > apache) are
On 1/12/2011 10:59 AM, Kaddeh wrote:
So, I have run into an interesting problem while building out a web
server for a client which I haven't come across before and I was hoping
that the list would be a good way for me to find the answer.
A little beckground on the systems:
P4 @ 3.0Ghz
2GB PC2 420
On 1/13/2011 10:32 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
I think I had the CONFIG flags set to Y already. The BIOS change and a
shut down before booting was what apparently solved it. I shutdown the
laptop and went to bed, the next morning after booting the machine I
fired up vbox and all worked. I have
On 01/13/2011 09:59 AM, Kaddeh wrote:
> I have a standard 2x RAM swap size of 4gb.
> The problem that I am seeing though is that the applications (MySQL and
> apache) are segfaulting -before- the system starts to swap, almost where
> they have an aversion to using swap.
Are you running 32 bits?
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:00 AM, pk wrote:
> On 2011-01-13 10:41, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> No. Hard disks are hard disks, BIOSes are BIOSes. If that changed, the
>> World would fall apart. That's why you can get a kernel panic if you
>> forgot to build your SATA controller's drivers into the kern
On Thursday 13 January 2011 19:12:05 pk wrote:
> On 2011-01-13 17:54, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > cdda2wav nows aabout vendor unique SCSI commands that give better results
> > and it knows about various defects and deviations from the Red book
> > standard. With this knowledge, it is able to extract
On 01/11/2011 03:09 PM, Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
> In <1294686017.7979@rumba> elw...@agouros.de (Konstantinos Agouros) writes:
>
>> Hi,
>
>> I just upgraded my box to a phenom and an intel quad gbit card.
>> The card is a 82575GB. It is recognized (I use xen-sources 2.6.34-r4) and
>> also trie
On 01/13/2011 09:58 AM, Bill Longman wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 07:25 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>> On 01/12/2011 10:57 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>>
If not BIOS then I'd look at kernel config next.
- Mark
>>>
>>> If it h
On 2011-01-13 17:54, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> cdda2wav nows aabout vendor unique SCSI commands that give better results and
> it knows about various defects and deviations from the Red book standard.
> With this knowledge, it is able to extract things typically better and in
> many
> cases it i
I have a standard 2x RAM swap size of 4gb.
The problem that I am seeing though is that the applications (MySQL and
apache) are segfaulting -before- the system starts to swap, almost where
they have an aversion to using swap.
Cheers
Kad
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 12/
Le 13/01/2011 17:41, Mick a écrit :
> On 13 January 2011 16:17, Jacques Montier
> wrote:
>> Le 13/01/2011 12:28, J. Roeleveld a écrit :
>>> On Thursday 13 January 2011 12:17:24 Dale wrote:
Jacques Montier wrote:
> I re-emerged grub in Gentoo with my separated (sda3) boot partition
> m
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 10:57 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> If not BIOS then I'd look at kernel config next.
>>>
>>> - Mark
>>>
>>
>> If it helps here's my 2.6.36-r6 .config.
>>
>> Cheers
On 12/1/2011, at 10:47pm, Kaddeh wrote:
> ...
> First, addressing the SQL issue and why I think that that could be one of
> the causes. The entire site, for the most part is all in one giant DB
> (~9GB) a significant part of that is a 3gb table full of raw image data
> (yes, I know that this is a
pk wrote:
> On 2011-01-13 16:01, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > Which program does lack what?
>
> As I understand it, he refered to what you wrote (i.e. the "sales
> pitch") not to any program...
>
> But I'm a bit curious about how cdparanoia and cdda2wav can be
> inferior/superior at all; they bot
On 2011-01-13 14:12, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> That's right, so GRUB's current lifespan will end when we use those
> methods exclusively. This won't happen soon.
Intel is pushing (U)EFI...
http://www.taranfx.com/bios-death-uefi
http://www.hardcoreware.net/msi-using-uefi-sandy-bridge/
Best regards
On 2011-01-13 16:01, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Which program does lack what?
As I understand it, he refered to what you wrote (i.e. the "sales
pitch") not to any program...
But I'm a bit curious about how cdparanoia and cdda2wav can be
inferior/superior at all; they both read the same _digital_ d
On 13 January 2011 16:17, Jacques Montier
wrote:
> Le 13/01/2011 12:28, J. Roeleveld a écrit :
>> On Thursday 13 January 2011 12:17:24 Dale wrote:
>>> Jacques Montier wrote:
I re-emerged grub in Gentoo with my separated (sda3) boot partition
mounted and now it works !
I don't unders
Le 13/01/2011 12:28, J. Roeleveld a écrit :
> On Thursday 13 January 2011 12:17:24 Dale wrote:
>> Jacques Montier wrote:
>>> I re-emerged grub in Gentoo with my separated (sda3) boot partition
>>> mounted and now it works !
>>> I don't understand...
>>>
>>>
>>> Jacques
>> I wonder if it is a bug or
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:25:08 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > > > cdda2wav gives inferior quality compared to cdparanoia and is still
> > > > actively maintained.
> > >
> > > Did you really mean to write that?
> >
> > Of course: no, I wanted to write superior ;-)
>
On 13 January 2011 13:12, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:00:45 +0100, pk wrote:
>
>> If I remember correctly, grub (legacy) is not compatible with EFI or
>> GPT...
>
> That's right, so GRUB's current lifespan will end when we use those
> methods exclusively. This won't happen soon.
On 01/12/2011 07:25 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 10:57 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> If not BIOS then I'd look at kernel config next.
>>>
>>> - Mark
>>>
>>
>> If it helps here's my 2.6.36-r6 .config.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:25:08 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > cdda2wav gives inferior quality compared to cdparanoia and is still
> > > actively maintained.
> >
> > Did you really mean to write that?
>
> Of course: no, I wanted to write superior ;-)
As a sales pitch, it did seem rather l
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:37:04 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > cdda2wav gives inferior quality compared to cdparanoia and is still
> > actively maintained.
>
> Did you really mean to write that?
Of course: no, I wanted to write superior ;-)
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schil
wick :
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:37:04 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
>> cdda2wav gives inferior quality compared to cdparanoia and is still
>> actively maintained.
>
> Did you really mean to write that?
Probably s/inferior/superior/
--
Daniel Pielmeier
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:37:04 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> cdda2wav gives inferior quality compared to cdparanoia and is still
> actively maintained.
Did you really mean to write that?
--
Neil Bothwick
Never sleep with anyone crazier than yourself.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatur
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:00:45 +0100, pk wrote:
> If I remember correctly, grub (legacy) is not compatible with EFI or
> GPT...
That's right, so GRUB's current lifespan will end when we use those
methods exclusively. This won't happen soon.
I'd be more than happy for GRUB1 to become obsolete if it
On Thursday 13 January 2011 13:37:04 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> > From the FAQ on cdparanoia's website (http://xiph.org/paranoia/faq.html)
> > it looks like that it's not based on cdda2wav, but actually uses a
> > re-write of cdda2wav since January 1998.
> >
> > If this is t
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> On Thursday 13 January 2011 12:07:02 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> > > Can you actually play that wav-file? Or is it just a collection of
> > > garbage?
> > >
> > > As far as I know, CD-Paranoia access the cd-drive a bit more directly
> > > then othe
On 2011-01-13 10:41, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> No. Hard disks are hard disks, BIOSes are BIOSes. If that changed, the
> World would fall apart. That's why you can get a kernel panic if you
> forgot to build your SATA controller's drivers into the kernel, but GRUB
> quite happily loaded the same kerne
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> From the FAQ on cdparanoia's website (http://xiph.org/paranoia/faq.html) it
> looks like that it's not based on cdda2wav, but actually uses a re-write of
> cdda2wav since January 1998.
>
> If this is the case, does it still have inferior quality compared to
> cdda23wav?
On Thursday 13 January 2011 12:17:24 Dale wrote:
> Jacques Montier wrote:
> > I re-emerged grub in Gentoo with my separated (sda3) boot partition
> > mounted and now it works !
> > I don't understand...
> >
> >
> > Jacques
>
> I wonder if it is a bug or something in the CD you booted? I recentl
On Thursday 13 January 2011 12:07:02 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> > Can you actually play that wav-file? Or is it just a collection of
> > garbage?
> >
> > As far as I know, CD-Paranoia access the cd-drive a bit more directly
> > then other tools. Eg. it approaches it like a C
Jacques Montier wrote:
I re-emerged grub in Gentoo with my separated (sda3) boot partition
mounted and now it works !
I don't understand...
Jacques
I wonder if it is a bug or something in the CD you booted? I recently
booted systemrescue CD and it worked fine but I didn't try to insta
On Thursday 13 January 2011 12:07:02 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> > Can you actually play that wav-file? Or is it just a collection of
> > garbage?
> >
> > As far as I know, CD-Paranoia access the cd-drive a bit more directly
> > then other tools. Eg. it approaches it like a C
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> Can you actually play that wav-file? Or is it just a collection of garbage?
>
> As far as I know, CD-Paranoia access the cd-drive a bit more directly then
> other tools. Eg. it approaches it like a CD-ROM, rather then CD-Audio.
You are mistaken, cdparanoia is a patch on
Le 13/01/2011 11:36, Dale a écrit :
> Jacques Montier wrote:
>> Le 13/01/2011 10:59, Dale a écrit :
>>
>>> Jacques Montier wrote:
>>>
What i did this morning :
- boot from a sysrescuecd cdrom.
I have 4 partitions for boot, /, usr and home, so :
- mount /dev/sda6 /mn
On Thursday 13 January 2011 11:33:09 Jake Moe wrote:
> On 01/13/11 18:12, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 January 2011 07:12:48 Jake Moe wrote:
> >> If you're talking about "proper" Audio-CD as one that's audio-only, no
> >> mixed data in there as well, then yes, I'm sure. And I have over 5
Jacques Montier wrote:
Le 13/01/2011 10:59, Dale a écrit :
Jacques Montier wrote:
What i did this morning :
- boot from a sysrescuecd cdrom.
I have 4 partitions for boot, /, usr and home, so :
- mount /dev/sda6 /mnt/gentoo
- mount /dev/sda3 /mnt/gentoo/boot
- mount /dev/sda7 /mnt/gen
On 01/13/11 18:12, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday 13 January 2011 07:12:48 Jake Moe wrote:
>> If you're talking about "proper" Audio-CD as one that's audio-only, no
>> mixed data in there as well, then yes, I'm sure. And I have over 500
>> CDs; I can't test them all. :-P But yeah, a selection
Le 13/01/2011 10:59, Dale a écrit :
> Jacques Montier wrote:
>>
>> What i did this morning :
>> - boot from a sysrescuecd cdrom.
>>
>> I have 4 partitions for boot, /, usr and home, so :
>> - mount /dev/sda6 /mnt/gentoo
>> - mount /dev/sda3 /mnt/gentoo/boot
>> - mount /dev/sda7 /mnt/gentoo/usr
>> -
Jacques Montier wrote:
What i did this morning :
- boot from a sysrescuecd cdrom.
I have 4 partitions for boot, /, usr and home, so :
- mount /dev/sda6 /mnt/gentoo
- mount /dev/sda3 /mnt/gentoo/boot
- mount /dev/sda7 /mnt/gentoo/usr
- mount /dev/sda8 /mnt/gentoo/home
- mount -t proc proc /mnt/g
Le 12/01/2011 22:48, Stroller a écrit :
> On 12/1/2011, at 6:14pm, Jacques Montier wrote:
>> ...
>> after chroot, i can install every package except grub in /boot.
>> I get the message : "your boot partition, detected as being mounted as
>> /boot, is read-only.
>> Remounting it in read-write mode .
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:49:52 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > What can change? We are stuck with a hardware spec from 30 years ago
> > for booting. That won't change any time soon.
> >
>
> File systems for one. They do make new ones every once in a while. '
That's the one area ion which GRUB may n
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:59:19 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > There's nothing gratuitous about it.
> > It's perfectly suited for the purpose, in this particular case.
>
> No it is not: there's no need for it. it adds nothing useful, and it
> makes one wince. The sense would not have been chang
On Thursday 13 January 2011 07:12:48 Jake Moe wrote:
>
> If you're talking about "proper" Audio-CD as one that's audio-only, no
> mixed data in there as well, then yes, I'm sure. And I have over 500
> CDs; I can't test them all. :-P But yeah, a selection of CDs have all
> had the same result.
On Thursday 13 January 2011 01:40:09 Dale wrote:
> You got a crystal ball or something?
Not yet, my supplier is still awaiting new stock from the manufacturer...
--
Joost
53 matches
Mail list logo
