> ...and if that doesn't fix it I'm sure the upstream devs will be
interested
> to know of the problem.
I have opened a bug report, and also got a response, which I will try:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266868
quoth the Mike Kazantsev:
>
> ...or, you can accept mask and just downgrade udev (adding later,
> incompatible versions to package.mask: ">=sys-fs/udev-...").
> I'd suggest issuing this command to see which one will suit your system:
Ok, I found the version of baselayout was masked for 'corruptio
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:29:44 +1000
Beau Henderson wrote:
> So is GCC ignoring the fact that the systems CHOST is i686 or is this
> truly optimized for my situation ?
No, it shouldn't ignore CHOST to produce the correct binaries.
And yes, I believe (according to man gcc) that native/core2 or an
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Mike Kazantsev
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:20:34 +1000
> Beau Henderson wrote:
>
>> I was playing around with a few non-essential packages the other day
>> using -march=native -v on my core2 duo ( configured with
>> CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" ) and noticed tha
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:01:27 -0500
Paul Hartman wrote:
> Does any RC expert know why denyhosts is showing "Crashed" status
> despite the fact that it seems to be running and operating normally?
> Is anyone else running denyhosts and has this same symptom?
I'm not an expert, but that could be jus
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:11:32 +0200
Thomas Chef wrote:
> > Try rebuilding x11-libs/cairo
>
> I tried:
> # emerge x11-libs/cairo
>
> Which seems to have worked out ok, then ran emerge fontforge, but it
> ended up in the same error as before ?
>
> I searched the disk for the file: cairo-xlib.h (i
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:20:34 +1000
Beau Henderson wrote:
> I was playing around with a few non-essential packages the other day
> using -march=native -v on my core2 duo ( configured with
> CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" ) and noticed that GCC set the -march=core2
> rather than what is typically sugges
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:00:40 -0600
darren kirby wrote:
> Can anybody at least confirm this is not correct behavior? Suggest how to
> troubleshoot this further? As best as I can tell my profile is
> ok, 'hardened/x86' and portage doesn't want to update itself...
I'd suggest to look at all versi
Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
That happened to me recently. Just change the value of the variable
RC_PLUG_SERVICES in /etc/conf.d/net to exclude eth0, like eg
RC_PLUG_SERVICES="!net.eth0"
That did it. Never actually looked inside /etc/conf.d/rc.
Thanks,
--
Valmor
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:47:22 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>
>> I renamed my old emerge log file to .old1 to get off to a fresh start
>> with the log file. It was getting pretty large. Anyway, to figure out
>> how long something takes to emerge, I use this command and get this
>>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:58 PM, daid kahl wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I was running the unstable branch of portage primarily for about two years
> (mostly from user error when I first started), and I finally committed to
> downgrading to the stable branch last night. I did backups first, and I'm
> keepi
Hello!
I was running the unstable branch of portage primarily for about two years
(mostly from user error when I first started), and I finally committed to
downgrading to the stable branch last night. I did backups first, and I'm
keeping some good logs of any trouble I encounter.
So far, gnome l
G'day,
I was playing around with a few non-essential packages the other day
using -march=native -v on my core2 duo ( configured with
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" ) and noticed that GCC set the -march=core2
rather than what is typically suggested on the 3rd party wiki ( which
is to use prescott ). Acc
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:47:22 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I renamed my old emerge log file to .old1 to get off to a fresh start
> with the log file. It was getting pretty large. Anyway, to figure out
> how long something takes to emerge, I use this command and get this
> response:
[snip]
> Why does it
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, 01:44, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> Philip Webb wrote:
> > & I start net.eth0 by hand, so it looks as if it's 'netmount'.
>
> I removed netmount from all run levels and still get net.eth0 started.
> It is happening before; during booting I see the line
>
> *Wiping /tmp d
Philip Webb wrote:
& I start net.eth0 by hand, so it looks as if it's 'netmount'.
I removed netmount from all run levels and still get net.eth0 started.
It is happening before; during booting I see the line
*Wiping /tmp directory...
*Device initiated services: net.eth0 udev-postmount
Tom wrote:
kernel ... video=vesafb:mtrr:3,ywrap vga=795
That gives me 1280x1024. I don't know at what refreshrate though...
There should be a line in your /var/log/messages file that shows the
refresh rate; at least intelfb does show that; not sure vesafb does the
same.
those options, wh
090420 Philip Webb wrote:
> Can anyone tell me the command to pre-start KDE libs with another desktop ?
> Htop reveals that 'konsole' -- the 1st app I started after Fluxbox --
> caused the following processes to start & remain running :
>
> 3863 kdeinit running ...
> 3866 dcopserver [kdeinit]
090420 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> I would like to start net.eth0 manually, therefore I currently have
> -> rc-update show
>acpid | battery default
> bootmisc | boot
> checkfs | boot
>checkroot | boot
>
> kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/ram0
> real_root=/dev/mapper/system-slash \ ro
> resume=swap:/dev/mapper/system-swap vga=0x318 quiet \
> video=intelfb:1024x768...@60,mttr,noaccel,hwcursor,vram=4 \
> splash=silent,theme:natural_gentoo console=tty1
I use vesafb, my line is much more simple, just
Hello,
I would like to start net.eth0 manually, therefore I currently have
-> rc-update show
acpid | battery default
bootmisc | boot
checkfs | boot
checkroot | boot
clock | boot
conso
Sebastian Günther wrote:
* Valmor de Almeida (val.gen...@gmail.com) [20.04.09 23:23]:
since the mode option under intelfb is useless. I could also drop the
video parameter altogether since I only have the intelfb driver compiled
into the kernel.
Only if you don't want to use it: this paramete
* Valmor de Almeida (val.gen...@gmail.com) [20.04.09 23:23]:
>
> since the mode option under intelfb is useless. I could also drop the
> video parameter altogether since I only have the intelfb driver compiled
> into the kernel.
Only if you don't want to use it: this parameter is necessary to
* Valmor de Almeida (val.gen...@gmail.com) [20.04.09 22:29]:
> Sebastian Günther wrote:
>
> >
> > This is the hint: intelfb can't change the video mode. But intelfb can
> > be used if you /also/ add a vga to the kernel command line. I will post
> > mine as an example:
> >
> > kernel /boot/vmli
Mike Edenfield wrote:
these log messages. I assume this is a laptop (or else your intelfb is
very confused). For some reason that I don't fully understand, but
It is a laptop indeed.
assume is a good one, the intel fb device cannot change the video mode
on a laptop display. The vga par
Peter Humphrey wrote:
kernel /boot/kernel-x86_64-2.6.29-gentoo-r1 root=/dev/md0 vga=0x31A
video=vesafb:mtrr:3,ywrap fbcon=scrollback:128k splash=silent
memory_corruption_check=1
Thanks for letting me know the fbcon=scrollback option.
--
Valmor
Sebastian Günther wrote:
This is the hint: intelfb can't change the video mode. But intelfb can
be used if you /also/ add a vga to the kernel command line. I will post
mine as an example:
kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/ram0 real_root=/dev/mapper/system-slash \
ro resume=swap:/dev/mapper/sy
On 4/20/2009 2:47 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
but no luck (that is I get the 80x25 console). The only working format
appears to be
kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3 vga=xxx
This is the only correct syntax for the intelfb device, because of
Apr 20 14:27:54 dcpl-lpt1 [ 0.173678] intelfb: N
On Monday 20 April 2009 19:47:15 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> I've been trying the following grub.conf boot
>
> kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3 video=intelfb,mode=1280x768...@60
> but no luck (that is I get the 80x25 console). The only working format
> appears to be
>
> kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=
* Valmor de Almeida (val.gen...@gmail.com) [20.04.09 20:48]:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying the following grub.conf boot
>
> kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3 video=intelfb,mode=1280x768...@60
>
> but no luck (that is I get the 80x25 console). The only working format
> appears to be
>
> ke
090420 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 20 April 2009 16:25:07 Philip Webb wrote:
>> Can anyone tell me the command to pre-start KDE libs with another desktop ?
> I believe it's kcminit but it doesn't show up in ps afterwards.
Thanks for the hint, which got me to look at what's running via 'htop'.
Can anybody at least confirm this is not correct behavior? Suggest how to
troubleshoot this further? As best as I can tell my profile is
ok, 'hardened/x86' and portage doesn't want to update itself...
I don't understand why my currently installed udev wants the currently
installed baselayout bu
Hello,
I've been trying the following grub.conf boot
kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3 video=intelfb,mode=1280x768...@60
but no luck (that is I get the 80x25 console). The only working format
appears to be
kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3 vga=xxx
where xxx does not accommodate the mod
Does any RC expert know why denyhosts is showing "Crashed" status
despite the fact that it seems to be running and operating normally?
Is anyone else running denyhosts and has this same symptom?
Thanks,
Paul
2009/4/21 Liviu Andronic
> 2009/4/20 Sebastián Magrí :
> > There are a few tweaks one can do to speed up things...
> >
> Such as..
>
Mostly rc.conf things...
rc_parallel="YES"
rc_interactive="NO"
rc_depend_strict="NO"
>
>
> --
> Do you know how to read?
> http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cf
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Liviu Andronic
> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> Today I stumbled on several posts [1] [2] concerning start-up speed of
>> Linux. Compared with the 5-17 secs posted in the posts, my (slightly
>> old) Gentoo needs aro
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Dear all,
> Today I stumbled on several posts [1] [2] concerning start-up speed of
> Linux. Compared with the 5-17 secs posted in the posts, my (slightly
> old) Gentoo needs around two minutes from power button to DE idle.
> Are there any de
On Monday 20 April 2009 14:54:40 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 20 April 2009 15:44:48 Thomas Chef wrote:
> > Do I issue [a] bug report ?
> >
> > In file included from fontP.h:109,
> > from gdrawtxt.c:30:
> > gxdrawP.h:83:32: error: cairo/cairo-xlib.h: No such file or directory
>
2009/4/20 Sebastián Magrí :
> There are a few tweaks one can do to speed up things...
>
Such as..
--
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail
> Try rebuilding x11-libs/cairo
I tried:
# emerge x11-libs/cairo
Which seems to have worked out ok, then ran emerge fontforge, but it
ended up in the same error as before ?
I searched the disk for the file: cairo-xlib.h (in Konqueror) but
could not find the file ?
/ Thomas
On Monday 20 April 2009 16:25:07 Philip Webb wrote:
> Can anyone tell me the command to pre-start KDE libs with another desktop ?
>
> Xfce offers the option of pre-starting them,
> but I can't see where it occurs in its start-up scripts.
> I'm currently trying out Fluxbox (generally excellent!)
> &
El lun, 20-04-2009 a las 10:19 -0400, Philip Webb escribió:
> 090420 Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > I stumbled on several posts [1] [2] concerning start-up speed of Linux.
> > Compared with the 5-17 secs posted in the posts, my (slightly old) Gentoo
> > needs around two minutes from power button to DE i
Can anyone tell me the command to pre-start KDE libs with another desktop ?
Xfce offers the option of pre-starting them,
but I can't see where it occurs in its start-up scripts.
I'm currently trying out Fluxbox (generally excellent!)
& would like to have it pre-start the libs for the KDE apps I us
090420 Liviu Andronic wrote:
> I stumbled on several posts [1] [2] concerning start-up speed of Linux.
> Compared with the 5-17 secs posted in the posts, my (slightly old) Gentoo
> needs around two minutes from power button to DE idle.
It will all depend on your hardware & precise start-up procedu
On Monday 20 April 2009 15:44:48 Thomas Chef wrote:
> I tried to emerge lilypond but it fails when building fontforge, with
> the error below.
>
> What do I do ?
>
> Do I issue an bug report ?
>
> / Thomas
>
> In file included from fontP.h:109,
> from gdrawtxt.c:30:
> gxdrawP.h:83:
I tried to emerge lilypond but it fails when building fontforge, with
the error below.
What do I do ?
Do I issue an bug report ?
/ Thomas
In file included from fontP.h:109,
from gdrawtxt.c:30:
gxdrawP.h:83:32: error: cairo/cairo-xlib.h: No such file or directory
gcc -march=c3-
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 20 April 2009 09:30:56 Dale wrote:
>> That said, it has worked well for me. Everything on my rig is working
>> again. If he has to do this downgrade of gcc, then a emerge -e world
>> and everything works again, I'm going to reall
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:28:31 +0400
Vasya Volkov wrote:
> Mike Kazantsev пишет:
...
> lame_opts="--vbr-new -V 2 -B 256"
...
> > flac -c -d "$FLAC" | lame $lame_opts - "$MP3"
...
> > Script actually depends on following packages (main tree):
> > media-libs/flac
> > media-libs/id3lib
> >
depending on your platform.
For asus eeepc has been developed a software named finit-mod which
substitute init executable in the boot process.
I am working on a finit-mod version for gentoo. Actually i use it on my
eeepc with gentoo but there is a big problem...you have to avoid the use
of in
Dear all,
Today I stumbled on several posts [1] [2] concerning start-up speed of
Linux. Compared with the 5-17 secs posted in the posts, my (slightly
old) Gentoo needs around two minutes from power button to DE idle.
Are there any developments in Gentoo concerning this?
Thanks,
Liviu
[1] http://lw
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Vasya Volkov wrote:
> Here:
> 01.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, MPEG Layer 3, stereo 48000 Hz
>
An idea: try to convert it with soundcoverter (or sox, or whatever) to
.wav, and try to load the new .wav in audacity.
Liviu
--
Do you know how to read?
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Alex Schuster wrote:
>> This is almost certainly disk corruption. Boot from a CD and do an fsck
>> on all disk volumes
>
> And maybe do a backup first, in case fsck messes up things worse than
> before.
>
Luckily this wasn't needed. I did the checks using Gparted
Alan McKinnon writes:
> On Monday 20 April 2009 01:03:59 Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > Start-up messags:
> > ln: accessing `/var/lib/init.d/started/rmnologin': Permission denied
>
> That's a very unusual location for init scripts. Did you put them
> there, instead of in the more usual /etc/init.d/?
Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> It's more likely a compatibility issue between very specific modules or bits
> of code that affect lots of systems. Take for example this elog from the
> nvidia drivers:
>
> ===
> This ebuild installs a kernel module and X driver. Both must
> match explicitly in their ver
* Alan McKinnon (alan.mckin...@gmail.com) [20.04.09 01:21]:
> On Monday 20 April 2009 01:03:59 Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I have a (nasty) issue with the system start-up, and probably with
> > corrupted file-system. On start-up, I get several error messages (see
> > below). I suspect
On Monday 20 April 2009 09:30:56 Dale wrote:
> That said, it has worked well for me. Everything on my rig is working
> again. If he has to do this downgrade of gcc, then a emerge -e world
> and everything works again, I'm going to really wonder what the deal is
> with gcc. Just me running into p
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 20 April 2009 02:05:35 Dale wrote:
>
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday 19 April 2009 22:18:24 Mark Knecht wrote:
>>>
2) Should I expect any problems with the system if I do
emerge -e system
emerge -e system [OPTIONAL]
57 matches
Mail list logo
