John P. Burkett wrote:
> Doing revdep-rebuild on an amd64 machine, I received a response
> the included the following lines:
> * All prepared. Starting rebuild
> emerge --oneshot app-text/xpdf:0
> gnome-base/gnome-panel:0
> kde-base/kdegraphics:3.5
> mail-client/-MERGING-evolution:2.0
> media-plug
Doing revdep-rebuild on an amd64 machine, I received a response
the included the following lines:
* All prepared. Starting rebuild
emerge --oneshot app-text/xpdf:0
gnome-base/gnome-panel:0
kde-base/kdegraphics:3.5
mail-client/-MERGING-evolution:2.0
media-plugins/gst-plugins-faad:0.8
media-plugins/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harry Putnam wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann writes:
>
>>> On next boot, the problem with hal daemon reported above started.
>> and you did etc-update/cfg-update after the update? Have you read the
>> messages
>> with elogv? Same hal versions here -
Dale writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>> No I didn't do the update... As reported in OP, I actually wasn't done
>> with the follup chores to an update, and shutdown from a remote due to
>> absentminded pea brainedness.
>>
>> I'm doing that now via ssh. Maybe things will improve...
>>
>>
>>
>
> W
Volker Armin Hemmann writes:
>>
>> On next boot, the problem with hal daemon reported above started.
>
> and you did etc-update/cfg-update after the update? Have you read the
> messages
> with elogv? Same hal versions here - no problems at all.
I've completed the cfg-update -u and there was on
Mike Edenfield wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> On Friday 03 April 2009, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
>>>
>>> I would still think its a problema.
>>> People would install Gentoo, get a functional system, not read the
>>> handbook, and flood the forums and this mailing list with already
>>> answere
Once again I find myself with a big mess following an update world.
This time I was probably out of date by more than 1 mnth, probably
less than 2.
On first reboot the bootup proceeds well into level 3, right up to
starting hal daemon.
There is sets forever.
Since its past the point where ss
Harry Putnam wrote:
> No I didn't do the update... As reported in OP, I actually wasn't done
> with the follup chores to an update, and shutdown from a remote due to
> absentminded pea brainedness.
>
> I'm doing that now via ssh. Maybe things will improve...
>
>
>
Well, if you will cross your
Dale writes:
> Since you can ssh into the system, could you remove hald from the
> default runlevel and reboot? I'm not sure about the keyboard and mouse
> after that tho. At least maybe you can get to a console.
As reported in OP, I sshed in and stopped the start of hald.. that
allowed boot t
gigli wrote:
> I wonder if there is any easy firewall for gentoo. I tried ubuntu for a
> while and used their ufw, which was very simple.
>
> My needs:
>
> Block incoming traffic except for sshd and https (and sometimes
> bittorrent) and allow my lan to connect to my samba share, mythtv and
> mys
On 00:24 Sun 05 Apr, gigli wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wonder if there is any easy firewall for gentoo. I tried ubuntu for a
> while and used their ufw, which was very simple.
>
> My needs:
>
> Block incoming traffic except for sshd and https (and sometimes
> bittorrent) and allow my lan to connect to my
On Sunday 05 April 2009, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Once again I find myself with a big mess following an update world.
> This time I was probably out of date by more than 1 mnth, probably
> less than 2.
>
> On first reboot the bootup proceeds well into level 3, right up to
> starting hal daemon.
>
> Th
Harry Putnam writes:
> But I can ssh into the box.
>
> What should I supply here to allow someone to help diagnose the
> problem?
>
> Recent info on hal from `qlop --list|grep hal'
>
> Sun Feb 15 10:52:16 2009 >>> app-misc/hal-info-20090202
> Sun Feb 15 10:54:45 2009 >>> sys-apps/hal-0.5.11-r8
Harry Putnam wrote:
> Once again I find myself with a big mess following an update world.
> This time I was probably out of date by more than 1 mnth, probably
> less than 2.
>
> On first reboot the bootup proceeds well into level 3, right up to
> starting hal daemon.
>
> There is sets forever.
On 04/04/09 23:55, Alan McKinnon wrote:
[snip]
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
This is complete nonsense advice. There is absolutely no need to rebuild the
entire system every time you upgrade compilers, and whoever told you that is
flat out wrong. If the gentoo docs told y
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:38:45 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> There is such a thing as a prerequisite level of expertise. Every field
> has this and every field SHOULD enforce it. You don't get to drive a
> car on a public road till you have proven that you have learned how to
> drive a car, and you d
On Sunday 05 April 2009 00:07:12 Mike Edenfield wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > This mythical thing - a working installer - probably does not exist and
> > likely never will.
>
> This may be true, and it certainly is the case right now.
> But that's not a good reason to reject one out of hand
> b
On Sunday 05 April 2009 00:11:08 Mike Edenfield wrote:
> > I would still think its a problema.
> > People would install Gentoo, get a functional system, not read the
> > handbook, and flood the forums and this mailing list with already
> > answered and handbook questions.
>
> Aside from this being
Hi
I wonder if there is any easy firewall for gentoo. I tried ubuntu for a
while and used their ufw, which was very simple.
My needs:
Block incoming traffic except for sshd and https (and sometimes
bittorrent) and allow my lan to connect to my samba share, mythtv and
mysql when i use openvpn or
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Friday 03 April 2009, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 17:11, Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 4/3/2009 3:38 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
there is no installer anymore. And that is a good thing.
I will agree that an installer doesn't belong near the top
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 17:11, Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 4/3/2009 3:38 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
there is no installer anymore. And that is a good thing.
I will agree that an installer doesn't belong near the top of anyones "show
stopper" list of Gentoo defects. G
Alan McKinnon schrieb am 04.04.2009 23:55:
> On Saturday 04 April 2009 23:42:54 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
>> Joseph schrieb am 04.04.2009 22:48:
>>> Is there a way to verify GCC version program was compiled with?
>>> I just want to check if all the programs were compiled with latest GCC
>>> version a
Alan McKinnon wrote:
This mythical thing - a working installer - probably does not exist and likely
never will.
This may be true, and it certainly is the case right now.
But that's not a good reason to reject one out of hand
before you even see it.
There are just too many decisions the hum
On Saturday 04 April 2009 23:42:54 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Joseph schrieb am 04.04.2009 22:48:
> > Is there a way to verify GCC version program was compiled with?
> > I just want to check if all the programs were compiled with latest GCC
> > version as I'm getting an errors at time to time.
>
> I
Joseph schrieb am 04.04.2009 22:48:
> Is there a way to verify GCC version program was compiled with?
> I just want to check if all the programs were compiled with latest GCC
> version as I'm getting an errors at time to time.
I don't think it is possible to get the compiler or it's version used
f
On Saturday 04 April 2009 22:42:00 Norman Rieß wrote:
> I am annoyed by a little more generous thing lately, which i am afraid
> isn't fixable by a summer of code. But you wanted to know what annoys
> me, so here it is.
>
> There was a lib update, that broke sancho a while ago. A new version of
> s
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:50:51 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I am sitting on the toilet with your article before me. Soon it will
> > be behind me.
> Brilliant fortune! And I know just the manager who's email is gonna get
> the fortune appended to the end of every reply...
I think it is a Winst
Is there a way to verify GCC version program was compiled with?
I just want to check if all the programs were compiled with latest GCC version
as I'm getting an errors at time to time.
--
Joseph
I am annoyed by a little more generous thing lately, which i am afraid
isn't fixable by a summer of code. But you wanted to know what annoys
me, so here it is.
There was a lib update, that broke sancho a while ago. A new version of
sancho fixed this. But i had to use this new version from the deve
On Saturday 04 April 2009 21:36:00 Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
> >> Second computer with the same symptoms ... this is not machine
> >> specific. Anyone else come across this problem?
> >
> > I rarely use kgpg, but I just checked and mine is
On Saturday 04 April 2009 21:28:41 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Neil Bothwick
>
> I am sitting on the toilet with your article before me. Soon it will be
> behind me.
OK, OK, I know this is so completely and totally OT. But I don't care, and
I've been around here long enough to get away with it:
Bri
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:06:49 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
> > emerge flagedit
>
> Yes, flagedit sure helps on a single box, but when running several
> Gentoo boxes, with slightly differing USE settings, arches and whatnot
> (firewall, server, old box for light browsing/office work, new-ish
> multimedia/
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
>
>
>> Second computer with the same symptoms ... this is not machine
>> specific. Anyone else come across this problem?
>>
>
> I rarely use kgpg, but I just checked and mine is the same.
>
>
>
I looked at mine a whil
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 09:54:50 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I'd like a way to completely lock a package to the current running
> version, and be able to do something like this:
>
> emerge --lock
>
> emerge could then move the ebuild to a local overlay, mask out higher
> versions, and remember th
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
> Second computer with the same symptoms ... this is not machine
> specific. Anyone else come across this problem?
I rarely use kgpg, but I just checked and mine is the same.
--
Neil Bothwick
I am sitting on the toilet with your article before me
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:55:47 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
> > Do you really need to know EXACTLY how many? Or
> > can you just accept a little patience as the cost of using Gentoo?
>
> I'd be happy for a modest, rough guesstimator. A "Gentoo emerge
> weather forecast"-gauge/meter if you will. :)
Befo
Wyatt Epp wrote:
> Greets,
>
> So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things that
> I had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so. Things
> like the danger of depclean or the way portage will only show one mask
> at a time. So I was curious...what have people
On 4/4/09, Stroller wrote:
> Do you really need to know EXACTLY how many? Or
> can you just accept a little patience as the cost of using Gentoo?
I'd be happy for a modest, rough guesstimator. A "Gentoo emerge
weather forecast"-gauge/meter if you will. :)
I'm currently running boxes from ~1Ghz u
On Monday 30 March 2009, Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just noticed today that my kgpg 1.2.2 (using KDE 3.5.9) is not showing
> the email addresses of the public keys contained in it - i.e. the names are
> blank. User IDs and signature email addresses are shown fine when one
> expands the tree.
>
>
* Alan McKinnon (alan.mckin...@gmail.com) [04.04.09 09:57]:
>
> emerge --lock
>
I find this suggestion very good, and would like to ask the more
experienced participants, if such thing was thought of before.
I'm thinking about some options to freeze a system totally, servers
would like this,
On 4/4/09, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:24:58 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
>
>> - Managing USE flags is sometimes quite irritating, having to fidget
>> around /etc/make.conf, /etc/portage/package.use and such with
>> everyone's favourite text editors. (Maybe I'm micromanaging them too
>
I am using Gentoo for some years now, and installing Gentoo on a new
box isn't hard at all, but you have to be prepared. You need a running
linux-system, a live-CD (or USB-Stick), and the handbook.
So, i have SLAX and the handbook on my USB-Stick which i use to install
Gentoo. Boot SLAX, look at t
On Saturday 04 April 2009 10:59:35 ABCD wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > What could work is a way to do these checks during the initial phase so
> > you get told about it before the actual building starts, just like with
> > blockers.
>
> Which is exactly how it works, now, with the new USE-deps (
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:24:58 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
[...]
- Difficulty of predicting how long some new package compilations (with
dependencies, upgrades and revdep-rebuilds etc) will actually take
(genlop -t only knows about individual packages that have been emerged
befo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> What could work is a way to do these checks during the initial phase so you
> get told about it before the actual building starts, just like with blockers.
>
Which is exactly how it works, now, with the new USE-deps (before yo
On 4 Apr 2009, at 08:56, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:24:58 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
...
- Difficulty of predicting how long some new package compilations
(with
dependencies, upgrades and revdep-rebuilds etc) will actually take
(genlop -t only knows about individual packages that
* Nikos Chantziaras (rea...@arcor.de) [04.04.09 03:55]:
>
> I thought about it and I would still like an installer. People asked me
> "I want that too" after they see what Gentoo can do and is about. I
> could help them learn to keep their Gentoo healthy and running, but I am
> not willing to
Mike Kazantsev writes:
> -mtune=native can be dropped if -march=native is there already.
It is still worthwhile keeping it in CFLAGS as some packages remove or
replace the '-march' flag.
Dan Cowsill wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Daniel da Veiga
> wrote:
>
>> I would still think its a problema.
>> People would install Gentoo, get a functional system, not read the
>> handbook, and flood the forums and this mailing list with already
>> answered and handbook questions.
On Saturday 04 April 2009 09:59:15 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 09:45:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > bash
> > vi
> > tar
> > emerge
> >
> > Note that these are the *exact* *same* *tools* you are going to use
> > every day after the install is done.
>
> You must be joking, I wouldn'
On Saturday 04 April 2009 01:24:58 Arttu V. wrote:
> - Portage 2.2 stopping dead with "you should re-emerge foo with USE=bar"
> with the new cat/foo[bar]-style dependencies.
Sadly, that one is unavoidable. You have a circumstance where it is not
possible to continue and the missing bit must be fi
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 09:45:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> bash
> vi
> tar
> emerge
>
> Note that these are the *exact* *same* *tools* you are going to use
> every day after the install is done.
You must be joking, I wouldn't be caught dead using the first two ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
DCE seeks D
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:24:58 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
> - Managing USE flags is sometimes quite irritating, having to fidget
> around /etc/make.conf, /etc/portage/package.use and such with
> everyone's favourite text editors. (Maybe I'm micromanaging them too
> much?)
emerge flagedit
> - Keeping
On Friday 03 April 2009 23:46:44 Mark Knecht wrote:
>I think you may be correct, but the problem still exist. The
> problem is that you can be running an driver on your system. The
> portage maintainers depreciate it. the ebuilds get stripped form my
> machine. Sometime later I choose to clean
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:14:05 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I like the idea but does it solve the root-cause issue - whatever that
> might really be - for portage maintainers removing ebuilds and code in
> the first place? If it was in the sunset overlay then we'd say they
> don't have to support it a
On Friday 03 April 2009 22:11:28 Mike Edenfield wrote:
> On 4/3/2009 3:38 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > there is no installer anymore. And that is a good thing.
>
> I will agree that an installer doesn't belong near the top of anyones
> "show stopper" list of Gentoo defects. Gentoo doesn't *
Hi Alan,
Thanks a lot for a quick reply. It turn out that I need to activate LVM
at the boot time using rc-update.
Hung
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:36:08 Hung Dang wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>> I have a strange problem with LVM2. I follow this guide
>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc
On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:36:08 Hung Dang wrote:
> Hi all
> I have a strange problem with LVM2. I follow this guide
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/lvm2.xml to create the LVM2 volume named vg
> then create the logical volume /dev/vg/data. Everything went fine and I
> can mount the volume /dev/vg/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and
> performed "emerge system" ?
> What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell...
>
> --
> ~adj~
I am afraid I can't really
59 matches
Mail list logo
