On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
> I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today and
> got the following strange message:
> [blocks B ] dev-libs/libgweather-2.22.1.1)
>
> Now I have neither of these on my system, so what is the matter -- is
> portage insane? I
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 29. April 2008 schrieb ext Alan McKinnon:
>
> Some small corrections:
> > > What is the smoothest way to do it?
> >
> > change profile
> > emerge --sync
> > emerge -avuND world
>
> First sync, then change profile. Remember, the profil
on Tuesday 04/29/2008 Ian Graeme Hilt([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Tuesday 29 April 2008 08:27:57 pm John covici wrote:
> > I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world
> > today and got the following strange message:
> > [blocks B ] > dev-libs/libgweather-2.22.1.1)
>
> L
Am Dienstag, 29. April 2008 schrieb ext Alan McKinnon:
Some small corrections:
> > What is the smoothest way to do it?
>
> change profile
> emerge --sync
> emerge -avuND world
First sync, then change profile. Remember, the profiles are in the tree.
> > How might I manage to change the current p
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 08:27:57 pm John covici wrote:
> I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world
> today and got the following strange message:
> [blocks B ] dev-libs/libgweather-2.22.1.1)
Looks like you're running unstable. In this case you're supposed
to know what to do
Thank Willie!
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Willie Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:05:07AM +0800, Penguin Lover Chuanwen Wu squawked:
>
> > 1, Why I got a new kernel image(2.6.24-gentoo-r4-gb921d0de-dirty)
> > instead of using the old one (2.6.24-gentoo-r4-g506ab2
I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today and
got the following strange message:
[blocks B ]
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 07:26:31 pm Daniel Mendler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I switched to the 2008.0 profile with "eselect profile set".
> Now every ebuild is masked. Is the 2008.0 profile not yet
> usable or are some special adjustments necessary?
Not sure in your case, although if you provide some more
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:26:31 +0200, Daniel Mendler wrote:
> I switched to the 2008.0 profile with "eselect profile set". Now every
> ebuild is masked.
Which 2008.0 profile? eselect shows four for amd64, probably the same
number for other arches, which one are you using?
--
Neil Bothwick
Why
Hi,
I switched to the 2008.0 profile with "eselect profile set". Now every
ebuild is masked. Is the 2008.0 profile not yet usable or are some
special adjustments necessary?
Daniel Mendler
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
hello there...i have a little trouble booting to windows from lilo...windows
is on sdb1 and gentoo on sdc2...when i try to boot to windows i get an error
"ntldr is missing"...my lilo.conf is as follows
boot=/dev/sdb
> prompt
> timeout=50
> default=Gentoo
>
>
> # Gentoo-2.6.24-r4
> image=/boot/kern
Well I am not sure, but maybe there is a way of adding more space on
your appliance, if neccessary.
The idea that strikes me, is you could use your current appliance as
the Gentoo-life-system and you install a new machine in that free
area, chroot to it and work further. Really the classical fresh
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'd like to jump an 2006 install up to 2008. I've never made that
>> big an update without a fresh install.
>
> There's no such thing as a "2006 install". What does exist, is the
> collection of packages that were on the LiveCDs released in 2006. It's
Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> I don't want to comment about the change. However, you could have found
> out easily all the available profiles by doing "eselect profile list":
That's a cool eselect module, didn't know about that. I don't change
profiles all that often (duh), and end up having to search
Willie Wong ha scritto:
1) Yes, switched to TexLive (on at least one box)
2) No, no problems that I can remember. Just need to follow the guide
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/tex/texlive-migration-guide.xml
and make sure to select the modules you need with USE flags.
Whoa. I didn't know an
Ian Graeme Hilt wrote:
>
> Download the 2008 minimal install cd and install.
>
> Frankly, updating a 2006 install to 2008 is counter-productive. You'll
> have a much easier time doing a fresh 2008 install.
Why? If he kept his box up-to-date, there are just going to be some slight
changes in th
on Tuesday 04/29/2008 Alan McKinnon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Tuesday 29 April 2008, John covici wrote:
>
> > OK, what will I gain if I change the profile from
> > /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop to
> > /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2007.0 (I don't even h
On Tuesday 29 April 2008, kashani wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Having just installed mysql on my server, I've found that I have to set
> > bind-address = 0.0.0.0 in /etc/mysql/my.cnf to enable me to connect to
> > mysqld over the local network: leaving it at the default 127.0.0.1 causes
> > c
On Tuesday 29 April 2008, John covici wrote:
> OK, what will I gain if I change the profile from
> /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop to
> /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2007.0 (I don't even have a
> 2008.0 -- maybe I need to sync)? Will it unmaks useful packages or
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:18:47 +0200, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> I don't want to comment about the change. However, you could have found
> out easily all the available profiles by doing "eselect profile list":
True, but Gentoo allows, even encourages, working at the lowest level
without helpful tools
On Tuesday 29 April 2008, 15:48, Vladimir Rusinov wrote:
> I've setup chap-secrets and peer and when I'm doing #pon my_vpn I'm
> getting following:
> using channel 32
> Using interface ppp0
> Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/7
> sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1
> ] rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0>] sent [LCP C
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:57 PM, John covici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on Tuesday 04/29/2008 Alan McKinnon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
>
> > On Tuesday 29 April 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> > > > This kind of gratuitous change is bullshit and *really* ticks me
> > > > off as useful important
on Tuesday 04/29/2008 Alan McKinnon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Tuesday 29 April 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> > > This kind of gratuitous change is bullshit and *really* ticks me
> > > off as useful important stuff just *goes away*
> >
> > I don't want to comment about the change. However, y
On Tuesday 29 April 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> > This kind of gratuitous change is bullshit and *really* ticks me
> > off as useful important stuff just *goes away*
>
> I don't want to comment about the change. However, you could have
> found out easily all the available profiles by doing "eselec
On Tuesday 29 April 2008, 21:00, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I rattled off the path to profiles from memory in my previous post
> without actually checking what I had on the machine :-)
>
> When I went to look for it, I didn't find a 2008.0 profile at first -
> that took a 'find' command. I see now I h
On Tuesday 29 April 2008, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > Hmmm. I may have read this latest post just in time. My system
> > contains
>
> /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop and I had just
> linked /etc/make.profile to it and synced up. I was about to emerge
> world -- it was
> goin
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:35:53 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > Hmmm. I may have read this latest post just in time. My system
> > contains
> /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop
Ah, they've moved it! The other profiles are in
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux, that's why th
Peter Humphrey wrote:
Having just installed mysql on my server, I've found that I have to set
bind-address = 0.0.0.0 in /etc/mysql/my.cnf to enable me to connect to
mysqld over the local network: leaving it at the default 127.0.0.1 causes
connection requests to be rejected.
Is there a more se
Neil Bothwick wrote:
2008 hasn't been released yet. Switch to 2007.0 for now, then it will be
less of a change when 2008.0 is released.
It was released on April 1st. ;)
Be lucky,
Neil
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:31:05 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > How might I manage to change the current profile from x86/2006 to
> > x86/2008
>
> Change the /etc/make.profile symlink or use eselect profile.
>
> > That
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:31:05 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How might I manage to change the current profile from x86/2006 to
> x86/2008
Change the /etc/make.profile symlink or use eselect profile.
> That option is of course not available currently at
> /usr/portage/profiles.
2008 hasn't bee
On Tuesday 29 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd like to jump an 2006 install up to 2008. I've never made that
> big an update without a fresh install.
There's no such thing as a "2006 install". What does exist, is the
collection of packages that were on the LiveCDs released in 2006. It'
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to jump an 2006 install up to 2008. I've never made that big
> an update without a fresh install.
>
> What is the smoothest way to do it?
Download the 2008 minimal install cd and install.
Frankly, updating a 2006 install
On 04/29/08 09:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use lyx 1.5.4 with tetex on a Gentoo computer. It works fine;
I'm thinking about switching to texlive, as tetex seems on a deadend. Has anyone
done it yet ? Got any problem ? How does LyX work with it ?
Please let me know,
The transition works OK;
I'd like to jump an 2006 install up to 2008. I've never made that big
an update without a fresh install.
What is the smoothest way to do it?
How might I manage to change the current profile from x86/2006 to
x86/2008
That option is of course not available currently at
/usr/portage/profiles.
--
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:43:09AM +0200, Penguin Lover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
squawked:
>
> I use lyx 1.5.4 with tetex on a Gentoo computer. It works fine;
> I'm thinking about switching to texlive, as tetex seems on a deadend. Has
> anyone
> done it yet ? Got any problem ? How does LyX work with it
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:05:07AM +0800, Penguin Lover Chuanwen Wu squawked:
> 1, Why I got a new kernel image(2.6.24-gentoo-r4-gb921d0de-dirty)
> instead of using the old one (2.6.24-gentoo-r4-g506ab20b-dirty) ? As I
> know if I add/change something as modules, all I need to do is "make
> && ma
Hello!
I'm trying to connect from my home box to my office network.
At home I have US Robotics ADSL modem (192.168.1.1) and gentoo host
192.168.1.3. 192.168.1.3 is set up as DMZ in modem (so, all ports are
open and all portmapped to 192.168.1.3). iptables is not set up (it
looks I haven't even mod
Selon Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Dienstag, 29. April 2008 schrieb ext Dirk Heinrichs:
> > Am Dienstag, 29. April 2008 schrieb ext [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > I use lyx 1.5.4 with tetex on a Gentoo computer. It works fine;
> > > I'm thinking about switching to texlive, as tetex seems on
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 10:51:30 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Having just installed mysql on my server, I've found that I have to set
> bind-address = 0.0.0.0 in /etc/mysql/my.cnf to enable me to connect to
> mysqld over the local network: leaving it at the default 127.0.0.1 causes
> connection request
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> > Yes, sure that's it but "where" exactly do you indicate Y
> > to the Experimental? That must be what I cannot find.
> You'll have found it straight away now that you've replaced your damaged
> sources, but for the record, it's the first option on the first
Having just installed mysql on my server, I've found that I have to set
bind-address = 0.0.0.0 in /etc/mysql/my.cnf to enable me to connect to
mysqld over the local network: leaving it at the default 127.0.0.1 causes
connection requests to be rejected.
Is there a more secure value for this para
Am Dienstag, 29. April 2008 schrieb ext Dirk Heinrichs:
> Am Dienstag, 29. April 2008 schrieb ext [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > I use lyx 1.5.4 with tetex on a Gentoo computer. It works fine;
> > I'm thinking about switching to texlive, as tetex seems on a deadend.
> > Has anyone done it yet ? Got any pro
Am Dienstag, 29. April 2008 schrieb ext [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I use lyx 1.5.4 with tetex on a Gentoo computer. It works fine;
> I'm thinking about switching to texlive, as tetex seems on a deadend. Has
> anyone done it yet ? Got any problem ? How does LyX work with it ?
Yes. No. Yes.
HTH...
Roger Mason schrieb:
Hello,
Has anyone else run into this:
emerge virtual/emacs
[snip]
Unpacking m4-1.4.11.tar.lzma to /var/tmp/portage/m4-1.4.11/work
Something is wrong with your portage PATHs, because it wants to unpack
to /var/tmp/portage/m4-1.4.11/work and not to
/var/tmp/p
I use lyx 1.5.4 with tetex on a Gentoo computer. It works fine;
I'm thinking about switching to texlive, as tetex seems on a deadend. Has anyone
done it yet ? Got any problem ? How does LyX work with it ?
Please let me know,
~adj~
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
46 matches
Mail list logo