[gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix portage-utils complation under musl

2014-11-14 Thread daggs
Greetings, I'd like to offer a patch that fixes portage-utils compilation under gentoo+musl by defining missing define. Signed-of By: da...@gmx.com commit 7b308c23f0b190377094bdca84779aea6433a478 Author: daggs Date: Fri Nov 14 20:23:54 2014 + fix portage-utils issue diff --git a/app

[gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation under gentoo+musl

2014-11-14 Thread daggs
Greetings, I'd like to offer the following patch that fixes compilation errors of sys-process/cronie on gentoo+musl by defining a missing definition. Signed-off By: da...@gmx.comcommit 8469ddf591582e5e391f4ee67230431f861bf8aa Author: daggs Date: Fri Nov 14 20:23:22 2014 + fix cronie

Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation under gentoo+musl

2014-11-14 Thread Tóth Attila
It's hard to spot the missing define in your patch, which includes a complete list of files of a whole package. Most of the material is consumed by the Changelog, tl;dr. Do you mean these two? +#include +/* match gnu to posix */ +#define MAXNAMLEN NAME_MAX I would suggest to attach the respons

Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation under gentoo+musl

2014-11-14 Thread PaX Team
On 14 Nov 2014 at 22:05, "Tóth Attila" wrote: > I would suggest to attach the responsible patch of the missing define only > and the necessary diff of a given ebuild file. That two files could be > enough, I guess. yes and probably choose a better list and/or open a bugzilla entry as i doubt this

Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation under gentoo+musl

2014-11-14 Thread daggs
Greetings, > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 11:05 PM > From: "Tóth Attila" > To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation > under gentoo+musl > > It's hard to spot the missing define in your patch, which includes a > complet

Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation under gentoo+musl

2014-11-14 Thread daggs
Greetings, > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 11:52 PM > From: "PaX Team" > To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation > under gentoo+musl > > On 14 Nov 2014 at 22:05, "Tóth Attila" wrote: > > > I would suggest to attach th

Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation under gentoo+musl

2014-11-14 Thread Tóth Attila
Musl is ment to be an alternative to libc. Some of the hardened folks (perverts ;->) are interested to make it work on Hardened Gentoo. But musl itself is not necessary hardened per se. You've linked the Hardened project subpage. The package maintainer happens to be a hardened developer (blueness).